Fee Hunting Argumentative Essay

Approximately 70% of in the United States is owned privately. These private lands are a are a major habitat for wildlife and provide a vast array of outdoor activities for people. Private land owners can gain an income from fee hunting and it is an motivation for them to properly manage the wildlife habitat. Fee hunting has many advantages to it as well as disadvantages. Land holders with an interest in the wildlife are more likely to maintain the range than those that have no concern for the wildlife. “Morrill suggested that private land in Texas was managed better during the 1980s then in the 1960s”. He believed this was because large rise in revenue from fee hunting throughout this period. When the wildlife gains worth to the landowners, they then realize that the wildlife is beneficial to them, not a liability. …show more content…
There are many issues concerning fee hunting. Hunting is becoming an elitist activity, private owners do not put back what is gained from fee hunting, introducing nonnative species are a few. Since private land owners can set their own rate and 70% of the United States is private this could potentially make hunting into an elitist sport. Those that can afford to hunt will be able to hunt. Wildlife organizations have suggested the earnings from fee hunting of landowners from allowing others hunting privilege on their land does not always render habitat enhancements. Thus, there would be minimal improvement to habitat quality. Stocking of nonnative wildlife onto private land will put a strain on the carrying capacity which will overstress the land. This overstress from the nonnative species potentially could cause unrepairable harm. It was found that the land that ranchers lease for the use of fee hunting were not maintained for the wildlife’s habitat (Butler et al.