Fast Food Is Healthier Than Lunch Food

Fast food can actually be healthier than lunch food. Fast food may have quality meat, depending on which fast food restaurant, but it is very high in calories, carbohydrate, oil, and fat. Lunch food may use different meat, depending on which school it is, but there are standards for what meat and food is being sold in schools, which for that, students can be eating healthily. Admittedly, fast food can be healthy, but one reason fast food should not be served at schools is that it is clearly not healthy food for academic abilities because of fast food containing many chemicals that aren’t safe for students to eat, especially when eating it everyday. Another reason is that fast food can lower academic performance for many students. The last reason is that fast food is the cause for diseases, leading students to probably feel sick if they aren’t eating the right foods. …show more content…
Fast food would be nice as an option for students for eat, but the only reason that fast food should be served as lunch is if the cafeteria food is not hitting standards or expectations. Cafeteria food is good enough, better than fast food, because cafeteria food is healthier, and can make students more focused and ready to learn, than not eating anything or eating fast food, according to jagranjosh. Cafeteria food is better than fast food because cafeteria food is not like fast food; fast food has a lot of unhealthy stuff in it. Cafeteria food is just as good as fast food. The reason why is because cafeteria food can be more healthier, but it isn’t as fast as fast food. Fast food is most likely not to be healthy, but it is very fast to process and