consumers believe that GMO foods should be labeled accordingly. Similar results are seen throughout several years and countless different polls, so why are GMO products still left unlabeled? A large reason that GMOs are protected from being exposed is the idea of "substantial equivalence" which came about in early 1996. The concept of substantial equivalence allowed permission to market and sell new foods without any safety or toxicology tests as long as they were not too different in chemical composition to foods already on the market (FDA GRAS proposal). With this sort of thinking, the one’s in charge believe that since there isn’t any solid evidence of the long-term effects of GMOs, they can continue to go
consumers believe that GMO foods should be labeled accordingly. Similar results are seen throughout several years and countless different polls, so why are GMO products still left unlabeled? A large reason that GMOs are protected from being exposed is the idea of "substantial equivalence" which came about in early 1996. The concept of substantial equivalence allowed permission to market and sell new foods without any safety or toxicology tests as long as they were not too different in chemical composition to foods already on the market (FDA GRAS proposal). With this sort of thinking, the one’s in charge believe that since there isn’t any solid evidence of the long-term effects of GMOs, they can continue to go