On April 26, 2013, the New York Times published an article written by an a woman named Lindas Logan. Logan, divorced and mother of three, decided to bring us along on a journey. The journey consisted of what she went through during her worst depression stage and how she was treated. She identified that she doesn’t really know when her bipolar depression started to kick in. It got bad to a point where she was distancing herself from her family and her kids. She checked herself into multiple mental hospitals. She told us about the errors of how doctors tend to treat people with bipolar disorder. Multiple tests would be ran, they would see if her facial expressions and eye contact improved and medication would be given to improve her mood.If
…show more content…
It wasn 't too complicated to understand. She made it just so that you could have a vivid image in your head that made you get what she was talking about. She didn 't use simple words or phrases. She didn’t use mediocre vocab to say she was a smart person, she used prestigious. Her language wasn 't difficult to the point where you were confused, but it wasn 't so simple that the middle schooler could understand exactly what she was trying to get at. One disadvantage about this article is that the author did not involve many details needed to just use her article and her article only to write a research paper. It is good enough for a student who would need multiple sources for a paper to use hers, but just solely based on one article.
Logan’s article is current based on the date of publication. Her article, stated early, that it was published in 2013. Not much has changed between the last three years on the way we treat bipolar disorders. Because her article was written in a fashionably relevant time, it shows that her article credible. It wasn’t written so long about that a new method was presented.
Overall, the article is credible and could be used at a college level. Logan presented that she has had more than one experiences in different locations; showing that she collected many data. Because this situation happened only three years ago, the currency is new. Logan use of language allows the reader to understand her meaning in an intellectual
It wasn 't too complicated to understand. She made it just so that you could have a vivid image in your head that made you get what she was talking about. She didn 't use simple words or phrases. She didn’t use mediocre vocab to say she was a smart person, she used prestigious. Her language wasn 't difficult to the point where you were confused, but it wasn 't so simple that the middle schooler could understand exactly what she was trying to get at. One disadvantage about this article is that the author did not involve many details needed to just use her article and her article only to write a research paper. It is good enough for a student who would need multiple sources for a paper to use hers, but just solely based on one article.
Logan’s article is current based on the date of publication. Her article, stated early, that it was published in 2013. Not much has changed between the last three years on the way we treat bipolar disorders. Because her article was written in a fashionably relevant time, it shows that her article credible. It wasn’t written so long about that a new method was presented.
Overall, the article is credible and could be used at a college level. Logan presented that she has had more than one experiences in different locations; showing that she collected many data. Because this situation happened only three years ago, the currency is new. Logan use of language allows the reader to understand her meaning in an intellectual