Exclusionary Rule Essay

Improved Essays
The Supreme Court adopted the exclusionary rule as a way of prohibiting the use of evidence in a court of law in situations where government officials directly or indirectly violate an individual’s constitutional rights to obtain evidence to secure a conviction. In other words, the exclusionary rule is a means of protecting the constitutional rights of the people from authoritative misconduct in violation of the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments against unreasonable search and seizure, coercion, and provides the right to counsel under due process of the law (Cornell Law School, 2007).
The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine can result in the dismissal of evidence collected at a crime scene as proof of guilt found in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that the rights of the people are to be secure in their homes and person, papers and effects, and shall not be violated by unreasonable search and seizure, and no warrants shall be issued unless it is supported by probable
…show more content…
A warrantless entry and search for a suspect and to help victims in emergency circumstances is also permitted. Officers can secure evidence in emergency situations if the officers have reasonable belief the evidence will be destroyed in circumstances when there is no time to secure a warrant from a judge or magistrate. Plain view and consent given by the legal owner is also a cause for warrantless search and seizure procedures. Although the burden of proof to afford a warrantless search and seizure must be proven, given the totality of the circumstances involved (Brooks,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This paper argues that the Fourth Amendment effects law enforcement. In criminal cases, it is important that there is substantial evidence to reach a verdict. For the prosecution to obtain such evidence, they must perform a search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable and unlawful search and seizures. It states that people have the right to secure their person and property from search and seizure without a warrant.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment is meant to protect the citizen from unreasonable seizures and searches without a warrant. This includes having their homes, persons, and items in their homes searched by police as well as other officials. Following the Amendment, if a police officer suspects that a citizen has is perpetrating or is taking part in a crime, the office has first to obtain a warrant legally.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is drug testing of students who participate in extracurricular activities permitted under the fourth amendment? fourth amendment states that a person has the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Meaning that the people are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government while it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures, only those the law deems unreasonable. Which is determined by the balance of two important interests being…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In chapter six, the author examines searches for evidence. The fourth amendment commands the use of warrants. As previously stated, warrants usually consist of three elements to meet the fourth amendment standard. I believe the knock and announce rule is truly effective procedure because this standard can protect officers from injury and more than likely preserve physical evidence from being destroyed. This is also a valuable tool in preventing a high risk target from escaping the scene.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People V. Ulysis Parriss

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    .When it comes to getting arrested the police can do it two ways, they can do it with a warrant or without one. However both must have probable cause. The fourth amendment is what protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. The two important thing with this amendment is the requirements of probable cause to get a warrant and it how it prohibits unreasonable search and seizures.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”( Interests Protected law.cornell.edu). Probable cause is if there something that's easily to tell that something's wrong or not right. Like if it's a murder scene or they can smell drugs or smell alcohol in the car. But very many cases are being dismissed because of the failure of the use of a search warrant. Even though that really isn’t a good thing it assures you because of the fourth amendment you can't go to prison because it’s a cop's word against a civilians.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States v. Leon case, the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should not be applied so as to bar the use in the prosecution's case in chief of evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to be invalid. Pp. 905-925. (United States v. Leon, (1984) No. 82- 1771.)…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Probable Cause Case

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In reference to the Constitution of the United States of America, the Fourth Amendment is set to protect the American citizen from unlawful searches and seizures (Samaha, 223). According to this statement and how such relates to the presence of Law Enforcement in our daily lives; officers must have probable cause if they intend to investigate an individual for a particular reason. Probable Cause states that the particular officer(s), must have factual evidence that a crime is being or is about to be committed before he or she investigates a person (Samaha, 225). With the numerous incidents that have involved Law Enforcement officers performing unlawful searches, and utilizing things such as excessive force to subdue a suspect, the trust of the community in these government officials has been on the decline. Luckily perhaps, the…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Da Vs Harris Case Study

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Police officers did not have the right to approach the porch of Jardines’ house to find evidence, this is know as exclusionary rule,improperly gathered evidence may not be introduce in a criminal…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Case Brief Of Us Vs Leon

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment should have been modified to permit the introduction of the evidence that was obtained in the reasonable good-faith belief that search and seizure was in accord with the Fourth Amendment. (White, Justice) Yes, The exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment should have been modified to permit the introduction of evidence that was seized in the reasonable good-faith belief that the search and seizure were in accord with the Fourth Amendment. The officer’s reliance for the warrant must have been objectively reasonable.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of Jardines v. Florida, the Exclusionary rule protected Jardines on a technicality ("Fourth Amendment--Trespass Test--Florida v. Jardines," 2013). Jardines was able to prove that Miami-Dade Police and DEA illegally used a sniff-test to determine if marijuana was in his home ("Fourth Amendment -- Trespass Test -- Florida v. Jardines," 2013). Moreover, the judges believed that had Miami-Dade Police and DEA served a warrant and notified Jardines he was being investigated the case could have ended differently ("Fourth Amendment--Trespass Test--Florida v. Jardines," 2013). Conclusively, depending on the severity of the case it determines whether the Amendment rights were violated (Soree,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Exclusionary Rule

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the most controversial, and perhaps,most important American legal principle, is the exclusionary clause which under Constitutional law, holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of defendants constitutional rights is not permitted for use in criminal persecutions. Sparked by the famous case Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule has a fair share of critics who argue that police blunders let criminals go free. In the 1961 Supreme Court case, Dollree Mapp was convicted when police searched her house ,under a false warrant, for a suspected bomb fugitive and found “lewd, lavicious, or obscene material”, otherwise known as pornography. Mapp claimed the police had no probable cause to search for the obscene materials found; the Court let her go because the material had been seized without a warrant. Despite the occasional occurrence of criminals going free, the exclusionary rule is vital to democracy because the principle ensures liberty and justice in America for all.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is common for a search to be defined as any action by government officials, which involves seeking for indication of a violation of law. Nonetheless, according to the Court’s cases, a search ensues when there is a physical invasion into one of the “constitutionally protected areas” which can be associated with the Fourth Amendment: persons, papers and effects (Whitebread and Slobogin, 120). Silverman vs United States (1961) exemplify how searches have conditions. Evidence officers gathered by…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before this amendment the amendments above only applied at the federal level. The Fourteenth Amendment includes the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule means that evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution cannot be used in a criminal trial to prove guilt. Crime control and due process models are key models in sculpting the criminal justice policy.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays