Farmer vs Monsanto:
The world of agriculture is just like the board game monopoly. Monopoly is a fun
game for all ages,where players move around the board buying or trading properties, developing their
properties with houses and hotels, and collecting rent from their opponents, with the goal being to
drive them into the ground with bankruptcy. Major companies like Walmart, Tyson Food, and
Monsanto use the same processes with small shareholder farmers through out the stateside and the
world. One in particular Monsanto represent the players that take force to their opponents(shareholder
farmers) by bribing them with endless amminities for seeding to partner with their farm …show more content…
With genetically engineered crops you have a little resistant on everyday trouble an organic
farmer would have to struggle through. Pro #3: with GMO 's, scientist can sucessfully create perfect
crops for produce and they can do it buy the masses. With future products experts indicate that the 2nd
wave of GMO 's will try to target consumer and animal heath issues and improve the nutrition content
of certain foods. Con #3: even though these ideas of better appealing to the customers can work they
are still covering the fact that they have been falsy avertized by themself to the public.
Monsanto has falsified data on Roundup’s safety, and marketed it to parks departments and consumers
as very “environmentally friendly” and “biodegradable,"to encourage its use on roads enbankments,
playgrounds, golf courses, schools, lawns and home gardens. One foriegn court ruled those
marketing claims amounted to false advertising.
As you see now the introducing of these GMO 's, companies are now using this to bribe farmers into a better life
consequentially taking over at the end,
The world of agriculture is just like the board game monopoly. Monopoly is a fun
game for all ages,where players move around the board buying or trading properties, developing their
properties with houses and hotels, and collecting rent from their opponents, with the goal being to
drive them into the ground with bankruptcy. Major companies like Walmart, Tyson Food, and
Monsanto use the same processes with small shareholder farmers through out the stateside and the
world. One in particular Monsanto represent the players that take force to their opponents(shareholder
farmers) by bribing them with endless amminities for seeding to partner with their farm …show more content…
With genetically engineered crops you have a little resistant on everyday trouble an organic
farmer would have to struggle through. Pro #3: with GMO 's, scientist can sucessfully create perfect
crops for produce and they can do it buy the masses. With future products experts indicate that the 2nd
wave of GMO 's will try to target consumer and animal heath issues and improve the nutrition content
of certain foods. Con #3: even though these ideas of better appealing to the customers can work they
are still covering the fact that they have been falsy avertized by themself to the public.
Monsanto has falsified data on Roundup’s safety, and marketed it to parks departments and consumers
as very “environmentally friendly” and “biodegradable,"to encourage its use on roads enbankments,
playgrounds, golf courses, schools, lawns and home gardens. One foriegn court ruled those
marketing claims amounted to false advertising.
As you see now the introducing of these GMO 's, companies are now using this to bribe farmers into a better life
consequentially taking over at the end,