FSA Pre-assessment In the chance that I would have a say in the use of another artist's music within the school blog, it would be rejected. Even though others could use the music as a way of promotion or advertising for the artist, the use of a song from another artist has a multitude of negative outcomes which could occur from the implementation of music from another musician which includes loss of money, face and also criticism from peers and fans which adversely affect the artist(s) and the user of the music.
The use of an artist's music creates a possibility for dissatisfaction from peers, readers, fans, and critics as well as creating a loss of reputation for both the artist(s) and the blog. According to Alex Scally, from the indie-pop …show more content…
By sharing music on a third party website or access area, the artist will gain less money than from direct downloads "According to data journalist David McCandless, a signed solo artist would need about 5,478 iTunes downloads of a song per month versus 4,200,000 YouTube streams per month just to make the U.S. minimum wage." (Carter, Source 1). By the use of third party applications vs direct downloads, the artist or musician can face a lot of loss in income which leads to the need of new income sources. Even with tours and such, the band will still lose money due to costs of the tour and reduction of concert attendees which still impact the net income of the artist. "Out of the $600 of gross income per night that a mid-level touring band such as his typically makes, they will be left with only $78.75 of net income after deductions for all their other costs . . . hotel costs, which are usually $50–$60 per night. . . end of the tour . . . losing more money than it makes." (Coates, Source 3). The cost of the touring plus living expenses as well as maintenance and the loss of income due to third-party sources, the artist will lose even more money than previously possessed, which can lead to the turning to corporations. By going back to corporations, the artist can then lose even more money and reputation as well as fans, from ads and "musical spam". This can be
The use of an artist's music creates a possibility for dissatisfaction from peers, readers, fans, and critics as well as creating a loss of reputation for both the artist(s) and the blog. According to Alex Scally, from the indie-pop …show more content…
By sharing music on a third party website or access area, the artist will gain less money than from direct downloads "According to data journalist David McCandless, a signed solo artist would need about 5,478 iTunes downloads of a song per month versus 4,200,000 YouTube streams per month just to make the U.S. minimum wage." (Carter, Source 1). By the use of third party applications vs direct downloads, the artist or musician can face a lot of loss in income which leads to the need of new income sources. Even with tours and such, the band will still lose money due to costs of the tour and reduction of concert attendees which still impact the net income of the artist. "Out of the $600 of gross income per night that a mid-level touring band such as his typically makes, they will be left with only $78.75 of net income after deductions for all their other costs . . . hotel costs, which are usually $50–$60 per night. . . end of the tour . . . losing more money than it makes." (Coates, Source 3). The cost of the touring plus living expenses as well as maintenance and the loss of income due to third-party sources, the artist will lose even more money than previously possessed, which can lead to the turning to corporations. By going back to corporations, the artist can then lose even more money and reputation as well as fans, from ads and "musical spam". This can be