Essay On Non Human Animal Rights

Great Essays
There is lot of controversy surrounding the non-human or animal rights. There is much less disagreement on the consequences of accepting that animals have rights. Animal rights do not allow some things to be done on the animals. The ethics surrounding this teach us that certain things are wrong if done to the animals. It is important to avoid doing some things to animals. Animals are a major part of the environment. To protect the rights of animals is must to every human in the environment. Animal rightts are also known as "Animal Liberation", meaning that the most basic interests of non-human animals should be treated the same way as the similar interests of human beings. Animal law is taught in 119 out of 180 law schools in the United States, …show more content…
It is argued that the non-human animals have rights and that there is no morally relevant difference between the adult mammals and the non-human animals and hence adult mammals must have rights too. The main reason behind the argument is that the animals have same rights and deserve them as the other human being is that they have similar levels of the biological complexity; like human beings, animals are also aware and conscious that they exist which a lot of people tend to forget. The non-human animals also know what is happening to them; they also dislike and like some things like the human beings as well as making conscious choices. These are some issues that are behind fighting for the animal rights. The non-human animals also live in such a way that they give themselves best quality of life as human beings do. There are still some issues like animals planning their life by the animals as well as minding about their length and quality of their life. it is even more demanding for the animals to be given the rightss they deserve by not being exploited. Animals therefore have inherent values like the human beings and thus they are entitled to same rights to human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although humans have evolved to the point where we can devote some attention to honoring the animals that help us build our society, we should not degenerate our society to account for their feelings. One such story of degeneration is of Kevin Martin, a man whose research of AIDS medication was halted by the Swiss Health Department on account of an ethic review that had already been approved by other organizations.(Yong 39) Another example are animals farmed for meat consumption. Although ultimately, they are born just to die, they aren't killed for the sake of killing; They are killed to aid human society. As callous as it sounds, animals having more rights would work to stagnate human progress due to extra regulations both legally and…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe granting animals equal rights would be disastrous to the environment, and negate the greatest good for all. Humans have a responsibility to our environment from both a responsibility to all things that live in it, as well as from a self-preservation standpoint. Decisions regarding moral responsibility reign beyond the rights of each individual unit in the ecosystem, with consideration to the greatest good for all. However, totally acknowledgement of Calicott’s premise is difficult as a unit within the ecosystem.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer in the article “All Animals are Equal,” defends the opinion that non-human animals must be respected as the lives of humans. He argues that all animals are equals. Singer claims equality is the base on same consideration, is a moral idea, and the capacity to suffer is a prerequisite for rights. To demonstrate that equality is based on equal consideration, Peter argues ideas to not extend the rights to non humans are inconsistent.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many thought that the idea of natural rights might be expanded to include the right of nature. There has been moments that has begun to ask whether being other than human might have civil rights. There has been environmentalists and animals right activists have operated on the different ethical perspectives, and what caused flicts between them. There is many horror that is felt when abuse of such animals on farms or in laboratories draw on the emotive bonding to the pet. Interrelationship to pets should not be just given to the animals that live with a person, they should be given to all animals.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As you think of the answers to these questions, studies have proven that our fellow creatures are more like us than we imagine. They feel pain, suffer, affection, excitement and love; therefore, they deserve humane rights. The idea that animals have rights may sound odd to others because we do not compare the worth of their life to the worth of ours. Animals surely deserve to live their lives free from suffering and exploitation.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal rights is a topic that has been all over the news lately and has raised many questions which makes it a controversial topic. Many argue that animals should not obtain rights as humans. However, animals must acquire a Bill of Rights since they are treated inhumanly and have similar traits as humans. Accordingly, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) claims that animals have the right to earn rights just like any other living creature.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It states that animals should be free of cruelty, free from unusual experiments, a healthy diet, a shelter, and medical care. It also states that animals shall stay in their natural habitat to keep their population, that farm animals to have an environment that sustains their needs, and lastly, it states that animals can be represented in courts. These rights are made to represent all animals, however, that is not necessary. Animals are very similar to humans and are capable of many emotion and being intelligent. Animal right to this extent should be applied to every animal.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal rights activists have gained considerable attention in the past few decades through education of the public. The exposure of animal cruelty has led more people to support the need for animal rights. The question now is not whether or not animals deserve rights. Instead, the question is what should those rights be and how far should they extend. A key factor that determines what rights an individual deserves is dignity.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals must be granted a bill of rights because they possess humanlike intellectual skills and feelings. In the Los Angeles Times article “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Jeremy…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Animal rights is the idea in which all animals have the right to their life and their most basic interest, like avoiding pain and suffering. Animal rights movements started in the west, the first public victory for animal rights activist was the Britain's Treatment of Cattle Act or The Martin’s Act, which prevents improper treatment towards…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Evans 21). A great defense for animal rights is philosophy, philosophical discussions use ideas and theories about questions morality. In this case philosophy is animal rights’ best supporter. The touchy subject that is animal rights can be difficult to conclude and apply to real-life situations, but philosophy is important because it explains people 's motivations and why people feel the way they do about an issue like animal cruelty and meat consumption. Philosophical arguments are typically used to either justify certain actions directed to animals today.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights Should animals have rights? If so, should these rights be comparable to those given to humans? Animal Rights are rights believed to be owed to animals in order for them to live full lives, free from suffering. Animals are currently being used, and in some cases abused, in medical research, clothing industries, hunting for sport, food, and population control, and countless other services to humans. As is the case with all ethical issues, there are two defined perspectives and supporters of the current and future treatment given and due to animals.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays