Massey says that she was angry because she believes that space is actually what matters for geography; however, philosophers and social scientists made the space into a residual dimension. The over-focusing of time instead of space is the factor that Massey is angry about; she believes that space has dynamic and three-dimensional. Space changes the way of human beings’ lives. People cannot just simply consider space and flat and describe it without its context.
2. Massey says that space is “the dimension of things being, existing at the same time: of simultaneity. It’s the dimension of multiplicity.” What do you think she means by this? Can you think of an example of this that is different from the things Massey describes?
She means that space …show more content…
In the interview, Massey explains that globalization is a “geography of power”. What does she mean by this idea? Can you connect what she says here to things we have discussed in class or another example from your own …show more content…
These counties are in the process of developing to become a developed country. People think about developed countries like the United States and Britain, and these countries already have a strong power in economic and other factors. Massey provides the example of Argentina, which is a developing country. She believes that in order to let Argentina become a developed country, the nation should follow the same history as London has. However, maybe in reality, Argentina would like to develop other aspects in order to become a developed country; instead of following the exact steps as London did.
6. How was the Occupy London Movement spatial? *if you aren’t sure what the Occupy movement was about, check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street.
Occupy London Movement spatial because when the day this movement happened, the same movements were also happening worldwide. These movements were spatial in different places of the world.
7. How does the concept of space help us to think about power, according to
2. Massey says that space is “the dimension of things being, existing at the same time: of simultaneity. It’s the dimension of multiplicity.” What do you think she means by this? Can you think of an example of this that is different from the things Massey describes?
She means that space …show more content…
In the interview, Massey explains that globalization is a “geography of power”. What does she mean by this idea? Can you connect what she says here to things we have discussed in class or another example from your own …show more content…
These counties are in the process of developing to become a developed country. People think about developed countries like the United States and Britain, and these countries already have a strong power in economic and other factors. Massey provides the example of Argentina, which is a developing country. She believes that in order to let Argentina become a developed country, the nation should follow the same history as London has. However, maybe in reality, Argentina would like to develop other aspects in order to become a developed country; instead of following the exact steps as London did.
6. How was the Occupy London Movement spatial? *if you aren’t sure what the Occupy movement was about, check this out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street.
Occupy London Movement spatial because when the day this movement happened, the same movements were also happening worldwide. These movements were spatial in different places of the world.
7. How does the concept of space help us to think about power, according to