It is not clear whether the psychologist and the client’s father would cross paths again. However, there may not be anyone else to see the boy and the psychologist may be forced to manage the dual relationships due to unavoidable circumstances. As mentioned in Code in some situations a dual or multiple relationships might be inevitable or culturally expected (e.g., in rural, indigenous, or immigrant communities) (Canadian Psychological Association, 2000). If that is the case in the vignette, Should the psychologists decide to explore the idea of managing a dual relationship, the psychologists may need to take extra precautions such as obtaining supervision or consultation for the duration of the therapy with the child to reduce biases (Standard III.34). The psychologist needs to inform the client’s father that seeing him for personal gains is a real conflict of interest, may impact the welfare of his child, and their therapeutic relationship (Standard III. 35). However, in the vignette, the psychologists did not take all reasonable steps to resolve the conflict of interest in a manner consistent with Principle I and Principle
It is not clear whether the psychologist and the client’s father would cross paths again. However, there may not be anyone else to see the boy and the psychologist may be forced to manage the dual relationships due to unavoidable circumstances. As mentioned in Code in some situations a dual or multiple relationships might be inevitable or culturally expected (e.g., in rural, indigenous, or immigrant communities) (Canadian Psychological Association, 2000). If that is the case in the vignette, Should the psychologists decide to explore the idea of managing a dual relationship, the psychologists may need to take extra precautions such as obtaining supervision or consultation for the duration of the therapy with the child to reduce biases (Standard III.34). The psychologist needs to inform the client’s father that seeing him for personal gains is a real conflict of interest, may impact the welfare of his child, and their therapeutic relationship (Standard III. 35). However, in the vignette, the psychologists did not take all reasonable steps to resolve the conflict of interest in a manner consistent with Principle I and Principle