Advantages And Disadvantages Of Financial Reimbursement

Improved Essays
Financial reimbursement comes in many different forms and modes. Insurance companies are the main way that people are able to reimburse for services. Without it, they would have to personally pay for and reimburse medical care out of pocket. Many people receive health insurance from their employers. When being employed, one should receive insurance that would cover basic medical needs, including methods of contraception. In fact, many employees have contraception included in their reimbursement plans through their insurance. But, like anything in this world, there are limitations. One example of a reimbursement limitation is Hobby Lobby’s refusal to cover employees for contraception usages. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the reimbursement …show more content…
The morning-after-pill can range anywhere between thirty to sixty dollars and the intrauterine devices can cost someone up to one thousand dollars without insurance (Planned Parenthood, 2014). These prices can really add up for an individual, especially if one is of lower socioeconomic status. This limitation of paying for contraception methods is putting female employees from Hobby Lobby at a disadvantage. With advances happening in our country today, there is medical research to show that these forms of contraception do not lead to abortion. Religious traditionalists have a definition that pregnancy occurs when an egg is fertilized when in actualization, medical definition says that pregnancy doesn’t occur until implantation. Research shows that eighty percent of eggs do not even implant (Gunter, 2014). There is much evidence to show that both the morning-after-pill and intrauterine devices do not lead to abortion when used. This limitation on contraception usage is causing costly damage to a woman who decides to use these methods, which could be a huge disadvantage to …show more content…
According to the Affordable Care Act, there is a mandate that insurance companies pay for reproductive health, such as contraception, without co-pay. There is an estimate of about two million Americans that use contraception devices such as IUDs. Due to this law and the company not following it, Hobby Lobby had to pay a large amount in fines. They had to pay up to 1.3 million dollars a day to the IRS in fines (Hobby Lobby ObamaCare, n.d.). Because of their religious beliefs, Hobby Lobby has caused a large issue that had to be brought to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled that Hobby Lobby did not have to pay for contraception coverage. Their insurance still had to cover everything required by the Affordable Care Act, with exception to reproductive health and contraception. The portion of the premium that should have gone to contraception coverage would be subsidized. This does not mean that employees cannot get contraception methods; they would just have to pay for it themselves. This ruling is causing worry for many people around the world. People fear that religious exceptions will be made on other major issues such as vaccines. Others think that businesses should not be forcing their religious beliefs on their employees (Hobby Lobby ObamaCare, n.d.). The Affordable Care Act mandates that contraception be covered by insurance policies, directly correlating with Hobby

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hobby Lobby’s case argued that their right to religious freedom and beliefs were being violated. They also argued that obligating them to provide contraceptives to their employees violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The RFRA was enacted in 1993 and requires that the government not hinder an individual’s freedom to exercise their religion unless “doing so is the least restrictive way to advance a compelling government interest” (The Economist 1-2). Hobby Lobby argued that obligating corporations to provide their employees with contraception was not the least restrictive way (NWLC…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict is the women want birth control and Hobby Lobby doesn’t want to give it to them because it is against their religious morals. This case advances civil liberties for it defines more about amendment. It shows the religion in relation to the workplace is still important even through the government believes firmly in separating the two. The issues if for both sides tough on rights therefore the court had to pick which is the most important in this situation. This case fits in to the history of cases for it touches on when and where you should separate religion for the organizations to not hurt the majority of the…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobby Lobby Case Summary

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As part of the Affordable Care Act’s implementing guidelines, group health care plans are required to include preventative care coverage, including methods of contraception. There were some exceptions where religious facilities and organizations are exempt from these requirements. After the Hobby Lobby case, the department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created some accommodations for certain non-profit organizations stating that they may opt out from providing contraceptive coverage by certifying their religious objection. By receiving the certification, they will be opted out from funding the contraceptive coverage but organization’s insurance company or its third-party administrator will step in, to provide the coverage. In 2014, the government provided a second accommodation for religious non-profit organizations to write a letter to the government in order to be released of any obligations to provide contraceptive coverage mandate in Affordable Care Act.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After only having the clinic opened for ten days, Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton were found guilty and arrested with a fine of $100 each. Estelle Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton had a strong enough case to be heard in the U.S. supreme court, their representative argued in front of the chief justice and associate justices that a state cannot pass a law that forbids all people to use contraceptives and it is forbidden to do so by due process in the first amendment, he also argued that the law was ever brought because it applies to married couples in to women’s whose lives may be at risk if they become pregnant on the other hand the state of Connecticut representative argued that married couples practice birth control because it still available in Connecticut. He also argued that the state did have the right to pass a law and their only intention was to reduce the chances of immorality and prevent intercourse outside of marriage. As a result of the case in the ruling, the state of Connecticut’s argument was not strong enough to persuade the non-associate justices, they agreed that the constitution does protect the right to married couples, the bill of rights state individual laws but when they are together they create a right to privacy against government invasion of citizen rights. For the final decision, 7-2 decided in favor of Griswold.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I don’t think the government should have the power to force a private or family-owned business to provide insurance coverage for something that truly goes against the religious beliefs that are being used as the foundation of the organization. In the case of Hobby Lobby, at least, they are willing to offer something. True some of what isbeing offered is ridiculous since it can easily be obtained over the counter without health care coverage, but at least, they are offering a health care plan that includes the majority of the most commonly used…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It was alos argued that the penalty was a tax that was not authorized by the federal government’s power to lay and collect taxes as granted by the Constitution. The Supreme Court held that eh interstate commerce clause did not support forcing individuals to purchase health insureace because the clause does not permit the government to force someone to engage in intersate commerce, it only allows them to regulate existing interstate commerce. The Court did state that the penalty was a tax and therefore not contstitutional. The Court also stated that Congress had the authority to pass the Affordable Care Act under the “necessary and proper clause” however at least some the the constitutional provisions that Congress planned to use for enforcement were deemed unconstitutional. (National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius,…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Hobby Lobby’s defense of a woman’s right to choose what type of contraception they can use has taken the argument of religious freedom to another level. It has allowed businesses across the country to deny not only women their right to birth control, but it has also been used as a defense against providing services to LGBT Americans. It’s important to point out the difference between what a civil liberty is, which protects you against discrimination and what religious liberty is, which protects you from engaging in anything that opposed your faith.…

    • 98 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The court case started because the Affordable Care Act was passed due to many Americans experiencing the lack of a stable form of healthcare insurance. This is evident through,”According…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Planned Parenthood has been under scrutiny most recently in the past few years for their role in abortions in the United States. Planned Parenthood believes that a woman shouldn’t be judged by the government or anyone for the decisions that they make because a woman’s body is her own and she should have the decision of what she wants to do with it. This was the basis of the Supreme Court case: Roe v. Wade. “Jane Roe” argued the Texas stature that an abortion at any time during the pregnancy was illegal. The court ruled in her favor by saying that a woman has the right to get an abortion until the fetus has reached fetus viability.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kimberly Ross of Red State says “In fact, Planned Parenthood has so much money on hand that they spent $38 million on campaigns this year to put Hillary in the White House and pro-abort candidates in Congress.” Now that is a lot of money to be spent on something that has nothing to do with the patients of Planned Parenthood. To me it just seems unjust that people are paying taxes to the government for abortions while the Planned Parenthood business gets to play with tax dollars from the government to support a candidate’s…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This procurement would guarantee that all FDA-sanction contraception would be secured as preventive care, and permit ladies to completely get to the ant conception medication strategy for their decision without co-pays. While Planned Parenthood commends the numerous advantages in the new law an example from the textbook stated, "From 2011 to mid-2014, states enacted 222 new abortion restrictions, more than in the entire previous decade" (Sidlow 87), but keeps on restricting the fetus removal procurements in the Affordable Care Act. The new law sets up a confounded framework requiring two separate installments from people, one for abortion scope and one though wellbeing could not care less scope. Luckily, the new medicinal services law does exclude the complete and aggregate restriction on private health care coverage scope for premature birth that Planned Parenthood assisted effectively with crushing. That implies wellbeing planning will even now have the capacity to offer thorough protection scope for regenerative medicinal services, including abortion, the length of private stores is utilized to pay for such…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, having an exchange, or market place that provides individuals to obtain and pay, from a competitive market place, for their private insurance policies is not socialized medicine. Conversely, religious freedom has a multitude of protections provided within the care act itself. As stated in an article by Timpothy Stoltzfus "Separation anxiety: abortion funding & the Affordable Care Act. " Religious freedom is protected, the law prohibits the use of federal money be used for abortions, similarly, protecting the doctors from retaliation for refusing to perform…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that strives to provide trusted community health care, inform and education the community using comprehensive sex education, lead the reproductive health and rights movement, and advance global health. Every year the Planned Parenthood Federation of America receives over $1.3 Billion dollars in funding. Of this 1.3 Billion dollars, over $500 Million or roughly 40% of Planned Parenthood’s total annual income come from federal funding. The possible defunding of Planned Parenthood due to US Senate bill S.1881 would cause serious and negative consequences including the loss of women's health care for hundreds of thousands of women and increased federal spending. A bill was introduced on July 28th…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Asking for the defunding of the national reproductive health provider, an act that would make basic health care and services - including family planning - out of grasp for millions would be ill advised. The people that are requesting to eliminate federal funding to Planned Parenthood are ignoring research that has shown time and time again that publicly funded family planning is one of our government 's most cost-effective and smartest public investments. In the past couple years, Planned Parenthood has joined abortion in conservative crosshairs, but the economic assistance it confers once made it an uncontroversial issue. For decades, with the help of Title X and Medicaid and other health providers, Family Planning has the nation’s only program solely focused on making family planning available to all. They help prevent or provide care for millions of unintended pregnancies, unintended births, abortions, sexually transmitted infections, and cervical…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This mandate would also not cause a financial strain on insurance companies required to provide this coverage for employees. Yet, with that being said, the court decided to agree with the argument from the Hobby Lobby corporation. The court allowed the ability to opt out of supplying contraception to its employees and in result, the Hobby Lobby corporation was not forced to supply this portion of Obama Care. The Hobby Lobby corporation successfully argued as a “for profit” corporation.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays