Felony Murder Rule

Improved Essays
According to, the article, The Juvenile Death Penalty: A Frustrated Society’s Attempt for Control by James R. P. Ogloff (1987) examined the attempt to control the United States in the provision for the juvenile death penalty. Besides that, the author discusses the various Supreme Court decisions that affected society’s control over the death penalty for juveniles. For instance, the Supreme Court decision on Thompson v. Oklahoma, which examined whether it was constitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments of the Constitution, the Court deemed it unconstitutional. However, the felony-murder rule define as “any death occurs during the commission of a felony is first degree murder, and all participants in that felony or attempted felony

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Crime Simmons Case Study

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court looked back on the history of the execution of juveniles and found that the rates of capital punishment to juveniles had been reducing in frequency. To support the holding, the Courts also looked to other countries and how they handled the execution of juveniles guilty of murder. And found that many of the countries had discontinued the practice of the death penalty for minors. On a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Missouri, Justice Stevens and Justice Ginsburg concurred that the evolving standards of decency do change our understandings of the Constitution and if the interpretation of the Amendment held when it was originally drafted it would allow for the execution of 7-year-old children today. Justice Scalia, Chief Justice and Justice Thomas dissented as they felt that the meaning of the Eighth Amendment should be “determined by the subjective views of the members of the court and like-minded foreigner”.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Case Summary #3: Roper, V. Simmons, 2005. This is a case that involved a series of appeals against the sentencing to death of Christopher Simmons, a AuthorLastName3 minor aged 17 years. Although an earlier appeals even in the Supreme Court found the execution of a minor constitutional, the decision was overturned by the same court in 2002, arguing that opinion in the general public had changed in favor of not executing minors. The court argued that, apart from the change in public opinion, executing minors was a disproportionate punishment that was no longer…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Re Gault Case Essay

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruled, “Capital punishment must be limited to offenders who commit a narrow category of the most serious crimes and extreme culpability makes them deserving of execution.” www.casebriefs.com This is due to the fact that juveniles lack maturity and understanding of responsibility. They are also more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures. The courts also noted that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as an adult.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gary Graham Case Study

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over three centuries later, the Supreme Court established 16 as the very minimum age for an offender to be sentenced to death. Despite the courts recognition of the constitutionality of the practice,…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Essay

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is no doubt that the two separate cases of Roper v. Simmons and Thompson v. Oklahoma the act of murder was committed by minors who were tried, convicted, and deserving of a fitting punishment. However, in this analogy between the primary and secondary analogue, the argument of Roper v. Simmons is if a minor under the age of 18 should be sentenced to Capital Punishment, and if doing so is a direct violation of the Eighth Amendment citing cruel and unusual punishment (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma, “that executing persons for crimes committed at age 15 or younger constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment” (Roper v. Simmons, 2005). In part, because Oklahoma’s death penalty statute set no minimum age limit in which he or she would be sentenced to death (Flaherty, 2002).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethos Pathos Logos

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juveniles and Capitol Punishment: Extending Eight Amendment protections Samuel Joseph Joest Arizona State University Abstract Introduction Is it cruel to sentence a minor to death? Is it right to end the life of a juvenile so early with no chance to rehabilitate and change into a better person? What about sentencing them to life without the chance of parole? Never getting the chance to be rehabilitated to more mature people. In the early days of the justice system, juveniles were treated no different from adults and were sentenced to the same punishments.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Juvenile crime has been an increasing point of debate in recent years. Many people argued whether they should be sentenced as adults or not when convicted of a serious crime, such as murder. Some argue that juveniles deserve to be treated as such despite the crime they have committed, while others believe they are to be treated as adults. This resulted in many juveniles receiving adult sentences like life in prison without parole. Some juveniles commit crimes without a thought of the risks, while some carefully plan out their crimes and get a serious thrill out of it.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kentucky. It still prohibited the death penalty for juveniles under 16, but it state that the death penalty was legal for juveniles 16 or older. The Court looked only at the national consensus of the death penalty to assess society’s standard of decency; they were specifically looking to see if society believed that the death penalty was cruel and unusual punishment. As state statutes were split on the legality, the Court found that there was no one prominent view on the subject.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversial debate on the Eighth Amendment has been going on years but recently the debate over age, race, mental retardation, and mental ill on whether who should receive the death penalty. Most states do not believe in executing a child, they believe a teenage committing a heinous crime still has time to grow and mature. The first Supreme Court case, Eddings v. Oklahoma (1982) dismissed the death sentence on this sixteen-year-old boy because the child is inexperience, less educated and has no appreciations of the consequences that may happen to him. Most children have anger…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine this. You are happily married with an amazing son who is your whole world. He is currently fourteen years old and nothing could be better. One day he is peer pressured into holding a gun for a friend who claims it is no big deal. His friend tells him to shoot if anyone comes around the corner while he breaks into the closed store.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juveniles as young as 14 are being positioned in prisons with adults from minimum to maximum prisons. A minimum prison would house offenders who have committed a minor offense such as theft, while a maximum prison house felonies who have engaged in activities such as rape or murder. In 2005, the Supreme Court banned the death penalty ruling “people under 18 are immature, irresponsible, susceptible to peer-pressure and often capable of change (Scott, 2012).” Although, the court recognizes juveniles are immature, irresponsible, and susceptible to peer-pressure yet juveniles remain housed with adults. “For instance, several studies have reported a greater probability of recidivism for juveniles processed in the adult justice system compared with…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Children ranging from the ages of thirteen and up have been tried in court as adults and are faced with harsh sentences to die in prison without the slightest consideration of their circumstances and age for the offense penalized against them. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, determined that “requiring that all children convicted of homicide receive lifetime incarceration without possibility of parole, regardless of their age and age-related characteristics and the nature of their crimes” is a violation of the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment (Cost of Mass Incarceration). According to Stevenson, “The U.S. is also the only country with life sentences without parole for 13 year-olds…. kids don’t have the judgment, the maturity, the impulse control and insight necessary to make complicated lifelong decisions. They can’t make the same kind of long-term judgments.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is not to argue about the pros and cons of the death penalty and juveniles, but to give data it can inform the controversial argument to focus on the Death Penalty and Juveniles. This is important to the general area under study because it will give a clearer view on the opinions of each person on the death penalty and juveniles. The intent is to provide details of death penalty and juveniles, whereas to give an understanding of what causes these young offenders to commit a crime and why the law agrees with the death penalty on juveniles with no difference from the adults. Additional studies show the death penalty used with juveniles may perhaps appear to be civilized or not. Sentencing a juvenile to death could lead to asking questions for…

    • 2957 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been many opinions on juveniles being convicted as adults on the crimes they have committed. When it comes to some of these harsh crimes, who could not punish the individual to the fullest? It does not matter how old a person is because everyone knows the difference between right and wrong. If someone is raised differently and believes it is okay to murder another human, than they cannot just change their mindset. An individual that makes and adult decision should have the same consequences.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays