In this article state both side of the argument of the Arthur authenticity. In one half it talks about Arthur being a real historical figure in which he was a great hero instead of a king. The other half talk about him just being a literary figure and nothing else, it goes on in to saying that it lack any evidence of record and saying if he was a great hero and king he would have been in record and it wouldn’t been lost in history. The articles claims that in order for the story to survive it would had to survive the withdrawal of rome from britain were britain were left defenseless.
