Fdr Vs Nixon Analysis

In the course of human events, it sometimes becomes necessary for Americans to evaluate their former presidents to determine how their actions affected the nation and whether they serve as beneficial role models for future presidents. The two presidents of the twentieth century that provide the most contrast in this regard are Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who served from 1933 until his death in 1945, and Republican Richard Milhous Nixon, who served from 1969 until his resignation in 1974 (“The Franklin”; “The Richard”). Roosevelt is widely considered to be a much more effective president than Nixon since Roosevelt helped lead the US out of the Great Depression, maintained good relations with Congress in passing New Deal legislation, and involved …show more content…
Roosevelt left a significant legacy in both domestic affairs through the New Deal programs that combatted the Great Depression, and in foreign affairs through his critical part in the Allied victory in World War II. Within the context of his time, he remains one of the most influential presidents in American history for saving the capitalistic system from destruction and for raising his nation to the status of a world superpower. In contrast, Nixon severely damaged the presidency and the credibility of the government with his role in the Watergate scandal. His lack of achievement in domestic policy adds to his unsuccessful administration, though part of the blame does lie with the Democratic Congress that opposed many of Nixon’s proposals. In foreign policy, Nixon did succeed at forging a long-lasting relationship with China when previously it had been unthinkable to develop ties with such a staunchly communist nation. Despite this, Nixon’s legacy is one of shame and defeat. As the only American president to ever resign, his name lives on in political