Compare And Contrast Federal And State Courts

Improved Essays
In the United States of America there are two types of courts, federal and state. Federal courts are created under the Constitution to determine debates involving the Constitution and laws passed by Congress. State courts are created by a state which includes local courts created by cities, counties, and other municipalities. The differences between federal and state courts are defined mainly by jurisdiction. Federal court jurisdiction hear lawsuits against the United States and those involving specific federal laws (e.g., criminal, antitrust, bankruptcy, patent, copyright, and some maritime cases). State courts have a broad jurisdiction and hear cases involving individual citizens (e.g., robberies, traffic violations, contract breaches, family disputes, and probate). This student will be comparing the federal court system to that of my state of residence, Missouri.
Kansas City, Missouri is home to the largest municipal government in the state and is the seat of the Western District of Missouri Court of Appeals Federal representation. The diagram below represents the fundamental idea behind Federalism where the power of government is divided between one national government and state or regional government. This student is comparing the federal court system to the Missouri court system.
The municipal
…show more content…
A circuit judge is elected by all the circuit and associate circuit judges in that circuit to serve as the presiding judge, who serves as the chief administrative officer over all circuit divisions. All legal cases, except certain administrative proceedings and most cases involving "extraordinary" remedies, originate in the circuit court. It has general authority over all civil and criminal matters. Sarah W. Hays is the Presiding Judge and a couple of other circuit judges for Judicial Circuit 16 are: John T. Maughmer, and James C.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between the State and Federal governments is complex and they are broken up into many different parts. Also the State and Federal Governments have different amounts of influence over the economy and the citizens. Another thing is that the government system and relationship between the two is very complex and controversial. This paper will discuss the relationship between the State and Federal governments and the complexity of the systems of government.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Our society continuously evaluates the balancing of powers between the state government and the federal government. It is important in a democracy for the powers to be equally distributed, for if one person in the government takes total control, it would no longer be a democracy. A government with too much power isn’t a good thing, for the society itself would change. One of the main things that helps our society balance the powers between the governments are the three divisions of government. The three branches of government consist of the legislative branch, the judiciary branch, and the executive branch.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All 67 counties in Alabama have their own circuit court. Circuit courts hear all cases involving felony prosecution. They also have the ability to exercise jurisdiction over juvenile and district court cases. Circuit courts hear civil cases when the amount of damages exceeds $10000. Alabama’s has three appellate courts.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The kind of cases handled by the federal district courts are cases relating to alleged Constitutional violations, maritime cases, cases that directly involve a state, cases involving the federal government, and cases that include foreign governments or citizens. The appeals court, on the other hand, addresses exactly what it sounds like. It has direct jurisdiction in cases that involve a challenge to an order of a federal regulatory agency, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission or Department of Homeland Security. There are also a few exceptions to federal jurisdiction, such as the military justice system, which is special and applies only to members of the United States Military and is carried out in the form of non judicial punishments and court martial proceedings (Supreme Court of The United States,…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court is the highest federal court in America. The court consists of The Chief Justice of the U.S. with eight associate judges all nominated by the President of the U.S. They evaluate laws according to and try cases pertaining to the Constitution. The hierarchy under the U.S. Supreme Court is Appellate Courts, Trial Courts, and Federal Courts and boards outside of the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court rules whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal versus State governments hasn’t been equal since the writing of the Constitution and is still going on present day. The state and Federal governments have been affecting lives since the beginning. The constitution granted the Federal government with more superior powers, while the state governments have the lower side of powers compared to the federal. There has been a court case which reduced the states powers, Such as in Sturges v. Crownshield, where the chief justice John Marshall let the states pass bankruptcy laws but couldn’t be applied to debts brought upon oneself before the ratification of the law. John Marshall had many cases which reduced the power of the states.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    South Carolina’s judicial branch of government is notably distinctive when compared to other state’s judicial institutions. South Carolina’s judicial system has drastically evolved over the past fifty years. The state has made great progress in modernizing the structure of its judicial system and its operating procedures in spite of the state’s reputation of being hesitant to change. I believe that South Carolina’s judicial system is one of the better systems in the country because of the progress the state has made restructuring the system and developing a more professionalized and independent judiciary. South Carolina’s unified judicial system consists of six courts: the Court of Appeals, Circuit Courts, Family Courts, Probate Courts, Magistrate…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The drafters were also apprehensive and didn’t want to grant too much federal power, so they limited the jurisdiction of the federal courts by implementing a dual court system between State and Federal, with each having its own key…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Our Federal Court system is primarily composed of three high power jurisdictions that operate much differently than that of the state courts. Federal Courts consist of federal district courts, United States courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court of the United States; however, these courts have limitations in cases that solely focus on the Constitution and federal law. Federal district courts are considered general trial courts that consist of over six hundred and seventy-five district court judges nationwide, and they have ranked the lowest courts out of the entire federal court system. United States courts of appeal, however, are ranked second in the system and are composed of six judges on the first circuit and can reach up to twenty-nine…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court structure in the United States is a dual court system. This means that there is a separate federal system and a separate judicial system locally and for each of the states. The United States Supreme Court is the only place where these two systems connect. The courts have jurisdiction which gives them the authority to hear and decide cases. These jurisdictions are composed of the original jurisdiction, which has the authority to hear the case when it is first brought to the courts.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All death penalty cases and DNA forensic testing cases have an automatic appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Both courts have “nine justices who serve six-year terms. The judges are elected in the general election”, (Brown, pg. 413). The Supreme Court also have the power to answer any questions regarding state law. The duties of the Supreme Court also handles disciplinary actions of judges and attorneys.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Three-Tiered Court System

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the three-tiered structure of the Federal Court System and compare it to the three-tiered structure of the California Court system? What is the purpose and function of each level The three tiered structure of the Federal Court is represented by the US District Courts, US Circuit Court of Appeals and the US Supreme Court's. Each individual level serves as a different function during Criminal and Civil Cases. The three Tiered Structure of California is represented by the Supreme Court, Courts of Appeal as well as Trial Courts.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The court system has a big role in the political process because they evaluate the issues that are brought to them and view them as terms of the legislation and the constitution. Furthermore, the court system is one of the largest in the nation with an estimate of at least two thousand judicial officers and employees. The court has at three levels which are superior courts, court of appeal and supreme court, they all have their own duties to uphold. Superior courts are the ones that take care of misdemeanors such as traffic offenses, felonies and civil suits. As well as this they can operate claim courts where people can bring in cases with damage claims up to a certain amount.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1787: The Judicial System

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Established by the first congress, district courts are charged with hearing trials, hear actual evidence and in these cases have juries that decide the outcome (Wasby, 1988, p.45). Moving from thirteen colonies to fifty states, the district system has grown dependently. Today, Wasby (1988) explains there are 94 district courts representing the nation, each strategically placed within the states. Of all the states, twenty-six states and the District of Columbia have one district court while the rest have two to four residing district…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A local judge is more likely to care more about the outcome, giving cases more attention than a federal judge, because a federal judge does not have to answer to the people. Carson states, “When politicians prioritize local rule instead of trying to force the whole country to agree with them, I think the pursuit of happiness will be within reach of a far greater portion of our populace.” By giving the federal government less power, we enable people of the states to enjoy their freedoms and share their beliefs with likeminded individuals, while living peacefully with those of different opinions. Our states are what makes us unique; New Mexico has a rich Latin culture, Hawaii has strong Asian roots, Louisiana is full of African-American history, Wyoming has fourth generation ranchers, and District of Columbia is essentially a melting pot of people from all over the globe. With so much diversity in our large country, it doesn’t make sense to have one dominant power of government.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays