Explain The Three Major Components For A Criminal Act To Be Punishable Mens Rea

Decent Essays
There are three major components for a criminal act to be punishable. First it must have a harmful effect on society, contain criminal intent (men’s rea), and actus rea.
First, to determine when a criminal act can be punishable one must distinguish between mala in se and mala prohibita. Mala in se is dangerous act such as rape or murder, and mala prohibita are acts that are deemed illegal by statutory law. A society expects to be protected and safe in their nation, and when a crime is committed we seek the justice system in hopes of punishment. Next, for a crime to be punishable men’s rea must be present. Mens rea is the criminal intent of a crime meaning that the criminal is aware that they are violating the law. Lastly, actus rea is the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This requirement if fundamental in criminal law. After reading into the mens rea requirement, the Court interpreted that it “requires a court to read into a statute only that mens rea which is necessary to separate wrongful conduct from ‘otherwise innocent conduct.’” Elonis also presents an argument that without the subjective intent to threaten requirement, 875(c) criminalizes negligent speech, which would violate the First Amendment and be unconstitutional. In a previous case, Watts v. United States, the Court mad an exception to the rule for “true threats” of physical harm. Elonis emphasized that it is a limited exception, differing to most First Amendment cases.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Q.1. 1 [250 words] Name three major problems with the concept of crime as criminal behaviour. “Criminal behaviour is defined by the laws of particular jurisdictions, and there are sometimes vast differences between and even within countries regarding what types of behaviour are prohibited”. (Edge, 2016). One of the key problems is that throughout the world many countries consider some criminal acts to be more serious than others for example marijuana is an illegal drug in Ireland but is legal in Alaska.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mala in se and mala prohibita are two different terms that defines crimes in different perspectives. Mala in se is a crime that it is committed as an evil act; our society views this crime as morally wrong. Depending how serious the crime is, it can go from a felony to even the death penalty. For example, someone that commits a murder can be drawn into this category. A murder is morally wrong.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crime is an action that is undertaken that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by state and punishable by law. Punishment is when a crime is committed the consequence that the person should suffer. If a person was to commit a crime there should always be some type of punishment. Depending on the type of crime committed should determine the penalty that should be enforced. At any given time there shouldn’t be any sympathy showed to the committer because it was all premediated before it actually occurred.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The degree of interaction the criminal has with her unlawful object should hold a great deal of weight when deciding how to administer repercussions. No attempt should merit the full weight of a completed crime’s sentence, but the severity of the penalty should increase in harmony with the amount of effort the expectant violator expends. The attempt should not merit full offense because the full extent of damage has not been incurred and the possibility that one might not complete the full amount of damage if given the chance should be considered. As Joel Feinberg has mentioned in the article “The Classical Debate” the austerity of the punishment must be in line with the severity of the crime else it undermines the system of deterrents (800).…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In our current criminal justice system, it has become modernized and different types of punishment are imposed on different offences. Historical types of punishment still exist in some cases today in other parts of the world. Legal challenges have been one of the contributing factors for the reason why the system has been modernized of the criminal justice system. Our society has taken crime as one of the most serious problems. There are continuous debates as to if the punishment fits the crime, but alternative policies are used when dealing with crimes which are not as harsh as historical…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Retributivism wishes to bring the victim and the wrongdoer to a mutual ground. A ground in which they are equal and where one is not above the other. However, Golash argues that retributivism fails to achieve Through punishment. Golash argues that “punishment, on the other hand, appears to assert that the offender is of a lower value than the victim (just as crime asserts that the victim is of lower value than the offender)” (150). Furthermore, Golash rebukes punishment ion retributivism since it fails to amend the wrong.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the following paper you will see the correlations between the three major components of the Canadian criminal justice system. First we must examine each of the components of the criminal justice system alone before we get to understand how they overlap together. First of all, there is the police, the courts and the corrections. The police are the law enforcers and maintainers of order throughout Canada. There are three levels of policing in Canada; municipal, provincial and federal, there are some circumstances that they work together to accomplish a common goal.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When looking at the difference between general intent crimes and specific intent crimes a person has to look at the intent that is held within the criminal activity at the time that it took place (Brody and Aker, 2010). The intent of criminal activity can be found by evaluating the mens rea that is imbedded into the criminal active itself. The meaning of mens rea is that when a person commits an act that could be a criminal office in nature, there must be an evaluation of the person mental state, a reason to commit the crime, and the harm that was meant to take place after the event (Brody and Aker, 2010). To evaluate the differences between these two legal terms, I will start with the specific intent in criminal activity.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When a crime has been committed the criminal justice system asks three questions: what law was broken, who did it and what punishment do they deserve…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice system can seem convoluted for the average citizen who has never been around the law enforcement community. The three agencies that make up the criminal justice system is the Police, Courts, and the Corrections. In the paragraphs below, I will briefly describe these three steps of the criminal justice center. Police departments and Sheriff’s Offices across the country is the first step of the criminal justice system. Whether it is at the local, state, or federal level, the law enforcement officer plays a major role in the successful prosecution of a defendant.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman law was being revived and grafted onto the English Law that formed the notion of mental elements in crime (Chesney, 1939). Another great influence according to Chesney, was as early as the Sermon on the Mount where Christ laid the philosophy out that supported the proposition where desire, wish, and intent determine culpability (Chesney, 1939). Augustine and Theodore of Tarsus were the two main English entities that helped with the acceptance of the doctrine of mens rea in criminal law in (Chesney, 1939). The term mens rea itself, comes from the writings of Edward Coke. Coke was an English jurist who wrote about common law practices.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mens Rea Definition

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term actus reus simply refers to the fact that a defendant effectually committed the crime as accused (Edersheim, Brendel, & Price, 2012). Mens rea, on the other hand, is defined as “a principle of criminal…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Sentencing Essay

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The criminal justice system maintains different goals when attempting to correct deviant and illicit behavior. In accordance to the sentencing guidelines established by United States Sentencing Commission (2011), punitive sentences are to incorporate a purpose for the sentence. Criminal sentencing can be categorized into six areas with distinctive goals: general and specific deterrence, incapacitation, retributive, rehabilitative, and equity/restitution. The sentencing goals are not exclusive and at times overlap in achieving its purpose. Furthermore, one goal is not better than another, but rather one would be more applicable in certain situations than another.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mens Rea Analysis

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mens rea, a person's understanding that his or her conduct is criminal, is the mental element. On the other hand, actus reus, the actual act, is the physical undertaking. Differences Between Tort Law and Criminal law In tort law, the concept of an ‘attempted tort’ does not exist, nor do legal proceedings occur for near misses in accident cases.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays