Justify Animal Testing

Improved Essays
4.2 Justification for animal tests

When required to make proper provision to ensure human safety, animal testing to enable the proper biological characterization of materials used in medical devices is acceptable.

For the purposes of the ISO 10993 series, animal tests shall only be deemed to be justified when:

the resulting data are not otherwise available, but are essential to properly characterize the test material in the context in which it is to be used;

when no suitable scientifically validated test method not involving the use of living animals is reasonably and practically available;

when relevant reduction and refinement strategies have been identified and implemented including, if appropriate, obtaining test data from manufacturers
…show more content…
As stated in 4.2, animal testing shall only be undertaken when the information required is essential to characterize the test material, is not otherwise available and when no suitable scientifically validated test method not involving the use of living animals is reasonably and practically available.

Following consideration of relevant and reasonably available potential replacement, reduction and refinement strategies, and before animal tests are undertaken, principal investigators and/or sponsors shall attest and document that no other replacement, reduction, or refinement strategies are required to minimize the animal welfare costs of the studies.
Where the provisions of the ISO 10993 series of International Standards require or permit that an informed choice be made from a range of species, stages of development or animal numbers for an animal test, the decisions taken shall both safeguard the scientific validity of the test and minimize any pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm to the animals used. The rationale for the decisions taken shall be
…show more content…
When purpose-bred animals are not used, the justification and details of the provenance of the animals that are used shall be documented.

High standards of care and accommodation enhance the welfare of the animals used and promote the scientific validity of animal testing. Animal care and accommodation shall demonstrably, as a minimum, conform to relevant, published national or international animal care, accommodation and husbandry guidelines.

The relevant guidelines or requirements shall be referenced, and evidence of compliance (or details of non-compliance accompanied by an assessment of its likely impact on the welfare of the animals used and the validity of the data obtained) shall be explained, justified, and documented.

Any component of the husbandry system that does not make best provision for the welfare of the test animals, might compromise the scientific validity of the test, or inappropriately influence the nature or interpretation of the test result, shall be documented.

Social species shall be housed as stable, compatible pairs or groups unless single-housing is required for veterinary, husbandry, animal welfare, or scientific

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Roughly twenty-six million animals are used for different types of testing in the United States every year (Animal Testing - Procon.org). These tests range from developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of medications, checking the safety of products that will be used by humans, to healthcare and commercial uses (Animal Testing - Procon.org). Proponents to animal research and testing back their views up with the fact that there are laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, such as the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) (Animal Testing - Procon.org). The Animal Welfare Act defines an animal as, “any live or dead dog, cat, monkey, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or such other warm blooded animal.” (Animal Testing - Procon.org).…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Should significant resources be expended in order to phase out the use of animals in preclinical testing? Topic Preclinical animal testing is an outdated research method which is inaccurate, unethical, and extremely costly; sponsor companies should expend the necessary resources to begin adopting non-animal testing models as they become available in order to progressively reduce, and ultimately discontinue their use of animals. The contents of this paper will discuss supporting ethical, scientific, and economic evidence, in addition to evaluating possible opposing arguments, and proposing a relevant plan of action. Background Preclinical animal testing has been a boiler plate topic for nearly a century.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With the advent of technology and biological testing of animals which is mistreatment speciesism had reached a different level in the 60s and the 70s. The conditions given to these animals were based on the cost and the conduct efficiencies for than those traditional methods that had been developed in earlier times. Ryder clear…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits that more than half of their experiments involving animals result in the trash because the difficulty of handling with animals are producing false information. Animal testing is unpredictable because the condition of each individual animal and species will vary. Clearly, experimenting with animals is unreasonable, dangerous, and…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Testing on animals is an ongoing debate among people due to the reasoning, pros and cons, and the alternative choices available. There are many reasons that people test on animals. “Animal experimentation became the primary method of learning about anatomy, physiology, and disease processes.” (13). Using animals for…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reprieve Animal Testing

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Oliveira 1 Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, alternate testing methods are available, and because humans and animals are every different from each other making animals very poor test subjects. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC (Animal Testing Pro & Con). Scientist use animals for many different purposes. Animals are used to test the effectiveness and safety of new drugs before those drugs are given to people to treat illness and disease. Animals can also be used as test subjects for products like lipstick, eyeshadow, contact lens solution, and shampoo (Hayhurst, 26).…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While scientists often argue that animal testing is necessary for medical advancement, it can be considered inhumane and is not always necessary. Animals are used in research to determine the safety of products, advance in science, study disease, and develop forms of treatment. While there are alternatives for…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, it is necessary to take into account that animal testing sometimes can be necessary over the course of months and even years, and it require additional…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fewer animals are used in research than as food for humans Compared to the amount of chicken, cattle, sheep and pigs that humans eat, relatively few of them are used in experimentation. With consideration to the medical progress and advancement such tests provided, it is a small…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing History

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals are used in many aspects of our society today. From food products to search and rescue, the creatures we live with have been integrated into our lives. However, the respect and courtesy to animals (and the help they give) is sometimes quite miniscule, especially with animal testing, where they are subjected to diseases, malnutrition, and separation from their natural groups. Medical procedures have advanced incredibly in the last few decades thanks to animal testing. However, the procedures used to obtain these advances have been both inhuman and painful to the animals used as test subjects, from being exposed to deadly diseases , or getting deprived of food and water, to getting torn away from family members.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine your family pet being enclosed in a small, cold, and dirty cage for days, weeks, or even months on end, only being taken out to be subjected to painful experiments without any anesthetic, as well as the possibility of developing life threatening diseases and injuries. Too many animals experience this on a regular basis around the globe - in fact, nearly 25 million animals will be used as test subjects annually. Animal testing is a horrible occurrence, one that brings suffering to even the smallest of creatures. Many people do not know the extremes of the effects of this practice, which are unnecessarily painful to animals, or that alternatives do exist, and that the results are not always accurate and time/cost effective. Experiments…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cody Hayes-Tyler Professor Hinchen English 1302 6/27/17 Animal Experimentation: An Annotated Bibliography Day, Nancy. Animal Experimentation: Cruelty or Science? Hillside, N.J., U.S.A.: Enslow, 1994. Print. Nancy Day discusses the two different viewpoints of the widely debated topic of animal testing and thoroughly talks about the consequences of animal testing and experimentation and also the benefits we gain and build upon.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Value Of Animal Testing

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “This is irregular either one is allowed rights by being admired by and adult human and thus entirely valued by an adult human has rights or there must be different criteria for granting rights” (Ball and Norris 37). Humans have privileges because they belong to the species Homo sapiens. Today other animals are still not considered adequately like us for the bulk of people to handle these animals as our acquaintances under the Golden Rule. Those who assert that only humans have souls are confronted with a theological dilemma: it would call for a cruel God to create beings with the ability to feel pain and the desire to live, if these animals intention was to endure at the hands of humans. While it is true that some animals kill other animals…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Viewpoints

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As a whole, this concept is a reliable way to make sure animals are treated fairly in their respective research…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? Introduction: An estimated twenty six million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals make poor test subjects, and animals’ rights are violated. I. Animals should be used for scientific or commercial testing.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays