The Importance Of Federalism In The United States

Improved Essays
Federalism as we know it today, is a complex and dynamic method of government that divides power between a national government and smaller governmental units. In the United States, the smaller governmental units represent the state/local governments. The United States first started out as a confederation of thirteen states and eventually established a successful federal system. The Founders of this country identified several reasons for creating a federalist government: To evade tyrannical rule and to allow more participation in politics. The key to success of a federal government system is supported through the idea of democracy. Both levels of government have the power to create laws, however, they must abide by the rules of the Constitution. …show more content…
One of the first major events to spark the increasing power in federal government was the American Civil War. Some of the major problems that led to the Civil War dealt with the concept of federalism. Southerners felt that states should be allowed to make their own decisions, such as debating if slavery should be legal. To protect their rights, some states decided to secede from the Union. Lincoln and Congress did not approve of this and would do anything in their power to preserve the Union. During the war, Congress passed a conscription act that produced a wartime draft for U.S. citizens. The act called upon men of various ages, including aliens who were on their way to becoming citizens (History.com Staff, Congress Passes Civil War Conscription Act, 2010). Citizens were expected to abide to these laws and were punished if they didn’t. The government in Washington D.C. expanded its powers under the covers of national emergency. For instance, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus. During the Civil War, Lincoln had jailed journalists, political leaders, newspaper editors, and basically anyone who Lincoln felt tried to hinder his goal of reuniting the country. The people who were put into jail never went through due process, which is a clear violation of the Bill of Rights. In the end, the Union victory paved the way for a stronger national government …show more content…
For instance, after the 9/11 attacks, the national government has increased its regulation over its citizens. An example of this would be the Patriot Act. This Act gave powers to the US Department of Justice and other federal agencies on spy on anybody who they suspected of terrorist activities. As NBC reports “Two provisions of the USA Patriot Act are unconstitutional because they allow search warrants to be issued without a showing of probable cause…” (2007). This is yet another piece of evidence that proves the growing power of the federal government. People who have recognized the immense power of the federal government have argued to give back some powers back to the states. Ever since the 1970’s people have advocated for and adopted a new form of federalism called New Federalism. It is basically “a system which directed money and power away from the federal bureaucracy and toward states and municipalities” (pbs.org, American Experience). All most every president has carried out this new form of federalism since Reagan. It has successfully returned back some of the power through

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    President Lincoln was under serious fire for the document, but he said it was “a necessity of war, to weaken the enemy.” The blacks that were able to escape slavery found refuge in the Union army. President Lincoln’s close friend, Frederick Douglas, pushed him to allow blacks to fight in the war and more importantly for their freedom. From the moment the Emancipation Proclamation was issued, the focus of the war had changed. A Civil War that was being fought to protect either side had turned into a war being fought for the freedom of slaves. Within the first few months following the document, the first African-American troops would serve in the Civil War.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Northerners did not fully back his ideas of emancipation of the slaves and were aggravated for so many Union casualties in war. Lincoln decided to run for president again in 1864 and carried with him the same beliefs as before. The Democrats nominated George B. McClellan for president. McClellan and the Democrats pushed for peace at any cost. He was a former commander of the army.…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The three branches of government consist of the legislative branch, the judiciary branch, and the executive branch. These branches of government also need to have balanced powers, this is where the Checks and Balance system comes in. The Checks and Balance system was created by the Constitution to evenly distribute the amount of power each branch has and to make sure that no one branch has too much power. Each branch of government derives their power from the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution lays out the fundamental laws of the United States, this includes the rights and freedoms of individuals, and the goals of the government.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One such issue was Johnson’s strategy in the Vietnam War, which gained protest from both “hawks” and “doves.” James Burnham, a columnist from the National Review, thought the president was not committed enough to stopping the spread of communism in Vietnam; restrictions on weapons, tactics and strategy hampered the soldier’s ability to fight. He basically recommended that the president remove any restrictions and let the professional military leaders control the operations. On the other side of the argument, many college students in the New Left movement opposed the war completely. In 1965, Paul Potter, the president of SDS, gave a speech at an antiwar rally in Washington, D.C. He told his audience “[the Vietnam War] had exposed the hypocrisy of American policy and the emptiness of Johnson’s solemn words about freedom and democracy.” Potter pointed out, for example, that the United States talked about defending freedom in Vietnam but Diem, an oppressive dictator, was placed into power.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Authoritarian Rule Essay

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Here in the US, during times of war it isn’t uncommon for the government to have a tighter hold over the rights and freedoms of citizens. After the 9/11 terrorist attack, the US entered the “War on Terror” and citizens gave up certain freedoms in the name of national security. Over a decade later, the government has yet to reestablish the proper balance between security and liberty, and continues the passing of laws and policies that undermine civil liberties and government transparency (Rights and the 'War on Terror ',…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monarchy Vs Government

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Like for laws that are made in the US, people have a say whether that law should be passed or not. Some of the laws are passed by government without say from the people just to insure some safety for the people. There are three different forms of democratic government. The three different forms are representative, liberal, and constitutional. Each of these different democratic governments are based on the main ideas of democracy along with government conditions.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists and Democratic-Republicans provided the United States with political parties due to their interpretation of the Constitution, which would eventually evolve and merge the beliefs of the two as time went on. Political parties are important because they play a part in all aspects of the country by helping develop policies, bring new ideas and ensure a variety of choices. The Federalist Party, led by Alexander Hamilton, was one of the first political parties it the United States. The Federalist supported a strong central party with fiscal policies to favor business and banks. The members of this party supported a strong central government, a large peacetime army and navy, and a stable financial system.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith). Even though, it gained little support the south viewed this as a preview as to what was going to come in the future if they did not surrender to the north. For putting Lincoln, in charge the blame for the start of the war laid on the Republican Party for they imposed conditions that could not be fulfilled. The south felt threatened and thought “the only way to save slavery was to secede” (Dickinson). The South cornered the Union to respond to a greater conflict on top of slavery.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to determine if the Civil War was inevitable, we must first look at what the root cause of the Civil War was. The states seceded from the Union, because they had originally been free and were self governing. Since the federal government started to take powers away from the states, relations between the Southern states and the federal government started to become hostile. Had the federal government allowed the states to be self governing, there would not have been a Civil War, but since the federal government continued to trample on the states rights, they felt they had no choice but to secede. After the colonists fought for their freedom from a tyrannical overarching government, they were free…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republicans wanted to solve the problem through antislavery legislation while the radical reformers were quickly rash calling to go to war (94). These were the different ideology of the organizations that influence the methods that Lincoln and Douglass used to abolish slavery. Douglass was impulsive and narrow minded in the sense he only saw one solution to slavery which was the unions going into. As for Lincoln he was the President of the United States who had principles to uphold (132). For instance, he had to make sure the people were satisfied because the United States is base on the Constitution; in which a right is that the United States is for the people and the United States.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays