An eye for an eye is another fundamental argument in favor
An eye for an eye is another fundamental argument in favor
Is it right? Should we see crime as just being a common misfortune in society? No, absolutely not. Obliterating crime and criminals is our daily obligation and there is no way we can afford to disregard that. Every criminal is entitled to a rightly and just punishment. A person who has multiple unpaid speeding tickets or has done simple shoplifting is not equivalent to a criminal with multiple convictions of murder and should not be recommended the death penalty. There are criminals who kill for…
ambiguous. Among these contended topics is the death penalty. There are many arguments for and against capital punishment. One proponent for the death penalty is Ernest van den Haag who in his article, “The Ultimate Punishment,” argues a case for the death penalty. I believe he successfully counters the arguments against the death penalty leading me to believe it is not something that should be viewed as inhumane and wrong. I will argue that the death penalty is not morally ambiguous but a justified…
as murder or betrayal of one’s county that may result in the death penalty. With the recent increase in horrendous acts around the world, I believe the number of criminals that are sentenced to the death penalty should increase tremendously. The government typically delivers it by lethal injection now but there are other ways that were used in the past such as the electric chair, hanging and use of a gas chamber (Facts about the Death Penalty). To one, it may help deter crimes and further prevent…