Federal Bureau Of Investigation Vs. Apple Case Study

Improved Essays
The Federal Bureau of Investigation vs. Apple
On December 2, 2015, there was a mass shooting in San Bernardino, California that claimed more than a dozen lives of innocent people. The attackers Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook, a married couple that lived in Redlands, California. The married couple also attempted to bomb the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health were this malicious crime took place. However, hours later the couple was found and died in a shoot out with law enforcements, after the couple was then pronounced died. This heinous terrorist attack is still under the radar and causing chaos between Apple and the Federal Department of Investigation because FBI officials believes there could be a substantial amount of evidence
…show more content…
The cellular devices have many capabilities such as SIRI, and they are also known for their tight security. Therefore, protecting the privacy of their consumers is vital for this company because once a Apple product is lost or stolen, it then becomes useless for the abductors. However, the Federal Department of Investigation thinks indifferent because according to Greg Keizer “Essentially, what the FBI has asked Apple to do -- with a federal magistrate 's concurrence -- was to make it possible for investigators to brute-force the passcode on the iPhone 5C by subverting iOS 's limitations on entering such codes, as well as removing the auto-wipe feature, triggered when several incorrect passcodes are entered (Keizer, 2016).” The FBI has been cautious about the amount of password attempts to access the December’s terrorist attackers phone. The FBI believes that the IPhone 5c might have vital information stored on the device. …show more content…
Therefore, many people have personal and confidential information stored to their phone and this is what Apple is trying to protect because there are hackers that can hack other’s personal information and use the information to indulge in fraudulent activities. However, these safety measures should only apply for those abiding citizens and not for terrorist groups and other predators such as sex offenders; according to Jonathon Chew, article on fortunate.com “The battle between Apple and the FBI over accessing encrypted data in an iPhone has left Americans evenly divided over the conflict between privacy and national security. In a new poll conducted by the Wall Street Journal and NBC News, around 42% of 1,200 voters surveyed said Apple should cooperate with the FBI and unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters. 47% said Apple shouldn 't cooperate (Chew,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The San Bernardino shooting was a tragic event. A cell phone recovered after the shooting has been collected as evidence. Law enforcement believes that unlocking the phone which is an iPhone would help them learn more about the attack and plans. They also believe that this would allow them to intercept future attacks and protect innocent people. Guessing the code incorrectly ten times is believed to erase the data on the phone (Lichtblau).…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, the Apple’s privacy argument is all about safeguarding the public safety of all the good people using their products. On the other hand, the Government’s national security argument is that, the true culprits of the San Bernandino case could be brought be caught and brought into light. Explanation: The current Apple case doesn’t involve a backdoor in the traditional sense. The FBI is asking Apple to create a tool that would circumvent a feature that deletes all of the information on the phone after 10 failed password attempts. Apple doesn’t want to break anyone’s encryption or set a master key loose on the land.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated before, Apple 's best interest is to look out for their customers and the FBI has spent more time over simplifying the truth. The FBI handles their issues much more differently than Apple does, they claim that they only want one piece of software from Apple but later they will undeniably ask for more. Furthermore, according to source G, a similar case to that is the one of Lavabit, when the founder Ladar Levison had to install a pen to obtain the metadata which eventually resulted in his company shutting down. However the FBI demanded for Levison’s company encryption key, the same is likely to happen to Apple if they create the operating system. The FBI operates so they can get whatever they need from a company, whether it 's an encryption key or any additional needed information, they fail to keep in mind that these demands will deteriorate a majority of these companies customer’s privacy.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Apple was resilient against the federal government for the protection of their users. The FBI unlawful overstepped boundaries as a government official. Vivek Wadhwa was quoted in “Apple-FBI battle over San Bernardino terror attack investigation: All the details” saying “Apple is obstructing law enforcement’s [investigation] and effectively aiding terrorists [since] they changed [their] technology” to purposely limit the access of the FBI. Apple has the right to change their intellectual property. Apple was enhancing their security to meet the growing demands of their users and to protect their information.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hacking

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    And my evidence is that only about 51% say that is should be unlocked and about 39% people say that they should not unlocked the phone. But the Apple company is like they should not give the software to the FBI but if they lose the case they will have to unlock the phone. But then the Apple company is have trouble with the FBI but the Apple company has some rules so that they will not unlock the phone. I wonder if the Apple company will still make a updated phone so that the FBI will not get in people phone any more. But I hope the FBI will leave the Apple compon alone and just find some hacker to open it.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    government”Points in Cook’s open letter to Apple’s customer in response to the court order for the iPhone– While overlapping with the points discussed previously, Cook’s letter and the key points expressed from Apple’s perspective well illustrate Cook’s dilemmas (Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016):oThe U.S. government demanded Apple to create the backdoor to the iPhone the company didn’t have or considered too dangerous to create (as cited in Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016). This touches the dilemma Cook had between customer privacy or national security.oThe software the FBI wanted Apple to create for the terrorist’s iPhone had the potential to unlock any iPhone regardless of possession (as cited in Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016). This puts Cook in such dilemma that even international terror groups can exploit the U.S. government’s classified information. oThere was no guarantee that the use of the backdoor would be limited to the San Bernardino case (as cited in Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016). This presented another dilemma for Cook because this might open the flood gate.oBuilding the backdoor defeated the purpose of encryption (as cited in Jayakumar & Tahora, 2016).…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apple prides itself as having the strongest security system against brute force attacks on their devices because of their signature software. This reputation of Apple’s has helped the company become the global leader in smart phone device distribution. The government is asking Apple to place firmware on the phones disabling the latest erase data feature so they can brute force the phone. Essentially, the FBI is asking Apple to hack their own customers. [11] If customers find out about this sabotage they will stop updating their phone and either way the customer lose because they become prone to attacks with outdated protection.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    14 citizens were killed due to the shooting, yet Apple wouldn’t decide to help the FBI. Apple is looked at as a bully, and denying the request from the FBI has started a small war about human rights. People only fear that creating a method to obtain data would fall into the wrong hands, however, with highly specialized encryption every phone user could become a potential threat. We pledge allegiance to our country for security, and honor a code to help the government protect the people. With the FBI being professional, Apple could develop a technique that could be shared to enhance personal security while balancing private security.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The loss of privacy has provided many companies to help the public keep their PII safe such as Lifelock a company invented by a former FBI identity theft agent. The usage of cryptography is a viable way to extract secret or confidential information in the case of US vs Snowden cryptography is how he was exposed as the source of this extraction of information, and the decrypting of this information allowed the US government to name him as the source which will in time become the information to convict him. The loss of privacy for the normal citizen has been comprised in this digital era, but the gain far outweighs what is…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Obama Administration defended the surveillance program saying “ it 's legal, limited and effective with preventing terrorist acts” (www.cfr.org). The surveillance program is effective with preventing terrorist attacks, but this violates the Fourth Amendment right because they are collecting data from everywhere and everyone around the country. According to the News Team staff of cfr.org people are starting to revolt against these outraeous and unlawful actions. Judge Richard J. Leon said “ surely such a program infringes that degree of privacy, that our founding fathers enshrined in the Fourth Amendment” (www.cfr.org). After, the exposure of the NSA in the mid-2013 American citizens have started to protest against these unlawful actions and development movements to protect their right of…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays