Federalist 10 Summary

Decent Essays
Federalist paper No. 10, written by James Madison, is one of the most influential papers in American History. In this paper he discusses why the new republican from of government is superior to any democratic form of government concerning the constitution. Madison states that each representative will be chosen by a larger number of citizens. That is to say that there will be smaller room for error in selecting unworthy representatives. That being the case, citizens will elect representatives based on merit. Furthermore, Madison states that there should be a mean on the number of electors and that “the constitution forms a happy combination in this respect.” More importantly, the most important interests will be dealt by the national government

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51 Summary

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Madison wrote the Federalist Paper No. 51 specifically to explain to the readers how this new government makes liberty possible. He explains the various checks and balances that have been placed in order to ensure that not one specific branch would have too much power. The Federalist appeared in many different New York newspapers such as The New York Journal and The Daily Advertiser. The Federalist essays were written as responses to the many antifederalist opinions against the Constitution and they were originally intended to be only twenty essays long but were instead continued due to the continued criticisms of the Constitution.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madison is stating that the result of the constitution checks and balances system will help prevent tyranny. In document D, it outlines certain articles of the constitution that say, “Representatives...shall be appointed...according to...population,” and that,“The senate...shall be composed of two senators per state.” This means that the Legislative branch's two parts are equal in representation. As a result of this, no one state will have more power which in turn will prevent tyranny among the…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (p.17). As mentioned in a class discussion, Madison was a Federalist, so he believed in a stronger national government, which may have also been due to…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this document, James Madison explains the reasoning of the Continental Congress’s decision to revise the Articles of Confederation. Many events such as national bankruptcy, tension with the British and problems in Massachusetts occurred and showcased the weaknesses of the current Articles. Madison is quick to proclaim the futility of those Articles unless a provision is placed on them. A solution which various leaders, including Madison, supported was the idea of a centralized government rather than the separate ones in each state.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, Madison’s idea from Federalist 10 was also incorporated into the Constitution. In his essay, he argued the importance of a Republic, opposed to…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalist Paper number ten was written by James Madison to guard against the issues of factions. In any society there will be factions, people with different ideals, religions, and points of view. In a republic this creates the problem of the mob rule, where only to opinion of the majority matters and the rights of the smaller groups are not protected. This is similar to Federalist Paper number nine in which he addressed the destructive role of a faction in breaking apart the republic.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 13 Dbq

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Madison also identifies two ways to eliminate factions such as authoritarianism and conformism. Madison concludes by explaining how the republican form of government addresses the tyranny of the majority problem. In summary, Federalist No. 10 conveys the theory of pluralism that guided the Constitutions chief…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Newly attained independence upon the denouement of the Revolution, provoked fierce debate concerning the proper governmental path. America was divided into two factions: Federalists and Republicans. James Madison in unison with his fellow federalists pursued a centralized government and ratification of the Constitution. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 assembled to address the increasingly overt weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John P. Roche gives his case that proposes that the form of the Constitution was simply a representative development involving a compromise of the interests of the state, economy, and governmental concentrations. In John P. Roche’s argument he states that the government was as democratic as possible: “My concern is with the further position that not only were they revolutionaries, but also they were democrats. Indeed, in my view, there is one fundamental truth about the Founding Fathers…: They were first and foremost superb democratic politicians…”[1]. He continues by stating that what they did was create a practical compromise that would support both the national interest and be something that the people would agree with. They started with the Virginia plan that proposed a bicameral legislative branch.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    • Madison was speaking of bodies of countrymen who make an effort to promote their plans or economic ideals at the price of other citizens or in ways that conflict with the public good. They are also known as special-interest groups. In many governments they have come to control all of the central power, which would be a bad thing as all power would be ruled by one faction that would control the country and not improbably become oppressive. The biggest challenge for the Framers was to organize a government where monopolization would not be conceivable. To produce a political system that would be powerful enough to sustain regulation but would not jeopardize freedom.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Priscilla Etim HIST 1301 Professor James Adams July 26, 2017 The Great Compromise: The Ideals and Values of a Growing Nation The Great Compromise of 1787 is the compromise or the settled agreement of the dispute that erupted due to conflicting views and objectives presented from the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. The purpose of these plans was to create proposed changes to the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the pseudonym Publius, James Madison wrote Federalist Paper #10 to try to encourage the state governments to ratify the constitution. In this essay, Madison argued that a Republic, specifically the Republic proposed within the Constitution, would provide the perfect balance between the rights of the citizens and national security. In a direct democracy, there are no checks in place to ensure that the government is functioning as it should. A few dissenters can gather a following and cause problems within the government. This type of government, according to Madison, gives the people too much power and subsequently fails to effectively maintain social order.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays