Fair Use: Video Analysis

Improved Essays
n the video a Fair(y) use tale, It follows all the qualifications that goes under fair use. The definition of fair use is copyright material that in circumstances such as quotes, critisum, news reportings, teaching, and research, without needed permission or purchase from the copyright holder, you can use it. In Fair(y) use tale it is a video about Fair use, it gives examples, definitions with clips and small portions of Disney cartoons. Disney has a very strict policy and guidelines about showing a using these movies. Things that disney want you to use before you use there work is, contact between you and them, the disney services, your content and account, paid transactions, competitions, submissions and unsolicited Ideas and Policies, claims of copyright …show more content…
Faden wasn't in the wrong making this video, he was proving a point on ways to get around copyright because Disney has to be one of the strictest ones out there. Faden made this so he could show viewers that is you use your own ideas you can accomplish things that prove big points. What he made it a parody if you will. He edited it put his thoughts and work into it and made it his own. Comments under this video tell you many other things that Faden did so he would pass through copyright with no blood on his hands. A comment from InchonDM said β€œFor those who are complaining about the medium: the format of this video was done very specifically to use only a certain amount of footage from each individual movie. More than that, and you wind up breaking copyright.” i think he said that because so many people were saying how this is a bad idea and how he will probably get into a lot of trouble. Like Tyler Horbacio he said β€œ how ironic would it be if this got taken down for copyright.” but the funny thing is, it can't, because it falls under fair

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This particular case addressed all factors of the fair use doctrine. University City Studios had legitimate claims but, all claims were turned down on favor of Sony. At the beginning, the U.S. District Court determined that Betamax contributed to copyright infringement. A later Supreme Court analysis reversed the District Court decision. The court concluded that it was the users who infringed on copyright law. Here is an analysis of the events: Universal City Studios argued that they are the only…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent news, there has been a lot of concern over how Copyright Laws are defined and enforced, and exactly how Fair Use contributes to the discussion. In the United States, Copyright Laws are put in place to protect people who create new works such as music, art, literature, or computer programs, in order to provide and secure the original owner the right to reproduce and sell their work for profit. However, recent examples have shown that, although they can beneficial to those who produce creative…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dianna George Changing the Face of Poverty: Nonprofits and the Problem of Representation by Diana George asses the way that poverty is pictured by nonprofit organizations. Particularly, George focuses on videos produced by Habitat for Humanity. George presents the argument that the use of video portraying poverty is not fully showing what poverty is. George critiques Habitat for Humanity for focusing on one particular type of poverty and its solution without realizing or showing the broader spectrum…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays