Federalist 16 Analysis

Decent Essays
Federalist 16 is about how the death of the confederacy is what they needed for their not to be a civil war. They were always ready to engage in a war against the complying states no matter what the consequences could be. Alexander Hamilton proceeds onto say that if there is going to be a civil war, it will also be the death of the confederacy because the stronger states will prevail. He also says though if there is not a war between the states the federal government’s power would no matter to them anymore. They would start doing their own thing such as bidding on different things which would eventually lead no more federal government. He also supports the war because he wants there to be a national constitution that everyone looks to for laws and rules to be followed. As follows, in the next one, federalist 17, he talks about the constitution and how much power and how much power the national government could have. He also thinks that if the government was going to try and take power from the states that it would be very hard to do so because he thinks more people will side with the states over the national government. This is because they are more likely to have the same thoughts and opinions for where their location is while the government is making it for everywhere. Federalist …show more content…
One of the benefits of this was it would bring all the states under one power. Also, people left Europe to not be ruled by a monarchy and that’s what was most likely going to happen if this document was not signed. Another reason is that they did not want a civil war to happen that was about to start. The next reason is that they did not want to let the union continue to abuse people for their own good so they did not have to do anything. Another major impact it had, is it did not allow one side of the government to become too powerful over the other, but for them to be close to being evenly

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many people see the Articles of Confederation as a constitution that failed, however it did do some good for the United States. In the mid 1780s, the national government resolved a series of territorial disputes between states when they passed the Land Ordinance laws. Land was set aside in the west for schools and rules were established for creating new states. Although, the Articles of Confederation fixed land disputes it could not fix the economic issues that followed after the war. States were left in debt and unable to pay it off, resulting in an economic depression.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51 Summary

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Madison wrote the Federalist Paper No. 51 specifically to explain to the readers how this new government makes liberty possible. He explains the various checks and balances that have been placed in order to ensure that not one specific branch would have too much power. The Federalist appeared in many different New York newspapers such as The New York Journal and The Daily Advertiser. The Federalist essays were written as responses to the many antifederalist opinions against the Constitution and they were originally intended to be only twenty essays long but were instead continued due to the continued criticisms of the Constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The separated powers established in the Constitution are outlined in Federalist Papers 47 - 51. In Federalist #47 Publius states that Publius argued with this being the case, tyranny can be best prevented by arranging a system in which these powers can not become concentrated. In Federalist #51. Publius claims that the constitutional system makes each institution independent of each other. Furthermore, he states that the powers granted to each institution are in place to keeping the other two institutions in…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carmelo Figueroa Per. 4 November 2, 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Tyranny is one of the reasons that governments have gone to anarchy; People have rebelled and started riots or even wars due to the oppression of tyranny. The founding fathers of America wanted a government that was strong, but not too strong.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They did so by using the document in order to build a stronger argument against the anti-federalists. They believed that having a strong central government would have a positive outcome on the commercial growth that the new country had in store for itself. While the Anti-federalists viewed the country being made up of mostly farmers, the federalists believe it should be a country filled with large varieties of different groups that had different interests and competing groups. The Federalists did emphasize that none of the groups would over power them all and that each group would represent themselves to what they believed was the best in order to be successful. Many people believe that the Federalists were more concerned with making sure that the economic and social changes were seen and dealt with rather than examining the overall transformation that America would undergo over the next couple of years.…

    • 2188 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This compromise resulted in such a chaotic uprising in the south and the north. Basically federalist were urban city people from the farmer people, or in simpler terms, the north verses the south. Mainly, the south still wanted slavery and the north felt it was wrong. Also people wanted to be in charge, it’s a shame how this nations feeds off of power, and who is in control. The south wanted more power and to be able to have slaves to work and make money for them.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the essay Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton addresses the people off New York, and requests that the president would be a selective ruler he outlines what the presidents powers should be. His introduction was very strong and made the reader want to hear his points. Alexander Hamilton discusses the character of the executive branch by comparison to the king of Great Britain and state governors. He introduced to the reader that the president would be elected for a term of four years; he would be suitable for re-election, and would not have the life tenure of a traditional ruler. The president would be liable to impeachment, trial, and removal from office upon being found guilty of disloyalty, subornation, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Federalist Papers were papers written in 1787 by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. There were eighty-five papers in total. However we will just be covering numbers ten, fifty-one, forty-seven, and thirty-nine. These cover many of the major problems that would be facing a new government. These papers were very important to our constitution, and our founding.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist papers were written in attempt to get citizens to ratify the United States Constitution in 1787, and more specifically the citizens of New York. Eighty-five essays made up the Federalist papers. When citizens were reviewing the United States Constitution the Federalists papers basically guided them through it and helped people to understand how the Constitution should be interpreted as well as where the ideas came from. In the first paper we were assigned, Federalist number 10, James Madison argued that if you wanted a satisfactory economy the Partisan democracy is not the best idea to get that.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second federalist paper was written by John Jay to the people of New York. The title of the paper was "Concerning Dangers from foreign force and influence for the independent journal. " The second federalist paper was divided into sub categories about the United America, constitution and the government. John Jay argued why we should stay united as one and pointed out the way to make that possible was to institute a national government to care for the union and rival the European foreign force in case of any future conflict. John Jay began supporting his position by saying the government was an indispensable necessity.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If they were accepted into the Union this would disrupt the balance between the free and slave states in the United States Senate. Even though it was accepted, many believe that this compromise was patchwork to hold together the balance and political equilibrium that would eventually lead to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither Tocqueville nor the authors of the Federalist Papers view an enlightened and virtuous citizenry as wholly essential to the Constitutional system, but while the federalists build institutions to defend the government against the self-interested passions of the people, Tocqueville sees the greatest benefits of the American political system where the government and the people meet: in the township and in political associations. The Federalists believe that the core of the Constitution system’s success lies in its institutions rather than the people. Their writings repeatedly show doubt in the abilities of the public to govern, construct institutions to defend against their involvement, limiting their civic duties to elections. Tocqueville,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Logical Appeals Essay In Federalist 51, by James Madison, there are several examples of the classical appeals ethos, logos, and pathos that strengthen the Madison's point and allow him to get across his point far easier. The appeals not only pull the reader further into James Madison's opinion with emotion, but with common sense, and logic. Federalist 51 explains the importance of separation of powers, checks and balances, and what each branch needs to do in order to be successful. James Madison, displays the classical appeal logos, when, in the first sentence of the second paragraph he states that the different and distinct powers of government are "essential to the preservation of liberty." (Pg. 113)…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays