Andrew Jackson's Financial Crisis

Improved Essays
On September 3, 1783 the American Revolution came to an end leaving America to be an independent nation. However, this war, as with any war was very expensive; America starting off with $43 million in debt ("TreasuryDirect KIDS - The History of U.S. Public Debt - The Beginning of U.S. Debt"). But, the debt doesn’t stop here, it continues to grow with the nation as the government provided more services for civilians. This debt caused a severe depression that spurred Shays’ Rebellion. When new farmers couldn’t afford to pay high taxes, local sheriffs seized farms and throw farmers in prison ("Shays ' Rebellion"). Massachusetts could have prevented this by passing pro-debtor laws, and printed more paper money for more forgiving debt, but they …show more content…
After Jackson left office in 1837, a financial crisis followed, namely the Panic of 1837. This was a financial crisis that went on until around 1845. Partly caused by Andrew Jackson’s fear of banks created a chain reaction. Jackson uses executive power in 1833 to basically shutdown the Second Bank of the U.S. by remove all federal funds and placing it in smaller state banks across the nation known as pet banks ("Andrew Jackson Shuts Down Second Bank of the U.S."). But, his hatred for banks didn’t stop there, he also wanted to rid the country of paper currency replacing it entirely with species, gold, and silver. Inflation grew dramatically as bank notes became worthless because unregulated state banks overextended credit. Then Jacksons final order as president was the Specie Circular, in U.S. history, an executive order issued by President Andrew Jackson requiring that payment for the purchase of public lands be made exclusively in gold or silver” ("Specie Circular"). Eventually this was repealed by Congress on May 21, 1838 …show more content…
The rift between the two movements became amplified after America won the Mexican war and raised the question whether the new land would allow or prohibit slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was used to keep both sides at bay by giving the North and South different benefits just like the Missouri Compromise did in 1820. The North got California as a free state, slave trade banned in Washington D.C., and Texas loses boundary. On the flip side, the South received no slavery restrictions in Utah or New Mexico, slaveholding in Washington D.C., the fugitive slave law, also $10 million to Texas. The best part about this deal for the South was the fugitive slave act, which required all escaped slaves to be returned to their master, even in free states. If slavery wasn’t already unconstitutional enough, now no runaway slave was safe. Tension kept building between the two sides as the short term compromise would lose its effect. For example, “the Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that mandated “popular sovereignty”–allowing settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state’s borders” (History.com, "Kansas-Nebraska Act"). Passing this bill in turn threw the Missouri Compromise out the water as Kansas and Nebraska

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As with most compromises, neither side was truly happy with what they had to work with. The South feared that the compromise would “establish the principle that congress could make laws regarding slavery” while the North “condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of slavery” into the newly expanding nation. Though it did keep the peace in the fragile nation for over thirty years, it was eventually overturned by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed. The repeal of the Missouri compromise enraged many northerners. The Northerners felt that the south was gaining more control of the…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bank War was a campaign started by Andrew Jackson to terminate the Second Bank of the United States, but it was mainly due to that fact that his reelection assured him that his objection to the bank won his national support. Andrew Jackson's antagonism with the capable national bank and its "paper cash" can be followed as far back as the First Bank of the US. Jackson lost everything amid the time when the market development and the accessibility of western grounds ought to have offered safe open doors for monetary change to an ever increasing number of people. Jackson rebuked the keeping money framework for his own monetary disasters (all including land hypothesis and useless certified receipts). With overpowering help of the majority, Jackson was chosen president in 1828 and offered energy to look for change. In 1829, he cautioned Congress in his first yearly address that "both the constitution and the convenience of the law making this are all around addressed by a vast part of our kindred nationals." With this announcement President Jackson proclaimed war on the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson had been monetarily harmed by conjecture and a fixing of bank credit from the get-go in his business profession. He held a doubt of money related establishments for the duration of his life. At initially, notwithstanding, Jackson's position on the Bank was not ostensibly adversarial. He was worried about the Bank's defendability. In 1832, Jackson vetoed the bill to recharter the Bank of the United States because he felt that the bank was a threat to their economy and to the people of America. This shows Andrew Jackson’s economic nationalism because he is trying to preserve the economy. Jackson took further action in 1833 by taking away federal funds from the Second Bank of the United States and moving it to the capital into loyal state…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Compromise of 1850” was a resolution constructed by Henry Clay in an attempt to appease both Northerners and Southerners, in regards to if the new territorial expansions acquired from the war with Mexico and subsequent “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” in 1848, should allow slavery. The compromise allowed California to be a free state and gave New Mexico and Utah the policy of “Popular Sovereignty” or the ability for the people of the state to decide on slavery. Texas was given relief on 10 millions dollars worth of debt in the compromise for the re-allotment of a portion of it 's land to New Mexico. The compromise also outlawed slavery in Washington DC, as the spectacle was a national embarrassment. In addition the compromise enacted the “Fugitive Slave Act,” a means for Southerners to retrieve…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jackson opposed the Second Bank of the United States because he declared it unconstitutional. He viewed it as a monopoly, only an elite group of wealthy people ran the bank. After Jackson’s second term, he began to place federal money into state banks, Pet Banks, rather than the National Bank. These banks started to make their own money, which had no value on other markets. The recession…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regarding the Bank Crisis, Jackson had a plan to destroy the bank and hated paper money as it created a stable currency. He vetoed the bill authorizing the bank and then, to jeopardize the bank he took all of the government’s money…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the Compromise of 1850 allowing the possibility of new slave states, it also place legal demands upon northerners to help in recapturing fugitive slaves. When the Mexican war was won it introduced a vast of new territories. With these new territories, came concerns. America’s victory forced Mexico to cede with California to the United States among other states. America’s decision on choosing which states to allow slavery lead to multiple…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, the moral arguments of the Compromise of 1850 were numerous and very heated. The North wanted to keep slavery out of California, the state in question, but the South wanted California to be entered as a slave state. In addition to this, California had already requested to be a free state, so the North and California benefitted from this part of the compromise (Compromise 1). The North and the South were still divided on other current issues, such as the current fugitive slave laws. Henry Clay, the designer of this compromise and many others, wanted to satisfy both sides of the thirty-sixth degree line, so he strengthened and amended the Fugitive Slave Act (Brinkley 355). Antislavery supporters were infuriated by this, but could not change the decision on the act. These are just a few of the moral problems that arose about slavery during the Compromise of 1850's conceiving.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These issues had been boiling up until the topic of slavery brought fuel to the fire. In the compromise of 1850, amendments were made to the Fugitive Slave act, which was an agreement made by the northern and southern states, that if a slave escaped to a northern state he or she would be returned to their masters in the south. The Fugitive Slave Act now added that when a fugitive was captured, he or she was no longer was granted a jury trial and instead the decision of whether or not they were free was up to a commissioner. Obviously the commissioner is more likely to return the slave since they would receive more money that way. The “Compromise of 1850” was created by Senator John C. Calhoun, Henry Clay and Daniel Webster. All three men passed away two to three years after the “Compromise of 1850” and no one took a stand to be the voice of reason in the country. Southern economy as it is agricultural became more dependent on slavery while the North more diverse economics and did not rely on slavery. The Kansas bill in 1854 declared that any state out of the Nebraska territory would enter the union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of their admission. The implanted Popular Sovereignty and resulted in destroying the Whigs party, planting irreconcilable divisions in the democrat party, creating two new parties, the Know-Nothings and the…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To begin with, after the Mexican Secession, California had written a constitution of its own, which banned slavery, and asked Congress for admission as a free state- beforehand, there was equal balance of power in the senate. Sooner rather than later, radical southerners had spoken of secession and the question of a compromise had arisen, which Henry Clay and Douglas favored. Eventually the Compromise of 1850 had been instituted. The Compromise had admitted California as a free state, set up Utah and New Mexico as territories, the nation’s capital banned the slave trade in D.C, and the New Fugitive Slave Law was enacted in the south (Doc A). President Fillmore had believed it to be the end of sectional division but the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 had turned the North as a hunting ground for fugitive slaves and because slaves could not testify, they were denied a jury trial (doc C). Correspondingly, the issue of slaves in the Constitution had appeared again in the Dred Scott case. Dred Scott was a man who had sued for his freedom and had went all the way to the supreme court. However, Congress could not make laws regarding slavery in the territories, thereby making the Missouri Compromise legal and slavery legal throughout the nation. Also, because of the Dred Scott case, slaves were deemed unable to sue. Coupled with this, underground railroads were built and those who…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Jackson’s veto message, he rejects a bill that rechartered the Bank. Jackson’s argument was that the Bank gave privileges and unfair advantages to the wealthy. He also opposed foreign ownership of stock. Not only this, but he also questions the constitutionality of the Bank. Jackson later warned that banks and corporations would steal citizens’ liberties away from them in his Farewell Address in 1837 (Jackson). Feller mentions in his article that “since the financial collapse of 2008, Jackson’s warning seem not only urgently relevant but eerily prescient” (Feller). This was mainly caused by deregulation, or the reduction or elimination of government power in a particular industry, in the financial industry which allowed banks to partake in hedge fund trading (Amadeo). I agree with what both Jackson and Feller have said about this topic. I agree with Jackson because the wealthy had too much power financially. I agree with Feller because he seems to side with Jackson and talks of how it happened in the future from Jackson’s…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states. Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War. (kincaid’s class…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It stated that (for the North) California was to be admitted as a free stare, which also set off the “balance” of slave-to-non-slave sates, slave trade was to be prohibited in Washington D.C., and that Texas would lose the boundary dispute with New Mexico. In other words, the south got no slavery restrictions in Utah or New Mexico territories, slaveholding permitted in Washington D.C., Texas would get 10 million dollars, and the Fugitive Slave Law (authorized local governments to capture and return escaped slaves to their owners and had imposed penalties on anyone who aided in the slave’s flight) would be passed. The Fugitive Slave Law caused the most controversy, however. Though both the North and South benefited from the Compromise of 1850, the Compromise seemed to favor the North. This infuriated the…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1784 the American revolutionary war concluded and there was economic depression. The Continental Congress was confronted with demands of repayment for wartime loans from a mass of angry individuals and negatives began to arise with the Articles of confederation. America had no way to repay its debts from war and farmers were not able to reimburse the large sum of money for the land they were given in order to provide for the other states during the war. The government was unstable as each state was watching out for its self while making existence worse for its neighboring states with tariffs and trade barriers. Only adding to the hardships, disgruntled farmers decided that they did…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt to solve tensions between the North and the South over the expansion of slavery, specifically into Texas, which was a territory obtained by the United States in the Mexican…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays