It certainly is reasonable to call the Shaper a sophist because the Shaper is less concerned of singing with the truth, and more concerned with pleasing his audience, even if he has to alter reality. Grendel seems to scorn sophism because he calls the Shaper’s words “ridiculous” and “infecting” yet ultimately powerful (Gardner 48, 49). Gardner seems to conclude through Grendel that sophist ideals can be effective, yet they are of course not always logical. Grendel is a character that believes only in logical things and Gardner uses him as a negative example. Through the fourth priest and Beowulf, Gardner shows that Grendel’s belief in logic and only logic is flawed. In this way, Gardner is playing with the idea of sophism as a legitimate method of
It certainly is reasonable to call the Shaper a sophist because the Shaper is less concerned of singing with the truth, and more concerned with pleasing his audience, even if he has to alter reality. Grendel seems to scorn sophism because he calls the Shaper’s words “ridiculous” and “infecting” yet ultimately powerful (Gardner 48, 49). Gardner seems to conclude through Grendel that sophist ideals can be effective, yet they are of course not always logical. Grendel is a character that believes only in logical things and Gardner uses him as a negative example. Through the fourth priest and Beowulf, Gardner shows that Grendel’s belief in logic and only logic is flawed. In this way, Gardner is playing with the idea of sophism as a legitimate method of