Exemplification Essay: Antonin Scalia Supreme Court Justice

Antonin Scalia was a Supreme Court Justice who was appointed by President Ronald Reagan. He was a well-rounded judge who stood for the Constitution, and the way the founders intended the constitution to be conceived. He was a conservative judge who stood his ground for what he believed was the correct thing to do. Leaning to the conservative side, Scalia made a decision to uphold the constitution. He believed the constitution was not to make change easier but delay or prevent change. Scalia voted against the Affordable care act, then voted for same sex marriage the next day because he believe the constitution stood for the right to marry and be happy with anyone you would like. He believed the place for activating change was in the legislature where people are be represented and it is …show more content…
The Supreme Court has veered on the republican side for some time now. The Democrats viewed Scalia’s death as being a way to flip the Supreme Court’s majority. Like the Supreme Court, the senate is mostly republican. There is a good chance Gorsuch would become the next Judge if the Senate just had a simple vote. If Scalia was replaced by a democrat, it would shift the balance to 5 democrats with only 4 republicans. The democrats were so desperately wanting this to happen they voted on a filibuster to try to wait out the nomination so there would be no vote at all. Filibusters are a tactic that is used to basically wait until a bill is dead. There is a maximum time that a bill or subject in the senate can be talked about. After this maximum allowed time, the bill is dead. Filibusters are so deadly to subjects in these situations because the filibuster can go on as long as there is someone actively speaking. This raised many alarms in the Republican Party, if a filibuster got started there would be no way to stop it. This would most likely mean Gorsuch would not obtain the position at