When talking about mental health as opposed to physical health, there is an extensive discrepancy in the way that they are talked about, although both would have an impact on daily life. A person could suffer from both either since birth or they could be developed over time or after a specific incident. One specific stigma around mental disorders includes that society believes they show a sign of weakness, but there are many studies prove otherwise. Specific studies describe the way that the brain develops and how issues surrounding that growth could lead to certain mental disorders. This could be compared to an issue regarding a physical development in the body. For example, if the nerves or muscles in the heart develop incorrectly, it could
…show more content…
The brain activity shown in an individual who has a mental disorder like depression is exponentially different from an individual who does not suffer. Scientists and doctors describe the differences in the brain activity and the details regarding whether or not a specific region of the brain was performing at an elevated or reduced rate. The study implies a “failure to implement top-down processing by appropriate brain regions (left DLPFC, right IFG) due to increased activation in regions associated with responding to emotionally salient information (right DLPFC, amygdala)” (Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience). Health insurers have a difficult time deciphering what mental health disorders to cover and how extensive that coverage should be. Some average citizens who do not suffer from some mental illness may pose the argument that physical injuries are much easier to identify and diagnose. This information showing the brain’s activity with and without a mental disorder is an impeccable example of why health insurers should cover mental illnesses just as they would any coverage involving a physical …show more content…
This information means that there was an average of one or more mass shootings everyday in the United States. Further investigation has led to discoveries revolving around mental health issues and their connection to these horrific events. One very early case came from the 1966 shooting at the University of Texas by and ex-Marine. The gunman in this case killed his mother and wife before killing 14 more at the university from a 300 foot tower. Earlier that year, he told a psychiatrist that he was suffering from fits of anger due to his parents separation and specifically told his doctor his thoughts regarding his wanting to go to the tower with his rifle. Unfortunately, the doctor did not follow up on his alarming statements. After his rampage, officials discovered a note which stated that the gunman wished to have an autopsy performed on them searching for any mental disorders. The police autopsy showed that the shooter did have a brain tumor, but it was argued if it had any effect on the gunman’s behaviors (Charles Whitman Biography). In more recent years, the 2007 Virginia Tech case showed to be one of the deadliest shootings in the United States. A senior at the University killed thirty-two people before taking his own life. Two years prior to the incident, the gunman was ordered by a
The brain activity shown in an individual who has a mental disorder like depression is exponentially different from an individual who does not suffer. Scientists and doctors describe the differences in the brain activity and the details regarding whether or not a specific region of the brain was performing at an elevated or reduced rate. The study implies a “failure to implement top-down processing by appropriate brain regions (left DLPFC, right IFG) due to increased activation in regions associated with responding to emotionally salient information (right DLPFC, amygdala)” (Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience). Health insurers have a difficult time deciphering what mental health disorders to cover and how extensive that coverage should be. Some average citizens who do not suffer from some mental illness may pose the argument that physical injuries are much easier to identify and diagnose. This information showing the brain’s activity with and without a mental disorder is an impeccable example of why health insurers should cover mental illnesses just as they would any coverage involving a physical …show more content…
This information means that there was an average of one or more mass shootings everyday in the United States. Further investigation has led to discoveries revolving around mental health issues and their connection to these horrific events. One very early case came from the 1966 shooting at the University of Texas by and ex-Marine. The gunman in this case killed his mother and wife before killing 14 more at the university from a 300 foot tower. Earlier that year, he told a psychiatrist that he was suffering from fits of anger due to his parents separation and specifically told his doctor his thoughts regarding his wanting to go to the tower with his rifle. Unfortunately, the doctor did not follow up on his alarming statements. After his rampage, officials discovered a note which stated that the gunman wished to have an autopsy performed on them searching for any mental disorders. The police autopsy showed that the shooter did have a brain tumor, but it was argued if it had any effect on the gunman’s behaviors (Charles Whitman Biography). In more recent years, the 2007 Virginia Tech case showed to be one of the deadliest shootings in the United States. A senior at the University killed thirty-two people before taking his own life. Two years prior to the incident, the gunman was ordered by a