Federal Bureau Of Investigation Vs. Apple Case Study

Improved Essays
The Federal Bureau of Investigation vs. Apple
On December 2, 2015, there was a mass shooting in San Bernardino, California that claimed more than a dozen lives of innocent people. The attackers Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook, a married couple that lived in Redlands, California. The married couple also attempted to bomb the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health were this malicious crime took place. However, hours later the couple was found and died in a shoot out with law enforcements, after the couple was then pronounced died. This heinous terrorist attack is still under the radar and causing chaos between Apple and the Federal Department of Investigation because FBI officials believes there could be a substantial amount of evidence
…show more content…
The cellular devices have many capabilities such as SIRI, and they are also known for their tight security. Therefore, protecting the privacy of their consumers is vital for this company because once a Apple product is lost or stolen, it then becomes useless for the abductors. However, the Federal Department of Investigation thinks indifferent because according to Greg Keizer “Essentially, what the FBI has asked Apple to do -- with a federal magistrate 's concurrence -- was to make it possible for investigators to brute-force the passcode on the iPhone 5C by subverting iOS 's limitations on entering such codes, as well as removing the auto-wipe feature, triggered when several incorrect passcodes are entered (Keizer, 2016).” The FBI has been cautious about the amount of password attempts to access the December’s terrorist attackers phone. The FBI believes that the IPhone 5c might have vital information stored on the device. …show more content…
Therefore, many people have personal and confidential information stored to their phone and this is what Apple is trying to protect because there are hackers that can hack other’s personal information and use the information to indulge in fraudulent activities. However, these safety measures should only apply for those abiding citizens and not for terrorist groups and other predators such as sex offenders; according to Jonathon Chew, article on fortunate.com “The battle between Apple and the FBI over accessing encrypted data in an iPhone has left Americans evenly divided over the conflict between privacy and national security. In a new poll conducted by the Wall Street Journal and NBC News, around 42% of 1,200 voters surveyed said Apple should cooperate with the FBI and unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters. 47% said Apple shouldn 't cooperate (Chew,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hacking

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I am going to take about how apple had wanted to refuse to unlock a app phone. But the FBI says that they need to unlock the phos so that they can know of there is going to be a fucher attack. But App says they will not because they had already unlock about nine phone. But the FbI had say “that there can be a fucher russon attack”.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fbi Case Study

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has been under flame for the absence of advancement in its move from a law authorization organization to an incorporated knowledge office. Numerous are requiring a huge social change at the organization. This is not another issue for the FBI as they have been battling for quite a long time. They have as of late taken a page from Google and set up "pit fire meeting ranges. " These inventive workspaces are expected to drive social change by empowering a more liquid workplace and make open doors for joint effort.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Apple Vs FBI

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Bryce Hickle Prof. Whitaker Rhetoric 14 March 2017 Apple v. FBI: Apple should have complied Syed Farook is one of the terrorists involved in the massacre that took place in San Bernardino in 2015 which resulted in the murder of fourteen people. Apple v. FBI was a legal dispute involving whether or not Apple should comply with a warrant demanding them to install a back door program into this dead terrorist’s cellphone. People who defended Apple’s position had made claims stating that it was legal for Apple to choose not to comply and that making a back door program would be either not possible, dangerous, or both. However, these statements are not true. Not only was it possible for Apple to comply with the FBI’s demands without endangering…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Killer's Phones

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The government is attempting to find information on a killer's phone according to the New York Times article In Nods to Law Enforcement in Apple Case, by Julian Sanchez. President Obama tries to end the straddle for privacy to divide. President Obama is trying to convince Apple to get into hacking a terrorist phone named Sayed Rizwan Farook, who resides in San Bernardino, California. The NY Post "Can an 18th Century Law Force Apple into Hacking Killer's Phone?" by Shear D. Michael…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple CEO, Tim Cook in his letter in The New York Times, “A Message to Our Customers”, argues that the implication of a backdoor to the iPhone is a threat to data security and puts Apple’s customers at risk. He supports his claim by first explaining what a backdoor is and then explaining how it is a threat to data security, then challenging the FBI’s demands by explaining why it is morally wrong to build the backdoor. Cook’s purpose is to explain Apple’s reasoning as to why they won't cooperate with the government and build a backdoor in order to get into the phone of one of the San Bernardino shooters. He establishes an informative tone for Apple’s customers in order to explain their decision.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boycott Apple Inaccuracies

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This article informs its reader about a comment passed by Donald Trump to a crowd of his followers, a day before the South Carolina GOP primary. In his statement, the Republican candidate said, “Apple ought to give the security for that phone, OK. What I think you ought to do is boycott Apple until such a time as they give that security number. How do you like that? I just thought of it.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the article “Can Your Phone Testify Against You” in the New York Times UPFRONT written by Patricia Smith she states that “Chief Justice Roberts acknowledged that the ruling will make things harder for police. Cell phones can provide valuable incriminating information about dangerous criminals he wrote but, he emphasized, privacy comes with a cost.” An example of how this can be useful is when a person wants to rob a bank or bomb a place. They might have some information that can help law enforcement stop them from committing the crime or can help catch them if they do commit the crime. Important information like where to meet up, where they are going to buy supplies, what day it’s going to happen and why they are doing it is all the information that they say should not be considered private and can be used to stop future crimes.…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Defense of Apple Recently, there's been a dispute between Apple and the FBI. The reason this argument started was due to the mass attack on San Bernardino, California last year. Due to this, there is a discussion about whether a person’s rights outweighs national security. Here, an individual’s rights far outweigh national security, even if the individual in question commits a morally reprehensible act.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These requests would require Apple to make new software for the government that could bypass the security locks on the phone. (Wiki) In December 2015 there was a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. This attacked kill 14 people and injured 22. The two attackers later died in a shootout with the police, after they had destroyed their personal phones.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On June 6th, 2013 The Guardian and the Washington Post revealed the fact that the NSA had access to customer information on Apple, Microsoft, and Google computer products. The information obtained by the NSA was allegedly used to prevent any terrorist actions. However, the NSA has “[built] up a store of information on millions of US citizens, regardless of whether or not they are ‘persons of interest’ to the agency” (Brown). Although terrorist plots are a legitimate threat to America, the U.S government has overstepped its boundaries by violating the citizen’s of America’s fourth amendment right to privacy.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One federal law enforcement agency that I researched was the Federal Bureau of Investigations , known as the FBI. The FBI was created on July , 26, 1908. The FBI was first known as the Bureau of Investigations, this agency did not get the name FBI, until 1935. The first employees for the FBI was 10 former secret service agents they were hired by the department of justice. By 1909, this federal law agency had 34 agents.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iphones, Inc. Case Study

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What the FBI wants Apple to do is write a new code, which is considered a form of speech. It violates the First Amendment rights as forcing speech and going against Apples interests. Gross also continues by saying that Apple is also arguing that this should not be forced upon them because the FBI has not proven that useful information will be found on the phone, it has only been speculated. According to Gross, “The Fifth Amendment protects U.S. residents against the government taking away their liberty” (Gross). What judges could force Apple to do is burdensome and violate their principles.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The source stated that “Comerford had people arriving at his home at odd hours, and he would come and go in the middle of the night.” The source provided the FBI with Comerford’s cell phone number and wireless provider. The FBI decided to corroborate the anonymous tip. The investigation made use of recently purchased surveillance technology known as “the Chum” that captures the IMSI of cellphones. IMSI-catching technology, such as the Chum, enables its users to obtain data from cell phones that reveals a phone’s location.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Opinion about the case The argument about San Bernandino case is like two faces of a coin, which have equal value. If I support the FBI’s point of view, then it will be like I am creating a privacy and a public safety issue for myself as I myself have an iPhone. If I support the point of view of Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, then it means that the terrorist activities will not get solved, which is threatening sign to…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    (Jayakumar, Tahora, 2016) In Apple attitude, the protection and privacy of Apple’s customers and partners estimated at least 1 billion devices (Statt, 2016) dictate their refusal based on the amount of the good for the largest amount of people. Similarly, rights of the users to choose privacy and the integrity of Apple to provide secure and encrypted products to its customers. Moreover, Apple competitive advantages, costs, and level of effort to build a backdoor to the iPhone could have future negative consequences on consumers’ expectations, sentiments, and trust. (Jayakumar, Tahora,…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays