Georges Lemaynetre: Father Of The Big Bang Theory

Great Essays
Objective Description
In the year 2000, the American Museum of Natural History posted an essay as an online resource, Profile: Georges Lemaître, Father of the Big Bang. An excerpt from Cosmic Horizons: Astronomy at the Cutting Edge. It was edited by Steven Soter and Neil deGrasse Tyson.
The profile begins with a simple explanation of the expanding universe and how Georges Lemaître published his mathematical findings that today we know as the Big Bang theory.
Soter and deGrasse Tyson provide some of Lemaître’s life details. He was a Belgian cosmologist and a Catholic priest. He served in World War 1 as an artillery officer. They do not however provide any information about his family. This essay does not reveal what his parents did for living
…show more content…
Georges Lemaître was the father of the Big Bang theory. (Soter & deGrasse Tyson 2000).
4. “Lemaître’s religious interests remained as important to him as science throughout his life” (Soter & deGrasse Tyson 2000).
5. “Insisted that there was neither a connection nor a conflict between his religion and his science” (Soter & deGrasse Tyson 2000).
Cons Facts:
1. “This startling idea [the Big Bang theory] first appeared in scientific form in 1931, in a paper by Georges Lemaître […]” (Soter & deGrasse Tyson 2000).
2. “In 1927, Lemaître published in Belgium a virtually unnoticed paper that provided a compelling solution to the equations of General Relativity for the case of an expanding universe” (Soter & deGrasse Tyson 2000).
3. “[…] he served as an artillery officer [in World War I] and witnessed the first poison gas attack in history” (Soter & deGrasse Tyson 2000).
4. Soter and deGrasse Tyson failed to discuss that Hubble, quite often, mistakenly receives credit as “the Father of the Big Bang theory” (Wikipedia 2014).
5. Soter and deGrasse Tyson fail to provide sufficient personal information for Lemaître. It would have been more complete had they disclosed what his parents did for a living, if he had any siblings.
Subjective
…show more content…
I would have expected his name to be more prevalent and readily acknowledged during Big Bang discussions. “He was also the first to derive what is now known as Hubble’s law and made the first estimation of what is now called the Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble’ article” (Wikipedia 2014).
Perhaps this, on some level, is “Christian persecution.” The fact that Lemaître’s name is not naturally and obviously associated with Hubble’s law formula and constant is baffling. I am of the opinion it should read “Hubble/ Lemaître law.”
I find myself respecting this man. Lemaître must have fielded many questions about his faith and his work in science. It takes commitment to stand on both sides of what most see as opposing ideals. Yet, it appears, Lemaître did not waver from either position. He did not lose faith in God nor did he try to make God fit into a science mold. He successfully straddled both worlds for his entire life. The wisdom and discipline necessary for a life time of successful compartmentalization paints a picture of a strong

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    26-28 search.proquest.com.cyrano.ucmo.edu:2048/docview/275019126?pq-origsite=summon Accessed 21 Oct. 2016. This article provides insight on the operations launched against Japanese forces and the issued beliefs held by President Truman that he had saved a quarter-million Americans from being killed by dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This source will be utilized as a tool to portray the well-known facts that can be found in any reliable history text, but also bring contrast to why the government chose to annihilate the Japanese islands in 1945. Foertsch, Jacqueline. Reckoning Day : Race, Place, And The Atom Bomb In Postwar America, Vanderbilt University…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He once said “How Strange is the lot of us mortals! Each of us is here for a brief sojourn; for what purpose he know not, though he sometimes thinks he senses it (3).” One of his most known works is the General Theory of Relativity, which he completed in 1915. It accurately predicts Mercury’s orbit around the sun and filled many of the holes left in Isaac Newton’s theory (4). Another development Einstein was involved in was the Manhattan Project. Many people think that Einstein was the one who helped design the atomic bomb, when in reality, the only military tactical schemes he was involved in were very minimal.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, and in that, I rejoice.” However, I also think there is a need to evaluate carefully to MacCulloch’s history so that readers can discern the problems when they read this book. First, he claims that the Christian religion is a young religion compared to other religions “and the Christian faith is instability because it comes from the twofold ancestry.” Such claims without any grounded evidence of Scriptures are contradictory and have affected the trustworthiness of his article. Since he said the Christian religion is the all about the person Jesus Christ, he needs to know that this Jesus Christ is mentioned throughout Scripture. Christianity is God’s redemption of humanity and this redemptive plan of God has begun right after the fall of the first man ever – Adam. Therefore, it is not young as he thinks and compares to other religions.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science And Religion

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Therefore, religion and science can exist together without conflict if it serves the correct purpose. Explication The compatibility of religion and science has been an ongoing discourse for as long as methodologies of science has been introduced in human civilization, as discussed by David Hume in “Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion”. Hume explores whether existence of a divine being should be through rational experience or religious philosophy. He attempts to reconcile the conflict of scientific methodology to religious philosophy which is relevant to the coexistence of faith and science. He presents three characters to create a dialogue concerning natural religion.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science and religion have proven to work together for centuries now. Science refers to knowledge gathered through observations and experiments based on a series of hypotheses and theories. On the other hand, religion involves a belief in something based on absolute truths delivered as a gift from God. Additionally, religion provides us with faith and morals. Both science and religion are aimed at providing us with the truth, yet they just utilize different ways of thinking to go about it.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The supporter of Aristotelian conviction seems to be the dolt, getting got in his own contentions. Church response to the book was quick, and Galileo was summoned to Rome. The Inquisition procedures endured from September 1632 to July 1633. Amid the vast majority of this time, Galileo was approached with deference and never detained. Be that as it may, in a last endeavor to break him, Galileo was debilitated with torment, and he at long last conceded he had bolstered a Copernican hypothesis, yet secretly held that his announcements were right.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dobzhansky And Evolution

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Some forty years ago, there was a scientist credited with building the model of Neo-Darwinism, who was Theodosius Dobzhansky. Science lives through constant changes in secular theories and society about the beginning of the universe and of life on Earth, which give way to the idea of existentialism. Through some research, I found that he is best known for one his evolution paper, called Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution. Dobzhansky states in the article his three predictions that have been disproven in the following years after its publication. These guesses include that Darwin’s theory of the tree of life will be confirmed through genetics, that biological science discoveries would focus on evolution-based work…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grant was the most prominent spokesperson for this position because he defined what it meant to have no conflict between science and modern religion. He claimed “true religion has nothing to fear from a true science and true science has nothing to fear at the hands of a true religion”. In his work he uses the involvement of Christians within the scientific community including the accomplishments of people such as Charles Butler, Thomas Aquinas and Augustine, to give credit to his…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we all know, Benjamin Franklin was not only a founding father of the United States but also has been seen as a renaissance men with multiple talents such as being a scientist, inventor, and author. With his knowledge he expands his religious views over the years of American society in a different perspective. Franklin believed that religion was vital to sustaining a moral society with people being able to receive a motivation or incentive to live and towards the afterlife. However, despite the pros of religion towards the common people of America. Franklin strongly thought religion was worthless over time unless it promoted or distributed vitreous behavior upon the common people, but Franklin still thanked god for helping him achieve a good life with a…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I am a Christian and I believe that all life came to be through God. Science does make it more difficult to believe these days, because they try and explain all of the wonders of God by using science. For a lot of people this has a big impact on their faith and it might cause them to stop believing, but I feel that if your faith is strong enough you can overcome all of these things and still believe. I am also a person that enjoys science but I feel that science can only be used to explain thing up to a point. The things that are still a mystery to us today and that cannot be explained by science are the miracles of God and us as humans should not try and comprehend…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays