Explain The Utilitarian Justification For Punishment

Improved Essays
The utilitarian justification for punishment would not only violate individual rights, it might also distort the relations between punishment and wrongful conduct. In our society, wrongful conducts are only wrong because we have rules to restrict our actions, and when these rules are broken punishment will be inflicted, therefore we understand breaking the rules are wrong. According to the utilitarian theory, punishment is only justified when social utility exist while inflicting punishment. Therefore, if a punishment somehow achieves zero social utility, such as it cannot reform the wrongdoer, nor can it protect or deter the rest of the society or do any other goods, then punishment will not be necessary even if the wrongdoer broke the law.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the most recent couple of years the verbal confrontation about whether obligatory sentencing ought to be nullified, and judges utilizing their own carefulness ought to happen has turned into a well known dialog in the United States. I see upsides and downsides for both sides. Mandatory least have filled the correctional facilites and penitentiaries with an excess of peaceful, first time guilty parties which brings about prison/jail packing and more obligation. President Obama expressed in a discourse "We have to lower long obligatory least sentences or dispose of them totally. " Opponents of compulsory least sentences contend that: Minority litigants are excessively detained contrasted with Caucasian respondents under the compulsory least…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury may also exercise the sentencing guidelines are usually imposed by the judge in most cases, but sentencing or it can be mandated by a statue; such as, mandatory prison sentence for certain crimes. There are various forms of sentences that are to be reviewed: concurrent and consecutive sentences, good time, sentencing sanctions, sentencing models, indeterminate sentences, determine sentences, structured sentences, feral sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentences, and that of the three-strikes laws. The issue with concurrent and consecutive sentences is that concurrent sentences allow for than one sentence to be served at the same time as the others, while consecutive sentences only allow for one sentence to be served at a time, this is good in the case that there…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    An escape from the tyranny of an oppressive king was the cornerstone of the the founding fathers drafting of the Constitution. All men are created equal and in turn should be afforded equal justice. However, legislation from both the federal and state governments could threaten that very premise. Three strikes sentencing laws seek to break a cycle of recidivism from career criminals, but ensnare minorities and the poor at a disproportionate rate when compared to those not in need and whites in the United States. In order to understand the how these laws affect minorities and the poor it is important to first understand the history behind why governments pass such harsh sentencing laws.…

    • 1674 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An example would be if someone robs a bank and shot fires at people without killing anyone. In a utilitarian mind -set we should kill this person who didn’t kill anyone.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism simply states that society should find what creates the most utility and apply that action. Philosophy is not performed in a vacuum and every crime has different circumstances that can lead to a different punishment which creates the most utility. Every consequence must be weighed if a certain punishment is applied and every case is unique. A utilitarian decision can be based upon past precedents and experiences, as done in the United States legal system. For example, society would not benefit from the execution of a mentally impaired man that was the cause for another’s…

    • 2649 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Among the three ethical theories studied in class, the utilitarian theory can be used in explaining ethical implications of Face Recognition technology. Chonko, Larry (1-5) describes various ethical theories. However, Chonko Larry (2) asserts that utilitarian ethical theory is based on the ability of an individual to predict the significance of an action. Action in this case study is using Facial Recognition technology in iPhone X. According to the theory, an option which results in the greatest benefit to most individuals is the one who is ethically right and correct.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As many of you already know the United States has the highest percentage of its population behind bars compared to any other country. This may be related to the fact that a majority of petty crimes require mandatory sentencing. Politicians such as District Attorney Dan Conley believe that mandatory sentencing is an efficient way to protect the population from corrupt individuals as well as decreasing crime rates. However, housing all of these individuals is not cheap, the funding for this endeavor is taken directly from the taxes all of us have to pay. While I agree that petty crime offenders should compensate in some way for their crimes, further destroying their lives is not the answer.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America today, crimes are happening every second of every day. From possession of drugs, burglary, grand theft auto, to murder. I 'm going to be discussing how an offender is sentenced after committing a crime. Also what all the different types of sentences the United States has. Then I will go through the major philosophies of sentencing and some differences and similarities they have between each other.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the semester, we have repeatedly discussed statistics regarding current crime and incarceration rates. In comparison to previous rates, from earlier decades, it is clear that society’s viewpoint on crime has changed significantly. Beginning in the early 1970s, the United States initiated a more punitive criminal justice system (1). In The Punishment Imperative, authors Todd R. Clear and Natasha A. Frost created a concept for the reasoning behind this mass incarceration. Referred to as the “Punishment Imperative,” its basis for reasoning focused on the symbolic image that crime held in society; meaning, as crime rates grew, the societal fear for basic safety began to emerge.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment or simply the death penalty, is usually the harshest sentence reserved for those who have committed such reprehensible acts that they warrant death. In justifying punishment, there has been significant discourse regarding a retributive point of view and a consequentialist one. Retributivists, such as Immanuel Kant, posit that punishing those who have done wrong is justifiable because we are merely giving them what they deserve in return for what they have done. On the other hand, consequentialists assert that punishment is justifiable as it brings about positive consequences such as crime deterrence, rehabilitation, and social protection. In this paper, we will primarily examine the Kantian approach to capital punishment as well as its objections, followed by the consequentialist view as a secondary response in formulating a more comprehensive view of its justification.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Kent Greenwalt (1983), both retributive, as well as the utilitarian perspective in relation to justification of societal punishments were prevailing methodologies. First, the main justifications for punishment using the retributive perspective were that punishment was in place due to the offender deserving to be punished for a specific wrongdoing. Greenwalt states that there is a simple justification for using this perspective, if there is an offender who has violated the law that others have to follow, then the offender is worthy of punishment to reestablish the moral order that has been damaged by the committing of a crime. In this particular perspective, there is a justification in place that the community, society, etc.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Correctional Ideology

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “The correctional ideology refers to a body of ideas and practices that pertain to the processing of offenders, as determined by law.” There are three main correctional ideologies: punishment, rehabilitation, and prevention. Throughout history, these have been the methods used to deal with offenders. The make-up of these ideologies connects to the public’s opinion of the criminals. Whether society has chosen an “eye for an eye,” a more humane standard, or a hope to prevent crime, these ideologies have no doubt changed throughout time to accommodate the public’s needs.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All throughout the country, there has been a controversial discussion on the subject of how prisons should be used. People are arguing if prisons should be used for punishment or should prisons be utilized to rehabilitate the inmates? There are many people that think that punishment is the best answer because these criminals need to be taught a lesson for what they have done; although I would argue that this is not completely true. When criminals are punished it only makes them more hostile and anxious, which does not lead to any improvements for these inmates (Day).…

    • 1835 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism’s goal is to promote goodness and happiness and focuses on how no individual’s happiness is more valuable than that of any other. Unfortunately, not everyone has the same definition of goodness. This is the key flaw in utilitarianism because like in the example of man trapped in the electrical hub, it can be skewed by number of people it may affect. Another flaw in utilitarianism is that it does not take into account justice or laws of any kind. If the government attempted to use utilitarianism to justify it’s laws, even if they are trivial like jaywalking, there can be an extensive argument on both sides of the issue and no decision could ever be made.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays