Famine In A Modest Proposal

Improved Essays
Swift wrote “A Modest Proposal” to suggest essentially that farming babies was the way to battle famine. While this is more or less a joke, the article addressed that beggars with children that they raise to be beggars are a burden on society. The real question is how do we fix this problem. Swift wants any opposing arguments to have a solution as to, “how they will be able to find food and raiment for a hundred thousand useless mouths and backs.” This statement brings up the main point I found in this paper, why are the poor having children they can't afford? This is definitely a problem we struggle with in this day and age. There is so many people who can't take care of themselves, yet they still have children. This just ends

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If they abuse what they get they will be equally just as poor. Also, those who may be offered a job of some sort may not want to work. The strength of his argument is that he has a general idea of what would be done to fix the poor problem and has a series of suggestions on how to do it. Jonathan Swift is trying to fix the problem with the people that are starving or are without clothing. He uses satire for an outrageous claim about eating children to give the poor money in order to fix the problem.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Swift proposes “he shall take in whole number infants at a certain age who are born of parents in effect as little able to support them as those who demanded our charity in the streets”() Though, who said those parents want to hand over the children to be the communities meat market. Swift also introduces another “great” advantage to his scheme, that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, although this is not a logical or rational thought. If the practice of eating children were to happen people who no longer perceive each other the same – one could just consider everyone eating flesh! Also, what Swift doesn’t realize is if selling children for food were to happen, the abortion rate might go down but that might correlate to people having…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Preference Utilitarian Peter Singer maintains that it is a moral wrong for those in affluent countries to not do more to prevent starvation in other parts of the world. Singer formulates this argument in his paper ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’. Singer argues from the side of consequentialism, in particular Utilitarianism; an ethical philosophy in which the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society is considered the greatest good. Several philosophers have countered Singer’s theory, claiming that our moral duties are lessened by the distance of those suffering in other parts of the world. Moreover, critics of consequentialism argue that it does not allow agents to act in accordance with their own needs.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer’s paper “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” analyses the ethical and moral responsibility of those living in relative affluence and their actions pertaining to famine relief in less economically advantaged parts of the world. Singer calls for much greater action, and a cultural shift in priority and attitude towards those suffering, no matter their proximity to the reader. While Singer’s writing is focused specifically on the 1971 Bengali Famine, the ideals proposed are applicable for modern situations as well. Singer begins by outlining the fact that, if willing, first-world nations and their citizens are more than capable of alleviating states of famine in the third-world, but have not provided assistance of a high enough quantity to do so. This, according to Singer, is morally wrong.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Moral Comparability In Famine, Affluence, and Morality by Peter Singer, he argues that we are morally obligated to donate as much money to charity as we can to help limit poverty in the world. Singer explains that there are many people in the world suffering from poverty, and living very poor-quality lives as a result of poverty. He argues that poverty is morally wrong because of the suffering it promotes. Singer believes it is the moral obligation of humans to donate as much as they can to help limit the suffering of the poor in the world, without sacrificing anything moral comparability. In this paper, I will argue that Singer uses vague language to describe what the line is for moral comparability.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eating children is a horrid plan yet with reasons that make sense. How can this be the slightest bit of truth? In a Modest Proposal, by Jonathan Swift, the author’s main topic is eating infants and selling their bodies and skin to supposedly solve the problems in the kingdom of Ireland. Although, to make things perfectly clear his proposal is an exaggeration only to bring light to the economical problems as well as to help the reasonable solutions sound more pleasing and accessible. Swift’s macro-structure consists of the article introducing the reason for his proposal, the middle explains his plan and list the supposed good outcomes of eating children, but in the end he explains his true thoughts.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, if Swift was not quite informed of the subject and of other proposals and willing to consider all other proposals if his proposal was not sound and also the best option for Ireland, then he would have no reason to introduce and share it. “A Modest Proposal” was Jonathan Swift’s satirical proposition on how Ireland should solve its economical and hunger problems. Swift was able to convince the readers of his pamphlet that while it may seem absurd, the idea of consuming infants could truly be advantageous for Ireland. Through his tone, diction, and careful word choice, Swift was able…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In clergyman Johnathan Swift’s essay, A Modest Proposal, Swift presents a proposal that small children should be sold for food. Swift supports his proposal by providing examples of how selling the small children would be beneficial, describing how his proposed system would be set up, and also by supporting his proposal with logical evidence that shows he spent time creating a well-crafted argument. Swift’s purpose is to present an absurd proposal in order to show how absurd the poverty level in Ireland. He hopes to inspire an improvement in the country with the repeal of many penal laws set by Ireland’s mother country England.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Modest Proposal, written by Jonathan Swift, is a satirical essay from 1729. In the essay, Swift describes the circumstances and the amount of Irish people throughout Great Britain living in poverty, along with the lack of assistance from the English. He writes about how the Irish’s situation could have improved if they were willing to sell their children (especially babies) as food for the people of wealth in Great Britain. Unlike in the Wizard of Oz, the Irish females in A Modest Proposal don’t experience self-realization. They have no confidence in themselves or want to improve their lifestyles whatsoever.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the two articles, “Famine, Affluence, And Morality” by Peter singer and “ World Hunger And Moral Obligation: The Case Against Singer” by John Arthur Talks generally about ethics, To be more specific, they talk about the self of need of what is the moral right thing to do and the duty of what is someone 's job as a human to do for others. Both have different arguments and to get straight to the point, Singer believe that the right moral thing to do is help others when you can regardless of the situation or distance you are from. We must take away more bad from the situation and leave more good. This does not mean everyone should have the same amount of good but as long as we take away the bad, we can all leave it fair for everyone with no…

    • 1084 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout "A Modest Proposal" Swift throws some extreme solutions that only show incongruity and a sound of radical ideas the people of Ireland should take into account . That is to say, in the passage Swift goes on to signify this incongruity by speaking over his acute ideas of "let's eat babies" or "we can make gloves out of kids" to diminish this time of catastrophe of his land of Ireland. For this purpose, Swift goes on to testify the point of what the entire passage really means and where the incongruity shows it's true colors. To enumerate, in paragraph 29 Swift speaks over on how the civilians of Ireland must do what he says to make an improvement to fix the crisis in Ireland by supporting their own country financially and emotionally.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do not have kids The world is littered with kids. Good or bad the children create a burden on life and society. There should be some criteria to be met to have children, like financial stability, the mental state of being willing to give up certain amenities, and health conditions.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays