Scientists want to be able to control what the next generation is like so they can make the future successful. Genetically engineering offspring contradicts nature . Therefore, it will have more setbacks than advantages.…
The downfall to this technology is the fear that “designer babies” will be created. Scientist have the innovative technology to change the genetic makeup of a baby, it is hard to trust that they will not take advantage of this…
Based on the article, “Editing the Human Race” , I do not support the “Jurassic Park” experiment. This experiment is used to recreate many extinct species, such as dinosaurs and the woolly mammoth, or to change the DNA of an already living species. In order to recreate one of these species, one must have the DNA of the extinct species, an appropriate host animal (one that looks relatively similar to the extinct species), and access to CRISPR, the latest technology for DNA coding. CRISPR uses an enzyme called Cas9 to cut open old DNA and implant new DNA from another person/species. This is all very cheap as well, costing about $30 for the procedure.…
Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area forever, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally find itself in the news and the argument reignites but falls flat within a couple of weeks waiting till the next breakthrough arises. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent progress in genetic engineering, which brings into perspective the relevance, development, and the possibility that soon…
Most people don't completely understand what gene therapy really involves or any of the safety issues including this kind of treatment. More research and expanded knowledge can help us understand. Another issue is that Gene therapy trials have not been very successful but the best way to get results is to proceed with research. A side affect of the continued effort on research is that most religions think that the idea of changing who you are and what you look like should not be changed.…
Appeal to Pathos: Examples: “You will surely make your dear mother happy should you make her breakfast.” “When you finally leave for college, I will be the only child left. I’m sure I will find myself all alone far more often, all without a fleeting bit of hope left. The last one left, that’s me. ... College awaits, no?”…
“Man cannot discover new oceans unless he has the courage to lose sight of the shore. ”-André Gide. This, to me, defines the parameters in regards to a class and academic project being rewarding; it has to reach further than the surface. For something to be rewarding it has to be valuable and worthwhile. Learning something new, uncovering information untold, and discovering something because of a simple curiosity is what I truly find rewarding.…
Use the Nautilus as an example of how scientific technology can be both good and bad. Cite modern day examples as well, such as stem cell research or nuclear technology. Should there be regulations to curb what scientists study and how they apply their discoveries to everyday life? There are many, many different types of scientific technologies; and not all of them can be good. To contradict, not all scientific technologies can be bad.…
Genetic engineering used to be the thing the scientists experimented on plants and animals but now humans. I dont think its right to change the way people live life just to either look a little better or be a little smarter. It's okay in some situations, for instance when someone has really bad pain and it is never ending. We need something to fix it that is not pain killers. Instead we should just have surgery and never feel that amount of pain again but just enough pain to the point where we don't hurt yourself without knowing it (Doc 2).…
The article “listening for the Public Voice” by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienchein discuses the many arguments, both for and against, surround human embryo gene mutation and experimentation. They then provide multiple examples from scientific history in which the practices had faced the same amount of scrutiny from the public, yet once people saw the rewards that could result from these practices, they allowed these practices to become “normal”. In the article “Listening for the Public Voice”, Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienchein argue the public voice has more power than most people think, if it is used correctly. They do this through logical reasoning with specific examples in society where this has happened in order to encourage the public to stand strong in what they believe.…
For scientists who are waiting for an alternative to existing genome editing tools, Crispr-cas9 is the solution which is comparatively easy and effective in using. Crisper allows the researcher to edit, target, excise and stitch genes of their choice between two end cuts. Crispr has the potential to make such advances which researchers used to dream about. It worked so well, scientists began to issue ethical statements for its use particularly about the power of Crispr to change germline in humans which presents a hotly debatable issue. Genome editing in human germline could have unpredictable effects on future generations.…
“I saw the dull yellow eye of the creature open; it breathed hard, and convulsive motion agitated its limbs […] His limbs were in proportion, and I had selected his features as beautiful” (Shelley 287). In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein gives life to a creature he had spliced together from the remains of bodies in the local cemetery. And just as Victor Frankenstein spliced together his monster, scientists around the globe are splicing together DNA sequences from multiple organisms in order to create genetically altered foods and viruses. The first genetically engineered organism garnered worldwide attention in 1973, when Herb Boyer and Stanley Cohen created the first recombinant DNA organism by joining a gene from the…
“At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone’s specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? (Hayes 245).” In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” Richard Hayes argues against Ronald M. Green, a professor of Emeritus of Religion and of Ethics and Human Values at Dartmouth College, specifically responding to his essay about using genetic technology to change children’s DNA. Hayes, who holds a Ph.D. in Energy and Resource, which saluted the United States to ban human cloning worldwide, believes it would disrupt human nature and the human future.…
“The overall view of the human genome project has been one of great excitement and positive press, but there are people who have concerns that are quite reasonable, and they are frightened of the things they don 't understand” - Thomas R. Cech. Cech’s quote refers to the new discoveries in biotechnology. Many have heard the phrase before; does ‘designer babies’ ring a bell? It might, since it has been a very controversial topic in the science world. Many scientists believe altering the genes in human embryos to eliminate diseases is beneficial to society.…
In light of my qualifications for the Masters Education Program of Genetic Counseling situated at Virginia Commonwealth University, it is significant to understand the spark that lit the conflagration of my interest in the field. Genetics as a whole has proven to be a profound influence on my life until this point, as it has for many others, but contrasted from others in its influence on my mindset and desire to understand the world that surrounds humanity. The questions of why people behave, look, feel, or develop in a certain manner as opposed to another has always proven to be definite fascination in my life and through genetics the opportunity for finding the answers to such questions was revealed in its entirety. The reason for suffering…