Passive-Aggressive Personality
How do you know you are dealing with a passive-aggressive person? An ancient Chinese proverb describes passive-aggressive behavior as “a fist hiding behind a smile.” The NYU Medical Center defines a passive-aggressive individual as someone who, uncensored, "may appear to be sympathetic.” However, after considerable reflection, the realization finally arises that they are really doing more for themselves than anyone else. A passive-aggressive is a personality type, behavior, defense mechanism that allows people to turn aggression on and off like a light switch to fit the situation for their own personal gain. It’s a subheading of sociopathic behavior where there is no guilt or insight about the reality of feelings—just …show more content…
That’s not a surpise. Where would we be without it? However, as an adult, it is connected to social responsibility and family values.
The hot-wiring effects of creation in DNA are 80-20: 80% representing orgasm—ejaculation of semen by the male and involuntary vaginal contractions in the female; and 20% representing penal penetration into the vagina. Those males who have an inferiority complex about the size of their penis should only be concerned if they are impotent, suffer from premature ejaculation or have urinary or prostate issues. Once penetration has been achieved, it represents 20% of sexual intercourse. The orgasmic reward is 80%; thus the end justifies the means.
The 80-20 rule, known also as the Pareto principle, roughly states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. Economists devised this rule after it was observed by Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto that approximately 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population. He experimented with this rule in other areas, e.g., his garden. He observed that 20 % of the pea pods contained 80% of the peas. The original observation correlating population and wealth also proved out in a variety of other countries as …show more content…
Since humans are capable of independent actions, unrestrained free will can lead to stupidity, and they work best in the situations in which they evolved. They do not work well in the modern work place where chronic pent-up anger increases unhappiness and the chance of stroke or heart attack. On average, anger increases the unpleasantness of situations and solves nothing. Emotions can be evaluated as simple algorithms (finding the lowest common denominator when adding or subtracting fractions) because finding the first and simplest point of agreement increases changes of solving problems backed by conscious motivation.
The human brain evolved in stages: the more advanced, emotional primate brain was added on top of the mammalian brain, which was added on top of the reptilian brain, which was added onto the fish brain. Through repeated tinkering rather than by a single redesign and rebuild, this evolution instituted problems:
• The human brain’s series of computational modules or processors may have all of one’s best interests at heart, but the will of society conflicts with survival instincts;
• Programmed to survive, one accepts society’s ways to prosper, but their ways restrict one’s survival (sent to war ) or reproduce (celibacy,
How do you know you are dealing with a passive-aggressive person? An ancient Chinese proverb describes passive-aggressive behavior as “a fist hiding behind a smile.” The NYU Medical Center defines a passive-aggressive individual as someone who, uncensored, "may appear to be sympathetic.” However, after considerable reflection, the realization finally arises that they are really doing more for themselves than anyone else. A passive-aggressive is a personality type, behavior, defense mechanism that allows people to turn aggression on and off like a light switch to fit the situation for their own personal gain. It’s a subheading of sociopathic behavior where there is no guilt or insight about the reality of feelings—just …show more content…
That’s not a surpise. Where would we be without it? However, as an adult, it is connected to social responsibility and family values.
The hot-wiring effects of creation in DNA are 80-20: 80% representing orgasm—ejaculation of semen by the male and involuntary vaginal contractions in the female; and 20% representing penal penetration into the vagina. Those males who have an inferiority complex about the size of their penis should only be concerned if they are impotent, suffer from premature ejaculation or have urinary or prostate issues. Once penetration has been achieved, it represents 20% of sexual intercourse. The orgasmic reward is 80%; thus the end justifies the means.
The 80-20 rule, known also as the Pareto principle, roughly states that 80% of the effects come from 20% of the causes. Economists devised this rule after it was observed by Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto that approximately 80% of the land in Italy was owned by 20% of the population. He experimented with this rule in other areas, e.g., his garden. He observed that 20 % of the pea pods contained 80% of the peas. The original observation correlating population and wealth also proved out in a variety of other countries as …show more content…
Since humans are capable of independent actions, unrestrained free will can lead to stupidity, and they work best in the situations in which they evolved. They do not work well in the modern work place where chronic pent-up anger increases unhappiness and the chance of stroke or heart attack. On average, anger increases the unpleasantness of situations and solves nothing. Emotions can be evaluated as simple algorithms (finding the lowest common denominator when adding or subtracting fractions) because finding the first and simplest point of agreement increases changes of solving problems backed by conscious motivation.
The human brain evolved in stages: the more advanced, emotional primate brain was added on top of the mammalian brain, which was added on top of the reptilian brain, which was added onto the fish brain. Through repeated tinkering rather than by a single redesign and rebuild, this evolution instituted problems:
• The human brain’s series of computational modules or processors may have all of one’s best interests at heart, but the will of society conflicts with survival instincts;
• Programmed to survive, one accepts society’s ways to prosper, but their ways restrict one’s survival (sent to war ) or reproduce (celibacy,