Explain Why Death Penalties Should Not Be Brought Back In The Uk

Decent Essays
In conclusion I think that death penalties should NOT be brought back into the UK because it sometimes takes the lives of the innocent people. Also because these death penalties cost a lost of money for all the equipment. Furthermore, there are other ways not just death penalties to determine crime. Finally it is also illegal to take someone elses life. The person who has committed the crime should get something less wounding done to them like life in prison or get them sent to a detention

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. What has been the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in Miranda v. Arizona on both law enforcement agencies and the court. -The arrested suspect must be told that they have the right to remain silent -The arrested suspect must be told that anything they say may be used against them in court -The arrested suspect must be told they have the right to an attorney with them before any questioning begins -They must be told that if they cannot afford an attorney an attorney can be provided for free -After they are told their rights and the arrested suspect says that they do not want an attorney and is willing to be questioned that they said so willingly and knowingly -The suspect has the right to turn off questioning any time after they have…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The research below is the discussion between two cases that involve the death penalty and the effects that the cases had toward the prison system. One case explains how the discussion of an armed robbery was taken to the supreme court and details information on how it is unconstitutional and violates our 8th and 14th amendment Gregg wanted to fight over how the death penalty was a cruel and unusual punishment to those who were sentenced to death. He managed to win the case which led to a hold on the death penalty. The second case explains how the death penalty is fair and constitutional towards those who have committed a crime involving murder. Furman also fought for this case explaining how those who have killed are basically acceptable to…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    nobody deserves to die for committing crime by mistake or without conscious, so the main point for human rights examinations must be that the death penalty is disproportionate with fundamental human rights standards. "Man must evolve for all human conflict a method which rejects revenge, aggression and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love."(Martin Luther King). Capital punishment may have impact in expanding violence mentalities in a society which might increase the quantity of crimes rate in countries that practiced it.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a human being the death penalty being enforced back into Australian society would mean a large number of death in our country and impact myself greatly. Personally thinking about the way it would make families learn to deal with the death of their loved ones, does not sound like one step closer to a brighter future. “The death toll rises” would not be a surprise for a newspaper headline anymore after death would be an option to deal with criminals. People would fear for the repercussions. These repercussions would include rioting if a man who was wrongfully convicted, was sentenced to death and families rampaging after a lost son or daughter, sister or brother.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should the Death Penalty Stay? Death is certainly the ultimate punishment. The death penalty needs to be implemented in our society because it is the most terminal punishment for the most horrific crimes. A few years back, i was coming home from school. It had been a great day, just as they normally had been that school year.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The participant’s response in graph 13 demonstrated that 31% strongly agreed/agreed, 20% neither agreed/disagreed, 49% strongly disagreed/disagreed that reinstating capital punishment in the UK will make it a safer place. In previous literature it is argued that the Deterrence theory has the aim to detain criminals to prevent social damage and furthermore, to have a punishment in place to” prevent individuals from breaking the law.” (Mackinnon. B, Fiala. A, 2015, P.215).…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate with the motion “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Diann Rust-Tierney argues that the death penalty is an insecure and hurtful policy that does not help advance public safety. Diann claims that the death penalty is not giving the public any safety nor does it decrease violence. Arguing that it is a waste of taxpayer money that could be used to improve law enforcement training. She later argues that the death penalty is an outdated system that is bias towards race and color, claiming that black men are less likely to be sentenced to death even though they are most likely to be victims of homicide. Diann ends her argument with a humanitarian statement that we as humans have the ability to change our way of life and we should not have to take…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished When people think about inhumaneness, do they think of the death penalty? Killing a human just like a dog being put down. The United States government is doing just that. The government has sentenced many more people to death row and they are facing an unjust punishment.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Within the United States of America, the death penalty is a continued controversy practice. The United States practices capital punishment on a state level; there are thirty-two states with the death penalty. Therefore, despite the ongoing battle to abolish the death penalty, majority of states comprehend the sentence as a necessary punishment to certain crimes committed within each state. In Texas a person can be sentenced to death row even if the criminal is not responsible for the actual murder while in Alabama that same criminal may not be punished to the degree of death.…

    • 3946 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a few topics that when people are asked their stance on them, their responses can be quite passionate and can stir up a debate amongst a group of individuals. The death penalty is often a touchy subject and has sparked conversations and debates in the past regarding the justness and constitutionality of this particular policy within the criminal justice system. I chose to research and write about this particular policy because it is one that, in my opinion, holds the largest impact and can inflict the greatest damage to society. Whether people are for it or against it, it is a discussion that needs to be continued because the public needs to know the consequences and the impact this policy carries when it comes to intersections such…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We are tormented about the wrong things such as death penalty, we are using unnecessary money and killing innocence people. By the way, death penalty cost more than life in prison. Being said, cases without death penalty is averaged around $740,000, while cases with death penalty is averaged around $1.26 million.(Gentile 2014) In fact in my eyes, there is a better way to help families of murder victims. In addition some who are innocence are having too serve in death row.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Britain influenced the colonies more than any other country and has a long history of punishment by death. About 450 BC, the death penalty was often enforced by throwing the condemned into a quagmire. By the 10th Century, hanging from gallows was the most frequent execution method. William the Conqueror opposed taking life except in war, and ordered no person to be hanged or executed for any offense. However, he allowed criminals to be mutilated for their crimes.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s society the death penalty is viewed as an immoral thing that a human can do too another human while playing God. In the State of Florida, the Supreme Court has ruled out the death penalty too minors and offered them a life sentence or early release on parole. They believe that it is unjust for a person too be in prison as a minor and receive the death penalty that is a long process in the United States. As an average person being Christian or not you would see the death penalty as a way of moral wrong since God is the only one that may choose when you live or die. Therefore, the United States government makes sure that the accused murder suspect is thoroughly the criminal before the State can formerly execute a person.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays