Exclusionary Rule Case Study

Improved Essays
Over 50 years ago, the exclusionary rule was introduced in the United States by the U.S. Supreme Court, and had contributed to many criminal court cases (“The fourth amendment,” n.d.). There are two important criminal cases that played a role in making the exclusionary rule possible, including Weeks v. United States and Mapp v. Ohio (1961) (“The fourth amendment,” n.d.). In the Weeks case, the defendant claimed the decision of a guilty conviction was established from evidence that was seized “without a warrant or other constitutional justification” (“The fourth amendment,” n.d., n.p.). The case was ultimately appealed and the defendant won the appeal because the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the guilty conviction, which led to the creation of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation is a constitutional legal code that protects the rights of a citizen that is ensured in the Bill of Rights. It has been used in numerous cases throughout time to remind everyone that every citizen’s rights are protected. Some cases include Town of Greece v. Galloway, McDonald v. Chicago, Benton v. Maryland, and Atkins v. Virginia. In these cases, multiple people were tried for what were misunderstood as wrongdoings. Selective Incorporation is used widely in the judicial branch by judges and the jury to determine a verdict.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mapp V. Ohio was about how a lady named, Dollree Mapp was convicted for having obscene materials after a admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She argued that it was constitutional and the first amendment gave her the right to possess that. Freedom of expression shouldn’t be have a price to pay. Mapp did win her case and with her case came the exclusionary…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grassley Cruz Legislation The Grassley Cruz Legislation is a bill that aims to achieve a variety of gun control issues in order to allow for greater safety from guns. The attempt to better gun safety is to first increase resources and tools for prosecuting criminals of these crimes. It is able to achieve this be criminalizing straw purchases of weapons along with adding additional penalties and qualifications for trafficking guns. The bill also aims to increase school safety.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gideon vs Wainwright is a landmark Supreme Court case that reinforces the Constitution as the Supreme law of the land, particularly in regard to the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments; insuring that a citizen has a proper and fair trial. This case signified the introduction of a new legal principle that today is still part of our society’s legal system. In 1961 Clarence Gideon was arrested after attempting to rob a pool hall in Panama City, Florida. During his trial, Gideon could not afford an attorney and he requested for the judge of the court to appoint an attorney for him. However, the judge refused to give Gideon an attorney, saying that under Florida law, the court would only be obligated to appoint an attorney to indigent defendants who…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The trial court, in this case the Superior Court, dismissed, or dropped, the charges against Mr. Greenwood stating that the warrantless searches of Mr. Greenwood's trash violated the protection from unreasonable search and seizure in the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. The government then appealed to the Court of Appeals and the California Supreme Court, both courts denied the government's claims and the case was finally appealed the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout all of American history, no other document has maintained an equally important and ever changing role in our government than the United States Constitution. The Constitution drew the plans for the creation the three branches of government and provided the structure on which the national government would grow. The most famous aspect of the Constitution is the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison as a response to the States’ demands that individual liberties be provided and protected, the Bill of Rights serves to establish the personal rights of every man in America. Among these rights are the right to counsel, which is preserved in the Sixth Amendment, and the right to not withstand or be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment,…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tinker Vs Moines

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In December of 1965, Mary Beth Tinker, her brother John Tinker, and their friend Christopher Eckhardt, students of Des Moines public schools, decided they were going to wear black armbands to school for a period of time in protest of the Vietnam war. The school board found out about the students’ plan to protest, and decided to put a ban on the wearing of black armbands on school property. If any student came to school wearing an armband, they would be suspended. The three students decided to come to school wearing the armbands, and they were suspended. The students decided to sue the school district, through their parents, and the case ended up going all the way to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    2 % Rule Case Study

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 2% rule states that your monthly rent should be approximately 2% of the pur- chase price. In other words, a $100,000 home should rent for $2,000 per month; a $50,000 home should rent for $1,000 per month. This is a very conservative esti- mate that is very simplistic but can help in deciding if a property warrants a deeper look. In most parts of the country, the 2% is very difficult to achieve, but the closer you can get to that, the better cash flow you'll receive. Real World Example: An average three bedroom home rents for $800 per month in your neighborhood.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This ruling prevents government officials from the continuance of unlawfully obtaining evidence and reinforces the Fourth Amendment. It took a liberal court to strike down what was bad law and apply the extension of the Fourth Amendment protection not to property, but to…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Discuss the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. Be sure to provide examples and explain your position on the exclusionary rule. Answer: The exclusionary rule is “A judicial rule that makes evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, state, or federal laws, or court rules inadmissible” (Gardner & Anderson, 2016, p. 214).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When reviewing a suspcionless search of both a person and electronic devices at a border, the Court should apply the de novo standard. The de novo standard should be applied because the Court is reviewing a question regarding the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Cotterman, 709 F.3d 952, 968 (9th Cir. 2013). Indeed, other courts considering this issue have applied the de novo standard. Id. Using this standard, this Court should give little or no deference to the lower court.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism and Gun Control Gun control in the United States has been a controversial topic for a number of years. The different ways in which one can interpret the constitution plays a big role in the controversy between whether certain gun control laws violate your civil liberties as citizens of the United States. There have been numerous court cases dealing with gun control, with some of the major including: District of Columbia Vs. Heller, McDonald Vs. Chicago, and Peruta Vs.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays