Moral Relativism In Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go

Superior Essays
Ishiguro shows the manipulation of human form and social ideologies through his formation of progressive capitalist society in Never Let Me Go. To show this truth, Ishiguro touches on many aspects of the society through his way of writing, first of all, he shows the way the capital society is able to exploit people and make them happy with the control it holds on them. Secondly he shows how people who hold control over other, and can convince them that any other different group of people is less of a human. After, Ishiguro touches on the idea of moral relativism and how in this progressive society misused it to show cloning as something totally fine and acceptable, which makes the vast majority, agree on it. Then he shows how group …show more content…
This show how morality varies depends on the society, and on the culture. However, Ishiguro show the possible bad use of this concept, and how the morality of people can be manipulated in a bad way under this concept. In Never Let Me Go Ishiguro shows in the very last sections how people consider cloning as something moral and they do not want to do anything about it. This idea reflect how morality is relative depends on the society. However, in the book Ishiguro shows how controllers with bad intentions are able manipulate this idea to serve their desires. This makes people consider immoral actions on all of the standards as moral actions, by creating new standards that contradict with humanity where absolute morality kicks in. Also this manipulation of the values of humanity shows unbalance between the superego and the Id according to the psychoanalytic theory. The Id of these people is absolutely taking over and makes them reach this extent of moral relativism. The idea or moral relativism is definitely present in our world. As stated in the encyclopedia of philosophy “Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others” (www.iep.utm.edu ) This quote shows morality is something changeable and depends only on certain point of view. Moreover, this quote state that all moral value undergo the same way of judging. Except for the humanity values that should not be changeable. Because all societies and cultures share that it was build, formed and contains humans, and what all humans share is humanity. In conclusion, Ishiguro shows how certain society are willing to cross this limits, to achieve their desires, even if it was by manipulating the values of humanity within these

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Ubuntu Ethics The world we live in is a complex equilibrium between good and evil where we are constantly faced with moral dilemmas. Although many different schools of thought have attempted to define the most appropriate code of ethics for humans I chose to focus on the Kantian and Ubuntu moral theories. The basis of Kantian morality is that there are clear and simple moral truths that dictate our actions, while Nussbaum (2003) states that Ubuntu morality focuses on a person’s existence within a community as a basis for moral decisions (Kant & Gregor, 1998). By using the “Nazi at the door” dilemma as a foil between the two theories, I showed how both theories equally fail to define the appropriate code of moral conduct for humanity.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals often face many decisions in life where they must decide what they believe as right and wrong and what society regards as right and wrong. In the 19th-century novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain depicts the development of a moral code and presents the guilty conscience as a flaw in individuals, therefore…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrifice In Aztec Culture

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are countless cultures exist in the world, we were all raised to believe in different things and taught with different perspectives, even things that sometimes other cultures do not consider or even know that existed. Therefore, how can we judge someone’s characteristics sorely based on his actions? There are different moral codes in different cultures, even different traditions and different Gods. Cultural relativism lengthens this idea by presuming that whether a moral action is accepted differ from society to society, and different society follow different rules, thus all cultures are treated equally. One can argue that human sacrifice in Aztec civilization was accepted by within own society, just as we have turkeys for Thanksgiving…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If individuals had no moral values, everyone would be running around without a care in the world and solely worried about themselves. There would be no awareness for anybody or anything so we would turn into selfish human beings. Ethical relativism is “the doctrine that the moral rightness and wrongness of actions vary from society to society and that there are no absolute universal moral standards binding on all men at all times” (Pojman, 14). There are some moral values worldwide that are just adopted overtime and for that I will support Louis Pojman and what he states about ethical relativism being an incoherent theory, how it is much bigger than just individuals or even societies. I strive to hit on conventionalism and subjectivism, which have their up sides but ultimately diminish Pojman’s argument on ethical relativism.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In these next few paragraphs, I will expose the problems with cultural relativism; namely, through the use of the law of non-contradiction. Cultural relativism is an ethical theory that states “correct moral standards are relative to cultures or societies …” (Shafer-Landau 293). For example, the Inuit people believed that infanticide was morally acceptable. In contrast, most of the world believes that infanticide is highly immoral and never acceptable.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural Relativism Cultural Relativism is a prevalent theory that is used to explain the variety of differences within cultures and their morals. In this paper I will address the claims of James Rachels and Ruth Benedict, and their opposing views on cultural relativism. The authors have their own theories, against and for cultural relativism. Benedict illustrates that diversity is apparent even on the topics of morality where we would expect to agree.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Hands Off Clitoridectomy” by Yael Tamir, discusses the controversial topic of clitoridectomy, and all the arguments within the subject while opening up a new way of perceiving it by comparing it to our own society and practices. She suggest that indeed the practice of clioridectomy is a gruesome and gutwrenching, but there is more to the subject than just the moral issues of it. She address the political and social aspects of performing and living with the procedure and addresses them with passive but firm arguments. Her main point of the article is that our society needs to stop judging and creating prejudices aimed at other cultures or societies when in fact we could be bettering our own society rather than critiquing others.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How should we think about ethics? In order to answer this ultimate question, we must first understand the crucial concepts of ethics, but before we look into the concepts, it is essential to state the basic definition of ethic because the word “ethics” is the basis of the question. In our society, ethics is commonly defined as the study of morals, which are the standards of right and wrong that show humans what to do. Knowing this, we can continue with the concepts of ethics. First of all, we have to understand how knowledge about ethics is gained.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, philosopher Immanuel Kant discussed this question by explaining the aspects that contributes to a morally right action. Based on the implications of what contributes to a moral action through the movie and Kant’s…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy paper on relativism and weather I agree or disagree In the following paper I will be discussing relativism, more specifically cultural and ethical relativism and weather I agree or disagree with that philosophy. Cultural revisits state that “no particular moral or ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong.” Ethical relativism states that …”whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced”. I agree with ethical and cultural relativism because there is no right or wrong moral code because people and societies have different beliefs.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Folkways, William Graham Sumner claimed that morality is actually just a reflection of the mores. He further argued that since morality came from the typical culture groups, it should be only bounded within the group but not universally. The thesis Sumner raised in his argument, aka, ethical relativism, had been challenged by many objections. In this essay, I will provide one objection of ethical relativism and argue that even Sumner attempted to address the objection; his thesis is still fallacious due to begging the question. One critical objection to ethical relativism is the absurd objection.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moral relativists such as David Wong and Gilbert Harman have provided a more sophisticated version of moral relativism which mitigated some flaws of the inaugural and naïve form which Rachel argued against. Cultural relativism is also a relevant theory to explain the extreme cases of disagreements in our world. However, there is still invalidity and shortcomings of the cultural relativism argument that hinders moral progress, or deteriorate the view about morality into nihilistic grounds. Hence it is still essential to maintain some moral truths as objective instead of accepting the theory in…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics