The participants were shown two films involving the same people. One of the films had physical assault. The participants who viewed this version of the film were less likely to identify the people involved than those who viewed the non-violent film. They did this on visual imagery and wording of questions. Clifford and Hollin (1981) then examined the relationship the level of violence and recall. They found out that the more violence there was the participants didn’t recall as well. This could be due to violent incidents draw the focus of the witnesses’ attention meaning they don’t process or process little of any other information. Or violent incidents increase anxiety which as stated from the Yerkes-Dodson Curve effects memory. This is unrepresentative of a real-life situation however, as they were expecting to watch a crime scene and focus, their accuracy of recall may have been different in a real life
The participants were shown two films involving the same people. One of the films had physical assault. The participants who viewed this version of the film were less likely to identify the people involved than those who viewed the non-violent film. They did this on visual imagery and wording of questions. Clifford and Hollin (1981) then examined the relationship the level of violence and recall. They found out that the more violence there was the participants didn’t recall as well. This could be due to violent incidents draw the focus of the witnesses’ attention meaning they don’t process or process little of any other information. Or violent incidents increase anxiety which as stated from the Yerkes-Dodson Curve effects memory. This is unrepresentative of a real-life situation however, as they were expecting to watch a crime scene and focus, their accuracy of recall may have been different in a real life