What Is Distributive Justice

Improved Essays
Social Justice
McKenna in his book, A Concise Guide to Catholic Social Teaching, stresses equal opportunities of all members of society in his description of social justice. He says that it is achieved “when people are giving opportunities to be active and productive participants in the life of society as part of their obligations, which is also the duty of the society to do so” (39). Chukwujekwu agrees with McKenna, but explains further that this aspect of justice deals more with “economic, racial and political relationships; nevertheless, he believes that it is not restricted to them. For him, it is that justice which “impels individuals and public officials to promote the common good and the common welfare taken distributively and collectively”
…show more content…
Hence, much of literature reviews are on distributive justice and its connection to other areas.

2.2 Theories and Principles of Distributive Justice The relationship that exists in the sharing of social benefits and burdens is said to be based on one theory or another in the course of a given period and circumstance. In particular, theories of distributive justice “seek to specify what is meant by a just distribution of goods among members of society” (Web 09/10/2016). Some authors and socio-political ideologists have sought to explain how a just society ought to be through different political ideologies such as capitalism, socialism, communism, welfarism and paternalism. Some scholars are reviewed based on these ideologies in relation to distributive justice.
…show more content…
Bruce scott in his article, “The Political Economy of Capitalism”, argues that capitalism is designed to promote the productive use of societal resources in order to meet consumer needs in the short run and to raise the standard of living through the time (Web 09/04/2017). Ha-Joon Chang in his book, Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism, believes that “the wage gaps between rich and poor countries exist not mainly because of differences in individual productivity but mainly because of immigration control, and that poor countries are poor not because of their poor people, many of whom can compete with their counterparts in rich countries, but because of their rich people” (Web 08/04/2017). He further asserts that what an “individual earns in rich and well organized countries is not fully and totally a reflection of their worth in terms of productivity and brilliance, but what the system has put in place for them” (Web

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Capitalism was the first system to ever benefit all levels of society when it first came around. So, what is wrong with capitalism? Why is capitalism so despicable? What is it about capitalism that induces such bitterness? The essay What is Wrong With Capitalism written by Thomas Storck effectively answers just that.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book The Divide by Matt Taibbi is an over look at the growing problem of inequality of the justice system. The book explains several examples of diversity in the justice in America. The diversity is between the wealthy and the not so wealthy. This book is a very good example of this course, because it is an over view of the different discussions throughout this courses.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consequently, the Marxist solution for distributive justice is the abolition of private property. Wei then analyzes the writing of Rawls and Nozick to show that their positions are actually similar. Nozick and Rawls both agree that private ownership is a natural result of the Marxist principle of “reward according to effort and ability.” The difference between Rawls and Nozick is that Rawls seeks to improve Marx principle of justice by having it operate through “justice as fairness.”…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What actions should we take to have a justice society? In distributive justice, there is a distributive of goods and services and in a good justice system we distribute those goods and services equally with everyone. It would take the form of a communist society.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rita Joe Injustice

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Justice in most societies is viewed to be a skewed concept and can be considered applicable to only some people. The poem Justice, by Rita Joe, speaks of injustice as a minority as she is of aboriginal descent. Injustice does not only exist in North America though, it is a situation that occurs across the globe, but it only applies to some and the others find a way to influence…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He then also discusses the three different ways in which humans are considered equal and these categories are equality before God, equality of opportunity, and equality of outcome. “Life is unfair” he said,…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Nozick Entitlement

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Robert Nozick’s “Entitlement Theory of Distributive Justice” can be expressed by three main golden rules such as “The Principle of Justice in Acquisition,” “The Principle of Justice in Transfer”,and 'The Principle of Justice in Rectification”. The Principle of Justice in Acquisition is a principle that believes you the person can designate to unowned belongings that you mash up with the labor you do, as long as you don't make the general public worse by doing so. The Principle of Justice in Transfer is an additional principle to Robert Nozick’s Entitlement Theory of Distributive Justice that places its confidence in a belief that allows people to transfer their entitlement to his or her property, or labor to a different person or parties…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Justice Definition

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My vision of a socially just society is possible with the support of two socialist paradigms, Social democracy and Marxism (Mullaly, 2007). Primarily, by the overlaps between them with respect to their views, beliefs, and fundamental values (Mullaly, 2007). My personal values of equality are supported by socialism in which equality does not mean treating everyone the same, but recognising that individual needs must be met in different ways. My socially just society is built on the foundation of increase in positive role of government intervention, as it can create the conditions of social equality vital for the attainment of freedom for all (Mullaly, 2007). Underpinning this role of the state is an emphasis on co-operation and a corresponding de-emphasis on competition (Mullaly, 2007).…

    • 1115 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the following essay I’ll be describing social stratification and distributive systems and how they compare to social and political stratification. “Social stratification means that’s inequality has been harden or institutionalized, and there is a system of social relationships that determines who gets what, and why” pg.10 (Kerbo, 2012). A system such as social stratification also means that rules have been established that shows why rewards or distributed and why they are distributed in a certain manner. Social stratification has been characterized by social class which groups individuals with those of similar income and political economic interest. The upper class make up the wealthy members of society and have the most political power.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Views on social justice are highly important in defining the roles of the state within society. The perspectives presented by John Rawls and Robert Nozick demonstrate two extremely different views of societal justice. Each of these philosophers give their own principles of justice, which are sets of rules society must follow in order to be just. In this paper, I will analyze the views of each of these thinkers. I will also argue that the Rawls’ principles of justice are preferable to Nozick’s due to Nozick’s lack of focus on societal inequalities.…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will be discussing the redistributive justice theories that are subscribed to deontological liberalism, so they do not presuppose any particular conception of the good (Sandel, 1998). This is particularly important since it is necessary to arrive to a solution where people are the ‘end goals’ and not simply ‘means’ to a certain other end. Firstly, I will be introducing two ideas, leaded by John Rawls and Robert Nozick, following with the demonstration of these approaches with the example of the coloured man. Also I will be bringing some strong critics that this two approaches have faced. The process of redistribution in distributive justice encompasses four main variables that need to be taken into account: the subjects (individuals or groups…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction John Rawls and Robert Nozick, two famous American philosophers standing at rival ends in the theory of distributive justice, have influenced the society not only in philosophy, but also covering economics, law, and public policy. To assess their success, this essay first examines Rawls’ Difference Principle and Nozick’s Entitlement Theory, then contrasts the two theories where issues arise. Lastly, it analyses the influence of both theories in society. The Theories of Distributive Justice Rawls’ Difference Principle – The Collectivist…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice is a term that people use to describe as an act or behavior that represents the good people present to others and themselves. It serves as a moral high ground that people strive to be, although sometimes these thoughts can be twisted into its opposite and cause pain, anger, and other negative emotions and acts arise within people. This pain erupts into what is known as injustice and is the epitome of what people should not strive for due it bringing so much negativity. It is a moral choice that no one what’s to make due to the label that it puts on them making them into monsters in the eyes of others due to what they believe could have been done. Although, in some cases, injustice is sometimes the best choice in the matter if one is…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is justice? The common good? Are they just words of idealistic thinking, or do they have a deeper meaning? The way of life is difficult and full of fright. One of the new ways to think of this problem is communitarianism.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Earth is currently facing detrimental environmental issues. These issues have been evident for decades; however, many people have continuously denied them to be problematic or even their existence entirely. While these critics have managed to get away with the rejection of these problems for many years, it is no longer deniable that the issue of environmental degradation is very real and in need of immediate action. Much of the population has come to understand this, and have executed a variety of modest attempts to increase environmental sustainability. However, these efforts have demonstrated to be of minimal effect in solving the large-scale issues directly causing the degradation.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays