These pieces of evidence include information regarding the Vikings involvement in Iceland and England. In his interview, Fitzhugh was asked about the Iceland sagas historical content and how valuable it is to the Vikings studies. Fitzhugh states that the “documents are phenomenal,” but later questions on if they were fabricated or not. This is due to most of the documents being written hundreds of years later based on stories told from Viking ancestors. This goes for the same as in England. The stories of Lindisfarne were told about a hundred years later in church documents. This also could have been fabricated because the church was completely one-sided and bias toward the harsh interpretation of the Vikings. With this evidence supporting Fitzhugh’s argument, he can conclude that yes, these writings and sagas are useful for finding information on Vikings, but they can also be misrepresented because these were stories written hundreds of years
These pieces of evidence include information regarding the Vikings involvement in Iceland and England. In his interview, Fitzhugh was asked about the Iceland sagas historical content and how valuable it is to the Vikings studies. Fitzhugh states that the “documents are phenomenal,” but later questions on if they were fabricated or not. This is due to most of the documents being written hundreds of years later based on stories told from Viking ancestors. This goes for the same as in England. The stories of Lindisfarne were told about a hundred years later in church documents. This also could have been fabricated because the church was completely one-sided and bias toward the harsh interpretation of the Vikings. With this evidence supporting Fitzhugh’s argument, he can conclude that yes, these writings and sagas are useful for finding information on Vikings, but they can also be misrepresented because these were stories written hundreds of years