Explain What Kind Of Damages Is He Entitled To?

Decent Essays
Questions:

1) What kind of damages is he entitled to?

There are three kinds of categories of damages that may be available in this fact pattern:

General damages: which refer to the individual's cost of suffering; cannot put an exact price

- loss of enjoyment of life

-physical and mental pain and suffering

-loss of future earning capaicty

Special damages: which refer to the expenses caused by the negligence,for example medical bills, work that was missed, future loss of wages, earnings and future medical bills, and or therapies etc.

Punitive damages: which refer to the actual knowledge that the doctor was aware that he / she was behaving in a harmful manner. This type of damages is typically determined by a judge or jury as

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Current state of wrongful dismissal in Employment Law and why we believe it needs to be changed. The current state of wrongful dismissal is that damages are awarded based on what notice of lieu an employer/employee receives (Richard A. Yates, 2011). Weakness for employee: • Not compensated for pain and suffering, only awarded difference of notice they should have received and benefits/pension they would have received (Richard A. Yates, 2011).…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But the hospital argued that Dr. Graybeal wasn’t their employee. And they weren’t in control of what done by Dr.Graybeal. To be an employee or servant of the hospital, the hospital must be in charge of the work their employee has done. Therefore, the doctor’s negligent wasn’t their responsibility. Whereas, plaintiff argued, when they were in the ER room, and the attending physician took care of them, no matter who was in charge of the authorities, the hospital should be liable since it was underdetermined and mistreated by one of its…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exact Time Limit to Bring Medial Misconduct Case in Court In accordance with Illinois medical negligence law, the claimant has up to two years from the moment the he became familiar or should have become familiar of the injury to start a court case according to the Act of limitations. Additionally, under not any circumstances does Illinois health care misconduct law let a patient to start a court case more than four years later than the health care misconduct occurred as a result of the statute of repose. Illinois also has a unique Act of limitations for claimants who have small age at the moment the medical misconduct took place. Anybody aging less than 18 years has up to eight years as time limit to file a court case, on condition that the legal proceedings are started prior to the claimant becomes 22 years old.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eeoc Case Study

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Protected Activity- Filing a formal complaint of discrimination or harassment with EEOC is a protected activity. Rebuttable Presumption: facts, that are accepted by a court until it is proved to the untrue. Relief Sought- Plaintiff must identify the damages or other relief sought in their complaint or pleading.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Crocker V. Roethling

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In a medical negligence cases, the plaintiff needs to prove that “the care of the health care provider was not in accord with the standards of practice amongst members of the same health care profession with related training and experience in similar communities at the time of the purported act giving rise to the cause of action. One of the vital elements of a claim in medical negligence is that the defendant did breach the applicable standards of medical care owed to the plaintiff. The Plaintiffs must establish the appropriate standard of care through expert testimony as seen in the case of Crocker v. Roethling, 363 N.C. 140…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper will discuss liability and negligence in the healthcare field as well as negligence issue in the healthcare field. Liability is defined as a potential for a lawsuit (Dunn 114). Liability can be found just about anywhere and is a concerning area in today’s age. Healthcare workers are very familiar to this word and been familiarized throughout their careers with this word. I can’t be a scary thing to think about in this field the potential to be sued from an employee level all the way to a corporate level.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical Malpractice Theory

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Literature Review: Theory The literature review is vital to the success of this paper as it will look at the past relevant theories and studies to help define important terms while theory in this paper will serve to help define medical malpractice. The first step is to determine when a doctor is liable to their patient, and the courts can use the entry rules (Stein, 2012) to help determine when a doctor is liable to their patients. Also entry rules also help determine when medical malpractice occurs (Stein, 2012), but the theory also acknowledges when these medical malpractices should be exempt with the creation of the exit rules (Stein, 2012). Ideally according to Stein's theory, medical institutions should govern entry rules as they…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This type of adjudication normally occurs when the case is dealing with questions of the law. Under high reliance on laypeople, the jury is the ultimate decision maker of the case and judge is the one that decides the degree of punishment that…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Definitions 1. Plain view is a legal term that describes the ready visibility of objects that might be seized as evidence during a search by police in the absence of a search warrant specifying the seizure of those objects. To lawfully seize evidence in plain view, officers must have a legal right to be in the viewing area and must have cause to believe that the evidence is somehow associated with criminal activity pg. 205 2. Terry Stop is a brief detention of a person by police on reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activity but short of probable cause to arrest.…

    • 1518 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Neither patient was informed by the doctor that he was independent contractor nor he had any kind of identity on him that he was affiliated within independent anesthesiology group. During the surgery patient suffered brain damage, which led her to death. As plaintiff was not able to prove that physicians were independent contractor and was not working for the hospital. Patient was misled that he was one of the hospital…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Negligence Tort Case Study

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence occurs when a particular person fails to perform a duty that they are entitled to perform. According to laws.com, there are four things that must occur in or-der for a tort to be a negligence tort, “a person must owe a duty or service to the victim in question; the individual who owes the duty must violate the promise or obligation; an injury then must arise because of that specific violation; and the injury causes must have been reasonably foreseeable as a result of the person’s negligent actions. (laws.com)” The decision in the case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of University of California, demonstrates these four qualifying factors, therefore making it a negligence tort case.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Law Research Paper

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper gives a short introduction of tort law and mainly focus on the standard of care, how the courts determining what is the ‘reasonable person’ and whether there are some exceptions to the courts. The law of tort is the law of civil liability for wrongfully injury which provides remedies to individuals harmed by the wrongful conduct of others in order to protect an individual’s private rights. There are two major categories of torts: intentional tort and negligent tort. The general principle of negligence is concerned with compensating people who have injured or damaged and thus a defendant will be negligent if he or she falling below the standard of the ordinary reasonable man in the same situation. A person will be liable for their…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays