Examples Of Moral Luck

Great Essays
Moral luck occurs whenever luck makes a moral difference in two or more cases. The problem of moral luck arises from a conflict between the widely held intuition that moral luck should not occur in moral judgment with the fact that it is arguably impossible to prevent it from happening.
Before getting into the problem which luck occurs and makes a moral difference, let’s look at a case to test an intuition. Suppose, there is a person A behind me who is tripped by the uneven floor, and the person pushed me without any harmful intention. I failed onto the ground and accidentally triggered the switch of the sluice to let all the water to flood down, causing death of some people and millions of government fund. Will I be held morally responsible?
…show more content…
However, does this mean that human agency has absolutely no control over his or her decisions? I believe that it is true that we can act freely or exercise free will even if the circumstances are already laid in front of us. We, moral agents, can have control over certain actions by adopting freedom and responsibility even if we do not control the causal factors. In the initial example: there are two over speed drivers, one is held responsible for killing a pedestrian who suddenly popped up and the other one is not held responsible for anything. The conflict is that they are acting the same except there is a pedestrian in the “unlucky” case, therefore the “unlucky” one is blamed much worse than the “lucky” one. However, is it true that the so-called “unlucky” over speed driver has absolutely no control? The over speed driver could certainly choose not to drive his or her car over the speed limit. Therefore even the pedestrian suddenly appears, it would give the driver enough time to stop the car, and the pedestrian would not die. In the over speed driver case, it is true that the appearance of the pedestrian is not under the control of the driver, but it is also true that choosing to go over speed or not is under the driver’s control. What I am trying to say here is that there are many factors contribute a certain event or situation. Just because one of those factors is out of the person’s control does not prove that the outcome of the event is due to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The same can be said for humans. Humans control their own destiny, but there is only so much they can do to keep outside factors from making an…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ”(Nelkin). Moral luck in simpler terms is the luck that many people have when surviving life threatening situations. The luck that many had on 9/11 included those people that had gotten help from those altruistic people. With selfless acts being luck of the…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is a worldview? 1. A worldview is the social system from which we discover reality in order to grasp its significance. This includes any religious opinions, principles, values, or philosophical system which provides a methodology to understanding the world and human beings.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Case Against Free Will” - Protocol Paper 4 RECALL: In “The Case against Free Will” by Rachels question; 1) Are we really responsible for what we do. ; 2) Does “Free Will or Free Choice,” effect our behavior. Rachels claim “Since we are a part of nature, whatever happens inside us follows the laws of nature.” ; 3) The case of Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb, who murdered a boy named Bobby Franks, is used as an example to support their claim; 4) Clarence Darrow, the defense lawyer for Leopold and Loeb, claimed “human character is shaped by an individual’s genes and environment.”…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Regarding circumstantial luck, even if we weigh what someone would have done in our moral assessments, we still must account for the actual circumstance. Context is required to form moral judgments; otherwise they are only…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans decisions are in the hands of each own. Their opportunity to make use of each decision expresses our free will. In life, humans determine whether their freedom of making their decision is too extreme, and if they should make that decision or not. Sometimes that pushes us to our limit and forces us to do things we are not usually accustomed to doing. While we express the opportunity to showcase free will, there are limits that can stop the idea of it, for example laws.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nagel develops the idea of moral luck to challenge and perhaps replace what he terms the condition of control, which is the idea that people cannot be morally evaluated, and thus held morally responsible, if they did not have control over the event (Nagel, 723-724). We often evoke this notion in situations where someone commits a terrible act, but there was some aspect of the world they could not control that led to the situation. For example, if a person is driving down the road safely, following all laws, and a child jumps in front of her and dies from the accident, the driver would not be morally judged for this action, as she could not have prevented it. However, Nagel suggests there are indeed times when morally evaluate people who do not control a significant aspect of what they do or have done.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, blaming one specific person does not resolve the…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As autonomous humans we generally think we are morally responsible for all the things we have done. That being said, it is only natural to believe that for a person who is morally responsible for what he/she has done than they could have done otherwise. Meaning they could have do the exact opposite of what they did. This alludes to the question that many philosophers have struggled with, this being, what does it mean when someone says that an individual who acted in a particular way “could have done otherwise?.” R. Chrisholm takes this concept as the fundamental question in our metaphysics of action and has formulated many explanations for the so called “free-will problem.”…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical ideologies are inherent and play a vital role in our decision to make moral decisions and whether or not those decisions are right or wrong. Two major philosophers that proposed two theories of ethics that gave an understand of what is right or wrong are Kant and Nagel. Kant theorized that the rightness or wrongness of actions doesn’t depend on our consequences but on whether we fulfill our duty. Nagel proposed the idea of Moral Luck and said that Moral Luck occurs when we judge an agent or assign moral blame or praise for an action or it’s consequences even if it is clear that an agent had no control in the situation.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concept of fate, the idea that there is a higher power that controls every aspect of one’s life, has plagued mankind since the dawn of philosophy. According to an article called “When it comes to fate, even non-believers believe”, "Among God-believers, 84.8 percent reported some degree of belief in fate, 13.0 percent reported they were neutral and 2.2 percent denied belief in fate. " Almost everyone believes in fate at some point in their life; although, the event in their life where fate affected them and made them deduce that fate is real can derive from either bad or good luck. If something random happens to someone and it favours them, like winning the lottery, then that is good luck for that person; likewise, if something random happens…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Nagel is a New York University professor and has written many things regarding the mind and moral theory. In moral luck Nagel thinks through the whole Kantian view of morality which shows that everyone is equal participants in the moral enterprise. Nagel argues that the Kantian view is too simple and doesn’t take into account the way external factors impinge upon us. Nagel brings up four different types of moral luck: constitutional luck, circumstantial luck, consequential luck which means consequences retrospectively justifies an otherwise immoral act (or fail to justify an otherwise more act), and consequential luck which the consequences affect the type or quality of blame or remorse (or moral praise). Having luck, whether it be good or bad, should impact how a person should act towards things.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This philosophical question is still not unsolved, but in this essay I will argue that a freedom of choice cannot be had by an agent in a deterministic world. Determinism thesis states that all events in the universe are determined by previous events. In determinism, every even is determined to happen by the laws of the the system.it is assumed that once the laws are set and the systems are decided, everyone following the event in the system is also decided. This assumption proves that humans are not free to chose how they act, but are determined by prior events over which they have no control over. The freedom that is precluded by determinism is the freedom to act without recourse to prior events, which means not having a choice determined and is able to act many different ways in any situation regardless of the cause.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays