Eyewitness Testimony Paper

Decent Essays
Emeka Banye
100591857
Submitted in partial fulfillment of
The requirements for
PSYC 3210U
Foundations for Academic Learning and Success
Bachelor of Arts in Forensic Psychology

Faculty of Social Science of Humanities
University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Oshawa, Ontario

Dr. Karla Emeno
Davut Akca March 27th 2016 Introduction
Eyewitness testimony has been a very important aspect towards forensic psychology and convicting offenders. This paper will be argued towards the aspect of how new research has applied to eye witness testimonies and its importance towards dealing with future cases to prevent wrongful convictions. The first section of this paper covers the topics of the CSI-effects involvement in the criminal justice system and whether there is a strong correlation between
…show more content…
It was found that watching, “a) CSI dramas had no independent effect on jurors’ verdicts, b) the exposure to CSI dramas did not interact with individuals characteristics and c) different individual characteristics were significantly associated with different types of evidence” (Kim et al., p. 453). A major issue is the effect media (CSI drama) has on the system. There have been debates about the CSI-effect in legal & social science communities. It is believed that jurors frequently exposed to forensic programs will be more likely to acquit a guilty defendant if there is a lack of scientific evidence, compared to jurors that was not exposed to forensic programs (Kim et al., 2009). “The methodology for examining a CSI-effect had initial studies which presented findings in a very basic statistical manner” (Kim et al., p. 455). A multivariate & path analyses was used to determining stranger evidence whether the CSI-effect has a strong correlation or no correlation at all. Results in the study found that, non-white jurors were more willing to convert defendants (p

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Randy Furst’s article “Black defendants, white jurors: Does race make a difference in the court?” is about racism and reveals that an all white jury is more likely to demonstrate racial prejudices against a defendant of color as demonstrated by his use of evidence. Specifically, Furst’s use of evidence suggests that on a mixed jury, jurors will acquit a non-white defendant more times than an only white jury. The first insight into the racism that non-white defendants have to face occurs when Larry Leventhal, Twin Cities defense attorney, says “‘I think it would be a challenge to get a jury that considers all the factors when the jury is white,’”(1). Leventhal’s reference to juries considering factors while white demonstrates that if a jury…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Csi Effect Examples

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages

    But the CSI effect does have some negative outcomes. For example now people believe unrealistic hopes in what justice can do. They don’t realize that a lot things can play factor into the mistakes in evidence. Due that, Jurors should be screened to see if their judgment is being tainted by fake crime shows. If the jurors…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Eyewitness Testimonies

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    AFRICAN AMERICANS WRONGLY CONVICTED 3 Why Are African Americans More Likely to Be Wrongly Convicted in the United States? Introduction Imagine, you are just minding your business walking down a street and an officer stop you to bring you to the station to question you. The next thing you know you are being charged for a crime you didn’t commit.…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Holloway pointed out, eyewitness testimony plays a significant role in sending innocent people to prison (Holloway, 2015). Yet, I feel that she only vaguely covered the topic. Because eyewitness testimony is a major component of the American criminal justice system, Holloway should have better emphasized the faultiness of eyewitness…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A popular television show, “CSI”, is impacting not only the viewers, but also the criminal justice system. On the show, a crime is investigated, analyzed, and a conviction is made in an hour. While the span of the show may be a few days to a few weeks, in reality some investigations take months, even years, before a conviction. It has created a phenomena known as the “CSI Effect” and is basically exactly what it states. How has this television show, “CSI”, played an impact on the criminal justice system and also the crime labs?…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CSI Effect Essay

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Criminal justice practitioners are changing their behavior to accommodate the perception that jurors want scientific evidence” (p.383-399). As this study, has shown, jurors are not influenced particularly by CSI or any of the many other television shows of that genre. It is clear, however, that jurors do significantly expect that prosecutors will use the advantages of modern science and technology to help meet their burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Donald Shelton (2010). Up to now, there has not been a lot of research covered proving that the watching crime television and verdict decisions simulated criminal trials.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the main causes of wrongful convictions is eyewitness misidentifications. Despite a high rate of error (as many as 1 in 4 stranger eyewitness identifications are wrong), eyewitness identifications are considered some of the most powerful evidence against a suspect. Why are eyewitness identifications subject to such a high rate of error? There are numerous reasons for this: (1) witnesses are subject to high stress or anxiety; (2) the human memory tends to reconstruct incidents because humans do not have the capability to record memories like a video recorder; (3) witnesses often focus on weapons, not the identity of the perpetrator; (4) suggestive eyewitness identification procedures used by police or prosecutorial agencies; and (5) cross-racial…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The value of eyewitness evidence depends on how strong it is from the beginning and whether it is preserved or tested properly. If the evidence is weak then it cannot be processed as a valuable report from the crime because there can be various mistakes such as description errors or the accuracy of what happened in the crime scene. In the documentary “Murder on a Sunday Morning” (2002) the eyewitness identification in…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Illusory Causation in the Courtroom, published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, G. Daniel Lassiter explores illusory causation in terms of the role it plays in courtrooms. This is the possibility of the effect that camera perspective has on jurors’ judgements on the suspect’s guilt, whether it was a voluntary confession and sentence recommendations. The Death Penalty Information Center had documented cases in which death row inmates were released due to new evidence and in many cases, the cause of wrongful convictions can be traced back to the interrogation phase in which false confessions are extracted. Many experts believe that the solution to suspects being coerced into wrongful confessions are videotaping confessions.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balancing the tension between community interest and individual rights and freedoms are a significant component of the criminal trial process and is relatively successful in that retrospect. In order to be effective and efficient the criminal trial process should reflect the moral and ethical standards of society, ensure the community is sufficiently protected and respects the rights of the individual. However, despite efforts to achieve justice for all members of society, the criminal trial process does fail to provide adequate success in some areas of the law such as the jury system, Legal Aid and the provocation defence. All these areas to an extent highlight the lack of success the criminal trial process serves in balancing community interests…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Eyewitness Testimony

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited

    In conclusion, both an eyewitness and the reasonable person provide standards in the court of law that are used in determining whether to convict a suspect, as demonstrated by the eyewitness in the State v. Hendersen (2011) case. Unfortunately, both standards are based upon subjective perception. For example, human error in memory processing may decrease the accuracy in an eyewitness testimony. Research should be done on individual interpretation as it relates to an eyewitness or the reasonable person in order to prevent any wrongful…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 5 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An issue in developmental psychology that is a common topic of research is the question of whether or not the testimony of young children can be trusted. Can they recognize perpetrators or even remember events accurately? The answers to these questions should inform how children are questioned as eyewitnesses in the courtroom, and since many people aren’t as educated in this topic, it important for a policy to be implemented to ensure that findings from recent research are being used to effectively utilize children as eyewitnesses. There are three main topics of applicable research that I will discuss in this paper, and they are: use of initial exhaustive recall to avoid retrieval-induced forgetting, eye closure in recalling events, and repeating…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brenton Butler Case Study

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In a study done by Steven D. Penrod and Brian L. Cutler, eyewitness identification was tested to find the most reliable effects on eyewitness performance. The studies that they performed indicated that jurors ' evaluations of identification evidence are heavily influenced by the confidence of the eyewitness. Unfortunately, in this case and in many other cases, the confidence of the eyewitness did not matter because he still identified the wrong man. The correlation between confidence and accurate eyewitness identification is weak (Penrod & Cutler, 1989). Because the victim’s husband was so confident in his identification, the cops did not feel obligated to find all of the evidence that they needed to prosecute Brenton.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Forensic Child Witnesses

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Every year there are hundreds of thousands of children who are suffering from, or witnessing crime (Hobbs, Johnson, Goodman, Bederian-Gardner, Lawler, Vargas, & Mendoza, 2014). Sometimes, these children also serve as witnesses in forensic investigations and proceedings, especially in cases involving sexual abuse, or in cases where there may be no visible evidence or physical indications of a crime, therefore relying on the child’s eyewitness memory (Hobbs et al., 2014). Ever since colonial times in the United States, there has been a great deal of skepticism about the testimony of child witnesses, until the 1970s and 1980s when there was an increase in empirical research on the credibility of child witnesses (Ruby, 1997). It was also during…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For Gould this was the most surprising result of his research because he and his team expected strong prosecutorial cases to result in wrongful convictions since the evidence was compelling for the prosecutor to seek conviction but instead the study revealed the contrary. This led the team to look at weak defense counsel, poor explanation/presentation of forensic evidence, and police practices that could trigger the course of events spiraling out of control to a wrongful conviction because the weak prosecution case in turn is not adequately challenged by the defense attorney and the prosecution for one reason or the other may fail to disclose exculpatory evidence- a Brady violation (NIJ…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays