Eye For An Eye, Right Or Wrong?

Improved Essays
Eye for an Eye, Right or Wrong Over the centuries, we all have heard the phrase “eye for eye, tooth for tooth.” (The Holy Bible, Exodus 21:24)1. There have been thousands of discussions about this topic; is it right, is it wrong, or is it only on occasions. Most say the penalty of “eye for an eye”, or the law of restitution should be abolished others say it is a necessity of our federal punishment system. The necessity of this kind of punishment is not as needed as it was when it was first established around the 6th century BCE (Hammurabi's Code: An Eye for an Eye, ushitory.org)2. Nowadays the punishment of “eye for an eye” is widely viewed as inhumane or unjustified, or altogether wrong.
As most of us have heard in Sunday school how Moses told the Israelites that “eye for an eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,” is an equivalent punishment for the crime that was committed (The Holy Bible, Exodus 21:24)1. Most people today will say that this kind of punishment is to server, and it should be abolished. Although in many states, like Texas, say it should stay. Even though in the eyes of the government,
…show more content…
While only thirty-one, have the death penalty. The rise of states that are banning the death penalty are rapidly rising. This shows that more and more people are turning against the death penalty. Although there will be people who will always for the death penalty. Since 1976, including the last execution this year (April 7, 2016), there has been 1433 people has been executed (DPIC, Number of Executions by State and Region Since 1976)4. The year that has had the most executions was 1999, which that year had ninety-eight executions. Although states are turning against the use of the death penalty, however it will never be banned within the in the U.S. There are too many people, in this country, who believe that some crimes should be punishable by

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Eye for eye, tooth for tooth” is well represented in this case…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This view, held by generations of philosophers, is attractive because it satisfies our belief that people deserve to be punished if they have done something wrong and because it is a universal, traditional moral standard. The Equal Punishment Principle is probably the most attractive to philosophers because it appears to deliver a measurable way to develop punishments for law-breakers;…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Is Hammurabi Unfair

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An Eye for an Eye Did you know the famous saying “an eye for an eye” is actually 4,000 years old! Approximately 4 millennia ago, a great king known as Hammurabi conquered the land of Mesopotamia. He then established a very famous set of laws to run his newly-formed empire. However, these laws had extremely harsh and cruel punishments for many criminal acts, such as dismemberment and death.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will discuss how these two codes contributed to the laws of Western Civilization, what scripture says about law and justice and how these examples are evidence that or fall short of the Biblical standard. The Code of Hammurabi and the Twelve Tables were sets of laws established long ago in two different time periods and despite their differences they share a lot in common. The Code of Hammurabi and the Twelve Tables basically established the foundation for todays justice system and laws. They established how people should be protected from the powers of others, what was considered acceptable and not acceptable by laws and what would happen if these laws were broken. The Code of Hammurabi was more detailed while the Twelve…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hammurabi Era

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is well known worldwide and in our country of the United States of America that if a civilian commits an act of crime, there will be a consequence to pay. The type of crime that a civilian commit will determine the type of consequence the civilian will have to pay. Most of the consequences here in the United States are tolerable, either by being punished in prison, pay a fine, or the worst one being the death penalty. Now if we take it back to the Babylon King Hammurabi era, they perceived justice in a different way from todays laws and criminal procedures. A phrase mentioned in the code of Hammurabi states, “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed…”.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An eye for an eye; this is a type of retributive justice which considers punishment to be the best response to crime. This is an extreme example of how punishments use to be determined; it has helped set the stage for how retribution is established today. We use the principle “Let the punishment fit the crime”; facts and evidence are presented to aid a jury and judge in this decision making process. This is widely accepted concept, but the question that we have to stop and think about is, when does punishment go too far?…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi was a Babylonian king during 1792-1750 BC, also known as the creator of The code of Hammurabi. The code of Hammurabi consist of over 250 different laws and within these laws are rules and regulations on how the people in the Babylonian society should behave and act. An eye for an eye and tooth for tooth is a paraphrase of Hammurabi's code because of how extreme these laws are. Law 200 verifies that the reference an eye for an eye and tooth for tooth is in fact very accurate as the law states that if a man knocks out the teeth of his equal then his teeth shall be knocked out as well. This clearly shows that the man has every right to replay the action towards the other person without any consequences.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An Eye For An Eye Summary

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stephen Nathanson argues about how the philosophy of “An Eye for an Eye?” and how applying this to punish criminals is bad. While Igor Primoratz argues ways on justifying legal punishments”. Stephen Nathan states that “All it tells us is that the worst crimes ought to be met with the harshest punishment. But it says nothing about how harsh those punishment should be”(Shafer-Landau 380). Bythis quote he is staying that he knows that criminal should be punish for their actions however no one really makes emphasis on how far should the punishment go.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “An eye for an eye” is a vengeful statement. Taking this quote and applying it to one’s life would only perpetuate violence. It’s like throwing gasoline on a fire, which will only cause what is already bad, to get worse. That kind of manner will only fuel and feud. People should never mistake revenge for justice; Therefore, this statement would never be the answer.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The death penalty is the most severe form of current legal punishment. The question that is hotly debated is if this form of legal punishment is just and necessary. Hugo Bedau argues that capital punishment is not ethically acceptable. On the other hand, Ernest Van Den Haag argues that this penalty is completely necessary. This paper will summarize both opinions and give two reasons why the death penalty should be abolished, both from a ethical point of view and from a practical perspective.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eye For An Eye

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do you think an eye for an eye is a reasonable gesture for punishment? I have always believed that when you do something wrong it would come back on you, but do u think that is enough? In today's society the world evolves around crime and people are being punished by jail time. What if they were punished with the same crime they committed.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An Eye For An Eye

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An Eye for an Eye Is the idea of capital punishment, also called the death penalty, beneficial to modern society? The use of capital punishment for criminals and political opponents has been a standard practice by most societies throughout recorded history. By today’s standards, capital punishment is a wasteful use of time, resources, and most importantly human life that with time, patience, and understanding can return some of these individuals as stable and productive members of our society. As stated by The Death Penalty Information Center, when comparisons are made between death penalty states and non-death penalty states, the majority of death penalty states show murder rates higher than non-death penalty states. DNA stands for…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History Of Revenge Essay

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gun firing. Terrorist and enforcers exchanging shots. Bullets flying through the air. Blood splattered on the ground. Different people, men and women running out of the scene to save their lives.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As mentioned from the Old Testament, Matthew 5:38 “Eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth” becomes the basis of law. It is widely used even at the ancient times and it is also their way of getting justice. But they are not aware that this is also the root of why some people suffer and by just a click, one’s life will come to an end. Believing that this will end the criminality causes some countries to implement such law. On the other hand, lots if things must be given great focus for the success and effectiveness of it, which is too good to be done and is out of reach in our country.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays