This case is related to a suit filed by Fitl on Mark. Fitl claimed that he was sold an ungradable sports card by Mark. Mark claimed that Fitl did not inform him of this defect on time due to which he was not liable for any damages faced by him. Court decided in favor of Fitl and awarded him $17, 750. When Stark made an appeal in another court, this decision was maintained in favor of Fitl. In this case study, focus is towards written agreement and its accountability.
In case there was a written agreement between two parties regarding grace period within 7 days to one month, Mark would have gotten the advantage. In this scenario, the grace period would have been clearly defined by both parties, therefore, Fitl would have lost the case since
In case there was a written agreement between two parties regarding grace period within 7 days to one month, Mark would have gotten the advantage. In this scenario, the grace period would have been clearly defined by both parties, therefore, Fitl would have lost the case since