Federalist No. 10 Summary

Improved Essays
Federalist No. 10
Main idea: Rationalizes the choosing of a republic, and then goes to outline the the necessity of factions, and their role in society.

Factions are introduced in the paper, and the issues that reside around them. There is no way that all men are going to have the same interests, or same amounts of money or property. Because of this, factions are created. The largest faction will ultimately be the poor. This plays into what Madison believes, stating that if there are a ton of people in a republic, then the leaders of said republic will have to take into account the feelings of the poor, because they have to win their vote. If you have a small society, then you can forget about the small people. Plus, the larger the republic,
…show more content…
One way the people’s rights would be protected is by the separation of powers, that would balance out the power among the government. He then goes on to show, even in the branch with the most power, the legislature, the power is divided among two houses to get rid of tyranny. The second idea he talks about is classes, and the importance of conveying the common interests of most people. He says that the larger the republic, the more room there is for uniting among the factions, and those said factions can then justly represent themselves. No one group nor branch of government will be will be dominant, and the people’s interests will be represented through this …show more content…
A sizable portion of the piece is about the injustice of power in this new ‘republic.’ Centinel I specifically focused on the collection of taxes, and how giving this free range power to congress, it gives a lot of room for despotism, due to the omnipotence of congress. Finally, they examine the coming aristocracy if the constitution was put into effect. Centinel believed that only those who were high class, and educated would ever be in office, and would then unjustly represent the people. In all, it very concisely covered the doubts of the anti-federalists, in a very sequential

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This passage is called Framing the Constitution and was written by Charles A. Beard. Like Roche, the topic of this passage is the Founding Fathers that wrote the Constitution. The author’s purpose for writing this passage was to inform you on his viewpoint on the framers of the Constitution and maybe even persuade you to agree with him. Charles Beard’s thesis is that some of framers of the Constitution were just rich individuals that were trying to protect their own property and wealth. Beard believes that the framers protected against the majority just so they don’t get overthrown by them.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anti Federalist 5 Summary

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Anti Federalist 5 talks about the downside of a union and blast the Scotland England union. The person who wrote this says that the people on the Scottish Parliament who voted against it were commoners and not corrupted by gold. Scotland also had to pay most of the debt. They would send more troops to war. The British also had way more representation with 45 members and Scotland with only a few in the House of commons.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the essay Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton addresses the people off New York, and requests that the president would be a selective ruler he outlines what the presidents powers should be. His introduction was very strong and made the reader want to hear his points. Alexander Hamilton discusses the character of the executive branch by comparison to the king of Great Britain and state governors. He introduced to the reader that the president would be elected for a term of four years; he would be suitable for re-election, and would not have the life tenure of a traditional ruler. The president would be liable to impeachment, trial, and removal from office upon being found guilty of disloyalty, subornation, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist No. 10 responds to the Antifederalists argument that a “large republic” cannot long survive. Madison set out the task of devising a republic in which a majority of citizens will be unable to tyrannize the minority. Madison says the rotten apple is factions. Factions are defined as a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Revolution is over a decade past; it’s 1787, the United States is currently using the Articles of Confederation. The recent events of Shay’s rebellion show us that the Articles of Confederation is inefficient and fails to protect people's natural rights. This raises a concern that the Articles of Confederation should be replaced by the new Constitution. We should ratify the Constitution to better protect people's natural rights. Amos Singletary, a Massachusetts representative, is against the ratification (Doc1).…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even at the author’s introduction, he juxtaposes “the Honorable George Mason/Mr. Gerry” to himself, a “Freeman of Connecticut”. Freeman depicts his lack of influence to relate to the citizens; his own essay is evidence of a regular man contending against all the opinions of the more intelligent. Emulating a citizen of the country, Freeman presents the fears of a republican government with questions such as whether the country will be “happy in a good or wretched in a bad form of government?”, and if all the greatness and freedom of America will be “squandered away?” All these concerns reiterate the thoughts of the citizens about the constitution and the potential new government, and they provide a sense of urgency for the citizens to take action. Freeman portrays himself as a model to persuade his audience to stop conforming to others’ opinions, so he can prevent ignorance being the cause of the constitution’s…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Priscilla Etim HIST 1301 Professor James Adams July 26, 2017 The Great Compromise: The Ideals and Values of a Growing Nation The Great Compromise of 1787 is the compromise or the settled agreement of the dispute that erupted due to conflicting views and objectives presented from the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. The purpose of these plans was to create proposed changes to the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the constitution of the United Stats of America was written in 1787 it has long since been a topic of conversation as well as confrontation among politicians and political theorists alike. The ideals of James Madison and John Dewey regarding constitutional reform and democracy are just another example of this. These two men, both extremely influential in their own way, have conflicting views of liberty, democracy and largely the revision of the constitution and its consequences or lack there of. James Madison, Father of the U.S. Constitution, believed that constitutional revision should be infrequent. While John Dewey argues for change, while not specifically on constitutional revision but rather for “effective liberty” for the state of democracy as a whole, which ultimately relates to that of constitutional revision.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the pseudonym Publius, James Madison wrote Federalist Paper #10 to try to encourage the state governments to ratify the constitution. In this essay, Madison argued that a Republic, specifically the Republic proposed within the Constitution, would provide the perfect balance between the rights of the citizens and national security. In a direct democracy, there are no checks in place to ensure that the government is functioning as it should. A few dissenters can gather a following and cause problems within the government. This type of government, according to Madison, gives the people too much power and subsequently fails to effectively maintain social order.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither Tocqueville nor the authors of the Federalist Papers view an enlightened and virtuous citizenry as wholly essential to the Constitutional system, but while the federalists build institutions to defend the government against the self-interested passions of the people, Tocqueville sees the greatest benefits of the American political system where the government and the people meet: in the township and in political associations. The Federalists believe that the core of the Constitution system’s success lies in its institutions rather than the people. Their writings repeatedly show doubt in the abilities of the public to govern, construct institutions to defend against their involvement, limiting their civic duties to elections. Tocqueville,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, why we as American citizens are bound to uphold our constitution? Second, have we had an opportunity to express our views on our constitutional system? Third, how has the constitutional system served our democratic values? Dahl uses the eight chapters in his book to offer plausible answers to the questions he proposes. Dahl begins by outlining the historical roots of the constitution.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To Madison the faction means a group of people that have the same interest and. The factions are bad in Madison’s eyes because they cause friction against people’s interest and contravene on the rights of people. Factions are inevitable because people tend to gravitate towards people that are similar to them. The only two ways to get rid of factions are get rid of liberty ( and this is a “cure worse than the disease,” as Madison so rightly calls it. The other way to get rid of factions is to make every other person have the same interests, likes, and dislikes, and this is impossible.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays