The clip begins at a good pace with the host introducing Suzanne Venker (anti-feminist), though this is the only point where there seems to order in the video; once they began the discussion on The War On Men by Venker the conversation begins to pick up the pace. The conversation starts by Venker claiming that “the younger generation of women are being raised differently; they’re taught to be independent and believe that they can do great things themselves without the help of a man causing the women to be more contentious then needed.” (Venker). Once that was said each of the other five people began to give their input and talk over one another. By each individual consistently doing this and trying to rush to get their point across, it makes the video become less effective because the audience member’s attention is quickly shifting to each person speaking, not giving themselves time to take in what was just said. Not only is the rushing an issue in the video, but also the intense feeling given off to the …show more content…
The tone is calm, serene, and did not attack others views, whereas each video came across as if the audience was being yelled at or told they were wrong about their own views and thoughts. In the article Venker post comments from people who do not agree with her anti-feminist viewpoint, however she responds to them peacefully and respectfully instead of yelling at them or telling them they are thinking incorrectly about this particular topic. The way she goes about answering each comment is what makes the article most effective, she does not make the audience feel stupid or that they are flawed for the way that each individual thinks; she also expresses her own opinions without being rude. Yet, her tone isn’t the only thing that makes the article the most effective, the article is also effective due to how easy it was to follow