Federalists Vs Anti Federalist Essay

Federalists strongly support a strong central government. They believed the constitution was exactly what the new country needed. The central government was to have three separate branches. In addition, they wanted to form a central bank and army. They had truly wanted to make the nation grow and be successful so the next generations will prosper.
The difference between Federalists and Anti-Federalists:
While both the federalists and anti-federalists wanted the best for the country, that did not mean both of their methods would accomplish this goal. The constitution was just one piece in the difference between them. Federalists completely supported the creation and in enforcing the constitution. Anti-federalists however, felt, "There is no declaration of rights; and, the laws of the general government being paramount to the laws and constitutions of several states, the declarations of rights in the separate states are no security." (Objections to the Constitution) They wanted to keep the governments within the state set up as a type of monarchy. The central government that federalists wanted to create was to, "lay a due foundation for that separate and distinct exercise of the different powers of government, which to a certain extent is admitted on all hands …show more content…
The creation of the army would provide safety for the entire country and cause the nation to prosper. The creation of this militia would, "proposes to empower the Union " to provide for organizing arming, and disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, RESERVING TO THE STATES RESPECTIVELY THE APPOINTMENT OF THE OFFICERS, AND THE AUTHORITY OF TRAINING THE MILITIA ACCORDING TO THE DISCIPLINE PRESCRIBED BY CONGRESS."" (No. XXIX of The Federalist Papers) Despite granting the states some rights regarding the militia the Anti-Federalist's still opposed it. "The liberties of