Expert Testimony Admissibility Standards

Out of the three sets of expert testimony admissibility standards: The Frye Standard, Rule 702, and the Daubert Standard, the last standard is the best option for Florida. Three main reasons why the Daubert Standard is the better option is: 1) It increases the reliability of evidence by examining factors such as error rate, alternative explanations, and peer reviews 2) It has more checks and balances than the Frye Standard’s criteria of just general acceptance. 3) It is more likely to filter out shaky evidence because of the increased strictness of the evidence criteria.
The first reason the Daubert Standard would be the best option for Florida rather than the Frye Standard or Rule 702 would be because of the comparative reliability it affords