Prohibition Of Slavery Essay

Improved Essays
In the early nineteenth century the United States started to expand. Many areas in the expansion wanted to become territories to later become states. Arkansas was no different. As part of the Missouri territory, Arkansas wanted to break off and become its own territory. Being in the southern part of the United States, Arkansas was great for agriculture and slavery. Slavery and its legality in the United States was an issue that started when the country was being formed. It became an even larger issue as the country expanded westward. Many in Congress felt, however, that slavery should not expand and worked to prohibit slavery in the new territories. Others in Congress felt differently and saw the prohibition of slavery as an attack on the …show more content…
Representative Taylor of New York, tirelessly tried to prohibit slavery in the Arkansas territory. Representative Taylor understood that he could not get rid of slavery in the United States, but did not want to see it spread. He felt that the roots of slavery were too deep from Georgia to Mississippi to pull up, but felt that new roots should not be planted. Representative Taylor argued that slavery should stay east of the Mississippi River. Taylor made the point that if slavery was prohibited in the Arkansas territory that slavery would disappear from the territory. It would become a problem though when a farmer wanted to move to the territory with his slaves. He would be bringing is property illegally across territory and states lines. Representative Walker of North Carolina saw this as attack on slavery and the southern lively …show more content…
The motion to prohibit slavery in Arkansas failed to pass. Arkansas could allow slavery. The next issue the House dealt with was the amendment that said children who were born as slaves could be held to service until age twenty-five, when they became free citizens. Seventy-five yeas and seventy-three nay, in favor of the amendment. Representative Walker voted positively so he could send the bill back to reconsideration. When the bill went back into reconsideration by the committee it was under the order that bill come back without the clause. Eighty-nine yeas and eighty-seven nays, sent the bill back to committee to be rewritten with out a restriction on slavery. Any slave born in the territory would remain a slave. The Arkansas territory could practice slavery. Arkansas came extremely close to becoming a territory that prohibited slavery. During the nineteenth century in the South could have been an astounding order by the federal government. As Arkansas became its own territory, started to become the state of Arkansas. The debate of prohibition of slavery in Arkansas, illustrated the divide on slavery that ultimately led to the Civil

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    There were many causes and triggers that caused the American civil war but the civil war started because of the differences on between the Free states and the slave’s states over the national government to ban slavery in territories that had not become states yet. Abraham Lincoln who was elected in 1860 promised to keep slavery out of those territories. The seven slave states at the time (Southern California, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, Tennessee). These states seceded and formed a new nation that was pro-slavery called The Confederate States of…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Expansion Of Slavery

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The question of whether the south would be able to have one of the states as a slave state arose, and caused a lot of tension. The northerners said that the lands of Kansas or Nebraska would not be healthy enough to sustain a plantation. While the southerners, said that expanding slavery would help the economy and the social tensions. During this time period in the south, a lot of slave insurrections took place. As a result, plantation owners began to think spreading the slaves out would decrease the rebellious atmosphere.…

    • 1762 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery was a big part of the United States. The North and the South made a compromise, which lead to the Missouri Compromise in 1820. The Missouri Compromise banned slavery in the western territories. The South saw this as a threat to slavery. They did not think slaves had right, so if a slave was to escape to a free state they would still be the property of their owners and if they were found they had to be returned to their rightful owner.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With an antislavery mindset, many opposed Lincoln especially the South. Lincoln came into his presidential term with the conflict over slavery already put into motion. This created a greater urgency to establish a common ground on the issue. He had to juggle the North and appease the South so he didn 't plunge the whole nation into war. He understood this concept so his idea was simply to appease the South.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic I chose to analyze from the book Taking Sides is rather the Civil War fought over slavery. This issue occurred in the 18th century and impacted black slaves and whites across the United States. Prior to the Civil War in the southern states (which declared themselves as the Confederate states when they separated from the United States) there were lands that included laborious work and the slaves would do the labor from sunup to sundown. The Confederate states desired to have more slave states and they declared secession from the United States. The Union noticed the Confederate states as a threat and a group of rebels who wanted more power but, the Union wanted balance and would continue to have power.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On The Secession

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mississippi understood slavery to be the world’s greatest material interest and most vital part of commerce. So to fight against slavery is to fight against commerce and civilization. Mississippi felt the hostility toward slavery before the Constitution was even drawn up. From there the hostility only increased up till 1819-20 when the South was deprived of more than half of the territory purchased from France. Then again when Texas was annexed and more territory was won from Mexico.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South wanted to secede from the Union because they believed that states had the right to decide whether or not slavery would be legal in their state (American Civil War). These state rights were the most significant rights that caused the Civil War. The North and South also had very different economies because of the types…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Southern states believed that Lincoln was against slavery and they also thought that he would favor with the Northern states. Cardoza and Hume state that Lincoln was trying to contain slavery only in the states that were slave states but he knew that the whole nation had to be for slavery completely or against slavery completely (197). Before Lincoln was even president the first state to secede was South Carolina possibly because it was one of the states that participated the most in slavery (198). After South Carolina seceded Mississippi, Florida, Texas, Alabama, Georgia, and Louisiana followed. All of these causes led to the start of the Civil War specifically trying to stop slavery from expanding to the new lands of the United States, as well as being able to keep America…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ordinance Of Nullification

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages

    At that time, it was decided that the slavery issue in the two new territories (Kansas and Nebraska) would be left to the principle of popular sovereignty (Catton 29). It was soon learned that the issue could not be so simply resolved, and violent fights broke out between pro-slavery and pro-abolition factions in the territories. In 1857, the Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott case added more fuel to the fire. Even though Scott, a negro slave, had spent many years living in a free state, the Supreme Court declared that he was still the “property” of his owner. Many northerners objected to this decision not only because of its unfairness but also because it would open the way for slavery to be expanded to other states - since nothing could be done to prevent a slave-owner from taking his “property” to any state that he wanted to.…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This war mainly occurred due to the fact that the South wanted to spread slavery across the United States and the North wanted to keep the separation. It is important to mention these controversial movements and failed compromises, because they are the ultimate reasons that the North and the South disputed over the gradual spread of slavery. Plantation expansion was the main reason that slavery thrived, and due to the increasing need for income, the South tried to spread slavery to the North. Since it became obvious that the North was not going to give in, when Abraham Lincoln released the Emancipation Proclamation it sent the South into an uproar of…

    • 2436 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays