The first weakness is, qualitative field studies often yield precise descriptive statements about large populations (Babbie & Maxfield, 2013). The second weakness is, field observation can develop systematic counts of behavior and reasonable estimates of large population of behaviors beyond those that are actually observed. In addition, it is difficult to know the total population of a given phenomenon. When designing quantitative field study or assessing the representativeness of another study. The researcher should think carefully about the density and the predictability of what will be observed. Then after that, the researcher must decide on if sampling procedures are possible to tap representative instances of cases they will observe (Babbie & Maxfield, 2013). In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of various types of field studies can be considered in the terms of their validity, reliability, and
The first weakness is, qualitative field studies often yield precise descriptive statements about large populations (Babbie & Maxfield, 2013). The second weakness is, field observation can develop systematic counts of behavior and reasonable estimates of large population of behaviors beyond those that are actually observed. In addition, it is difficult to know the total population of a given phenomenon. When designing quantitative field study or assessing the representativeness of another study. The researcher should think carefully about the density and the predictability of what will be observed. Then after that, the researcher must decide on if sampling procedures are possible to tap representative instances of cases they will observe (Babbie & Maxfield, 2013). In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of various types of field studies can be considered in the terms of their validity, reliability, and