Fear And Trembling Kierkegaard Analysis

Improved Essays
Kierkegaard, Camus, and Sartre are three main philosophers that have overlapping ideas of Existentialism. Throughout Kierkegaard 's book Fear and Trembling, Camus’ book Absurd Creation, and Sartre’s book Existentialism and play No exit, the idea of the ability for one to make one’s own choices and decisions through free will is shown. These philosophers opened my eyes to a new perspective on what existence precedes essence means. While reading these books, I agreed with some ideas as opposed to others. I related with Camus’ thoughts on being able to change the way one thinks and with Sartre’s thoughts on existence preceding essence. But, I disagree with Kierkegaard 's thoughts on subjectivity and objectivity and with Sartre’s thoughts on forlornness, anguish, and despair. Because of personal beliefs, I found that I could relate these ideas to my life and to the world around me. In the first book, “The Fear and Trembling” by Kierkegaard, subjectivity and objectivity are two main ideas that are talked about. When one thinks the objective way one is trying to gain truth by eliminating the subjective way and if one thinks the subjective way one is trying to …show more content…
Within Camus’ writings he states everyone is put on this earth to find their path to their future life. He also states we should not base our actions off of what we believe. Absurd Creation challenges us to look at life through a different perspective instead of our everyday beliefs. “If God doesn’t exist, I am God (Camus, pg.106).” Camus tells us that we are in charge of our future and our actions. God does not decide for us, we do. He also tells us to remember hope is hopeless. Camus talks about how life ends with death but everything until that point is our decision. He says that people should not be bound to the idea of life after death because it is holding us back from our fullest

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kierkegaard emphasized personal choice over reason. Kierkegaard is often considered an existentialist not because he found a way to believe in God without needing proof, but because what matters to him is the realization that ultimately believing or not was his choice. 9. Critically analyze Husserl’s phenomenology and how it informed…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The scientists and their methods offer the ways for us to comprehend the situation and to search up the facts that are buried within. In David Hume’s Treatise, the use of anaphora and alliteration imply to the idea that a fact is a contradiction and you can’t reason with a contradiction. Since it’s a fact, it cannot be questioned. Both Hume and Locke believe that people came up with false facts due to the cause and effect method. Since people experience different kinds of situations, the outcome of the cause will create an effect, which they label as a fact.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He creates this way of thinking that senses can change over different phases and ideas cannot just disappear from our minds. He is right about the fact of changing the matter of an object and still having that idea of what that particular object was before it was changed is from your mind. He gives valid reasons, however he has many weaknesses to his argument. In the textbook, Classical Philosophical Questions, Descartes says that “…if an idea is “clear” if its content includes the nature and essence of it” (195). However, how would you explain knowing about something before it happens?…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Demism Theory Of Religion

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They believed that God brought them here and that Typology should be use to interpret his message. It didn’t take long for a new way of thinking to emerge. Deism doctrine states that there is a God. However, God has no control over our lives and it differs from religious believes by not following the Holly book or the idea of more than one God, does not have daily interactions with the world he created, and that redemption and the after life does not exist. Deism was the ideology of our founding fathers, the theory that God is uncaring and uninvolved.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Camus’, de Beauvoir’s, and Kierkegaard’s ideas about reason, disbelief, relation, and the human are discussed in their books: The Myth of Sisyphus by Camus, Pyphus and Cineas by de Beauvoir, and Fear and Trembling by Kierkegaard. Each author has their own idea on how an individual should approach their life. Camus focuses on the individual and their relationship with the absurd, De Beauvoir addresses the importance of an individual from the perspective of others, and while Kierkegaard described the relationship between the universal and absolute. Each author has a different opinion about how decisions regarding their life choices are made. De Beauvoir’s description of the individual and their projects is different from the other two existentialists…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia Be Legalized

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Death is something that is religiously viewed as a part of the life cycle, just like birth. We do not get to choose our moment of birth and it is argued that we should not be capable of choosing our time of death (Dimanno, 3). Death is only controlled by god and most people with strong religious beliefs think that it should stay that way. Although death is a part of life, that does not mean people should not be allowed to control it. Arguing that God should choose our death, without any real evidence of God is not enough to stop people from proceeding with the act of euthanasia.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore they believed that God is the only one who can decide when a patient end has come and the terms of it. Society feels that it is god 's task to determine when one of his creations time has come, and human beings are in no position to behave as god and end their lives or others. When humans take it upon themselves to shorten their lives or to have others to do it for them they are playing God. They argue that society is being asked to approve a form of state sanctioned murder. “Even if the individual feels his or her life no longer has meaning, has been deprived of sense of autonomy, or should not be held hostage to someone else’s definition of life’s value, society cannot legitimate assisting or accelerating that individual’s premature death.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Hamlet's worried that he will go against his religion which is Christian as in Christian, all acts that can lead to taking one’s own life is strictly forbidden. It is believed that everything such as birth and death are determined God. Hamlet does consider suicide, but resists because of the Christian belief that suicide, is an unforgiven sin, would disqualify the soul from finding eternal rest in heaven with God. Hamlet is saying that nobody would choose to live in a pain and misery life except that they are reluctant and fearful of what will happen to them after they commit suicide. He questions in his mind why should a human end his problems and trouble in this temporary world to risk an eternity of peace above after life?…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “To fear death, gentlemen, is no other than to think oneself wise when one is not, to think one knows what one does not know.” (Apology, 29A). Socrates himself does not fear death. He compares fearing death to having a false wisdom because in order to fear something, one must at least know some detail about what exactly one fears. This false wisdom is detrimental because it illustrates a sign of comfort and understanding when in actuality, there is only confusion and disbelief. As no one knows the definite outcome of dying, it makes death truly unfamiliar to all.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simmias’ does not understand why the souls lives on after the body dies, he argues that once the body dies then the soul must die with the body. On the other hand, Cebs argues that he does not believe that the soul is immortal. He knows that we cannot see the soul but just because we don’t see it does not mean it’s…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays